Personal, peaceful, progressive: Integration workers’ narratives of refugee settlement and the rural

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Sociologia Ruralis Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1111/soru.12464
Turid Sætermo, G. Kristensen
{"title":"Personal, peaceful, progressive: Integration workers’ narratives of refugee settlement and the rural","authors":"Turid Sætermo, G. Kristensen","doi":"10.1111/soru.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlement of refugees in rural areas in Norway is part of a national strategy to counter depopulation and thus links to ideas of revitalization and more promising futures for these areas. It also links up to an idea of smaller communities as ‘better at integrating’, as smaller communities both enable and necessitate more contact between the original population and newcomers. However, although some municipalities reap advantages of the dispersed settlement policy and succeed in retaining settled refugees, other municipalities ‘fail’. This article explores how the integration of refugees in rural communities is interpreted by public integration workers in two rural–coastal municipalities where the outcomes differ significantly. Drawing on 15 qualitative interviews, we discuss how integration workers make sense of local integration efforts, and how notions of the rural are (re)produced through their integration narratives. The analysis finds that the integration narratives draw on and reproduce both distinct and overlapping imaginaries of rural areas. We identify two main imaginaries: the rural as future‐oriented and dynamic, and the rural as close‐knit and peaceful.","PeriodicalId":47985,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia Ruralis","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia Ruralis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Settlement of refugees in rural areas in Norway is part of a national strategy to counter depopulation and thus links to ideas of revitalization and more promising futures for these areas. It also links up to an idea of smaller communities as ‘better at integrating’, as smaller communities both enable and necessitate more contact between the original population and newcomers. However, although some municipalities reap advantages of the dispersed settlement policy and succeed in retaining settled refugees, other municipalities ‘fail’. This article explores how the integration of refugees in rural communities is interpreted by public integration workers in two rural–coastal municipalities where the outcomes differ significantly. Drawing on 15 qualitative interviews, we discuss how integration workers make sense of local integration efforts, and how notions of the rural are (re)produced through their integration narratives. The analysis finds that the integration narratives draw on and reproduce both distinct and overlapping imaginaries of rural areas. We identify two main imaginaries: the rural as future‐oriented and dynamic, and the rural as close‐knit and peaceful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人的、和平的、进步的:融合工作者对难民安置和农村的叙述
在挪威农村地区安置难民是应对人口减少的国家战略的一部分,因此与振兴这些地区的想法和更有希望的未来联系在一起。它还与一个小社区“更善于融合”的想法联系在一起,因为小社区既能使原始人口和新移民之间有更多的接触,也需要更多的接触。然而,尽管一些城市从分散安置政策中获益,并成功地留住了已定居的难民,但其他城市“失败了”。本文探讨了两个农村沿海城市的公共融合工作者如何解释农村社区难民的融合,其中结果差异很大。通过15个定性访谈,我们讨论了融合工作者如何理解当地的融合努力,以及如何通过他们的融合叙事(再)产生农村的概念。分析发现,整合叙事借鉴并再现了不同的、重叠的乡村想象。我们确定了两种主要的想象:面向未来和充满活力的农村,以及紧密联系和和平的农村。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologia Ruralis
Sociologia Ruralis Multiple-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Sociologia Ruralis reflects the diversity of European social-science research on rural areas and related issues. The complexity and diversity of rural problems require multi and interdisciplinary approaches. Over the past 40 years Sociologia Ruralis has been an international forum for social scientists engaged in a wide variety of disciplines focusing on social, political and cultural aspects of rural development. Sociologia Ruralis covers a wide range of subjects, ranging from farming, natural resources and food systems to rural communities, rural identities and the restructuring of rurality.
期刊最新文献
New immigration destinations in Sweden: Migrant residential trajectories intersecting rural areas Sacred serpents and the discourse on conservation: Interrogating interspecies dynamics in rural Bardhaman Stewardship and everyday governance: Managing materialities in a south‐eastern village community, Estonia Rethinking class, capitalism and exploitation from the perspective of family farming in Aotearoa/New Zealand Personal, peaceful, progressive: Integration workers’ narratives of refugee settlement and the rural
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1