Cyborg farmers: Embodied understandings of precision agriculture

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Sociologia Ruralis Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1111/soru.12456
Daniel van der Velden, Laurens Klerkx, Joost Dessein, Lies Debruyne
{"title":"Cyborg farmers: Embodied understandings of precision agriculture","authors":"Daniel van der Velden, Laurens Klerkx, Joost Dessein, Lies Debruyne","doi":"10.1111/soru.12456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Precision agriculture is often seen as disembodied and placeless, promised to either bring about a fourth agricultural revolution or as the start of dystopian rural futures, where farmers and their knowledge will be replaced by machines. A growing body of literature shows more nuanced ways of working with precision agriculture. This illustrates the need to investigate how, and under which conditions, precision agriculture is integrated and internalised by farmers. Based on 25 in‐depth interviews with male Dutch crop farmers, contractors, researchers, and ag‐tech developers, we develop the concept of the cyborg farmer, who embodies the use of precision technology while maintaining an intimate relationship with agro‐ecological context. This approach challenges the mind–body dichotomy in that the cognitive is not understood as primary, as emotions and the materiality of the body are taken seriously. This perspective emphasises the importance of embodied knowledge in how farmers interpret precision agriculture data. Our findings highlight the productive tension between data‐driven elements of precision agriculture and the embodied and intuitive understanding of agro‐ecological context. This productive tension consists of the successful integration of different forms of knowledge by the cyborg farmer, where embodied sense‐making and precision agriculture data are integrated into the formation of useable knowledge. The cyborg farmer maintains farmer agency and resists the dominance of algorithmic rationality over other forms of knowledge .","PeriodicalId":47985,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia Ruralis","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia Ruralis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Precision agriculture is often seen as disembodied and placeless, promised to either bring about a fourth agricultural revolution or as the start of dystopian rural futures, where farmers and their knowledge will be replaced by machines. A growing body of literature shows more nuanced ways of working with precision agriculture. This illustrates the need to investigate how, and under which conditions, precision agriculture is integrated and internalised by farmers. Based on 25 in‐depth interviews with male Dutch crop farmers, contractors, researchers, and ag‐tech developers, we develop the concept of the cyborg farmer, who embodies the use of precision technology while maintaining an intimate relationship with agro‐ecological context. This approach challenges the mind–body dichotomy in that the cognitive is not understood as primary, as emotions and the materiality of the body are taken seriously. This perspective emphasises the importance of embodied knowledge in how farmers interpret precision agriculture data. Our findings highlight the productive tension between data‐driven elements of precision agriculture and the embodied and intuitive understanding of agro‐ecological context. This productive tension consists of the successful integration of different forms of knowledge by the cyborg farmer, where embodied sense‐making and precision agriculture data are integrated into the formation of useable knowledge. The cyborg farmer maintains farmer agency and resists the dominance of algorithmic rationality over other forms of knowledge .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人农民:对精准农业的具体理解
精准农业通常被认为是无实体的、无地点的,要么被认为会带来第四次农业革命,要么被认为是反乌托邦式农村未来的开始,届时农民和他们的知识将被机器取代。越来越多的文献展示了更细致入微的精准农业方法。这说明需要调查精准农业如何以及在何种条件下被农民整合和内部化。基于对荷兰男性作物农民、承包商、研究人员和农业技术开发人员的25次深入访谈,我们提出了电子农民的概念,他们体现了精密技术的使用,同时保持了与农业生态环境的亲密关系。这种方法挑战了身心二分法,因为认知不被理解为主要,因为情感和身体的物质性被认真对待。这种观点强调了具体知识在农民如何解释精准农业数据中的重要性。我们的研究结果强调了精准农业的数据驱动元素与对农业生态环境的具体和直观理解之间的生产张力。这种生产张力由机器人农民成功整合不同形式的知识组成,其中具体化的意义制造和精确农业数据被整合到可用知识的形成中。半机械人农民保持农民的能动性,抵制算法理性对其他知识形式的支配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia Ruralis
Sociologia Ruralis Multiple-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Sociologia Ruralis reflects the diversity of European social-science research on rural areas and related issues. The complexity and diversity of rural problems require multi and interdisciplinary approaches. Over the past 40 years Sociologia Ruralis has been an international forum for social scientists engaged in a wide variety of disciplines focusing on social, political and cultural aspects of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis covers a wide range of subjects, ranging from farming, natural resources and food systems to rural communities, rural identities and the restructuring of rurality.
期刊最新文献
New immigration destinations in Sweden: Migrant residential trajectories intersecting rural areas Sacred serpents and the discourse on conservation: Interrogating interspecies dynamics in rural Bardhaman Stewardship and everyday governance: Managing materialities in a south‐eastern village community, Estonia Rethinking class, capitalism and exploitation from the perspective of family farming in Aotearoa/New Zealand Personal, peaceful, progressive: Integration workers’ narratives of refugee settlement and the rural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1