{"title":"Efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in Combating the Deleterious Effect of Electromagnetic Fields and Geopathic Stress on Sleep","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/bscr.02.03.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The aim of this research is to determine the efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in enhancing sleep and other related parameters of a person sleeping in an environment surrounded with natural and manmade sources of EMF. Materials and Methods Sixty-six healthy subjects (44 subjects for Enviroglobe and 22 subjects for Geomat), between 18-60 years were enrolled for this interventional study. The study was conducted at the Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India. Result The comparison of sleep data with and without Enviroglobe in terms of Deep Sleep (78.8 ±53.9) vs (85.3 ±30.5), (p<0.030) was found to be statistically significant. There was a trend towards significance in sleep efficiency score and REM sleep as well. We did not find any statistically significant difference between light sleep and awake time. There was a statistically significant difference between the sleep data with Geomat in terms of Sleep efficiency score (67.4 ±9.7) vs (73.8 ±7.6), p< 0.028 and awake time (61.3 ±15.4) vs (51.0 ±11.5), p<0.021. We did not find any statistically significant difference between REM, deep sleep, and light sleep. Discussion The World Health Organization (WHO) / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.","PeriodicalId":72393,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical science and clinical research","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical science and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/bscr.02.03.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this research is to determine the efficacy of Enviroglobe and Geomat in enhancing sleep and other related parameters of a person sleeping in an environment surrounded with natural and manmade sources of EMF. Materials and Methods Sixty-six healthy subjects (44 subjects for Enviroglobe and 22 subjects for Geomat), between 18-60 years were enrolled for this interventional study. The study was conducted at the Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India. Result The comparison of sleep data with and without Enviroglobe in terms of Deep Sleep (78.8 ±53.9) vs (85.3 ±30.5), (p<0.030) was found to be statistically significant. There was a trend towards significance in sleep efficiency score and REM sleep as well. We did not find any statistically significant difference between light sleep and awake time. There was a statistically significant difference between the sleep data with Geomat in terms of Sleep efficiency score (67.4 ±9.7) vs (73.8 ±7.6), p< 0.028 and awake time (61.3 ±15.4) vs (51.0 ±11.5), p<0.021. We did not find any statistically significant difference between REM, deep sleep, and light sleep. Discussion The World Health Organization (WHO) / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.