Water Productivity, Economic Viability and Yield of Rice under Different Rice Establishment Methods

Ramesh T, Rathika S, Subramanian E, Vijayakumar S
{"title":"Water Productivity, Economic Viability and Yield of Rice under Different Rice Establishment Methods","authors":"Ramesh T, Rathika S, Subramanian E, Vijayakumar S","doi":"10.58297/vfvb6889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted during the kharif (2013) at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute (TRRI), Aduthurai to evaluate the productivity and input usage of different rice establishment methods viz., wet direct seeding using drum seeder, dry direct seeding using tractor operated seed drill, and conventional transplanting. Data reveal that dry seeding using a tractor drawn seed drill utilized a lower seed rate of 30 kg/ha compared to wet seeding (37.5 kg/ha) and transplanted rice (60 kg/ha). The plant height and plant population did not exhibit significant variations across the different establishment methods. However, yield attributes like ear bearing tillers (396/m2 ) and filled grains (137/panicle) were significantly higher in transplanted rice. Nonetheless, dry seeded rice recorded a grain yield of 6040 kg/ha which was only 5.5% lower than that of transplanted rice. Notably, dry seeding conserved 32.6% of irrigation water and reduced labour requirement by 48.9% compared to transplanted rice. Moreover, dry seeded rice exhibited higher water productivity (6.40 kg/ha/mm) and a higher benefit cost ratio (2.66) as compared to other establishment methods. Therefore, considering the existing water crisis and labour shortage, the adoption of dry seeding for rice cultivation holds promise as a viable solution for farmers. This method not only addresses the challenges posed by limited water availability and the scarcity of labour but also maintains satisfactory levels of productivity","PeriodicalId":17022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rice Research and Developments","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rice Research and Developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58297/vfvb6889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif (2013) at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute (TRRI), Aduthurai to evaluate the productivity and input usage of different rice establishment methods viz., wet direct seeding using drum seeder, dry direct seeding using tractor operated seed drill, and conventional transplanting. Data reveal that dry seeding using a tractor drawn seed drill utilized a lower seed rate of 30 kg/ha compared to wet seeding (37.5 kg/ha) and transplanted rice (60 kg/ha). The plant height and plant population did not exhibit significant variations across the different establishment methods. However, yield attributes like ear bearing tillers (396/m2 ) and filled grains (137/panicle) were significantly higher in transplanted rice. Nonetheless, dry seeded rice recorded a grain yield of 6040 kg/ha which was only 5.5% lower than that of transplanted rice. Notably, dry seeding conserved 32.6% of irrigation water and reduced labour requirement by 48.9% compared to transplanted rice. Moreover, dry seeded rice exhibited higher water productivity (6.40 kg/ha/mm) and a higher benefit cost ratio (2.66) as compared to other establishment methods. Therefore, considering the existing water crisis and labour shortage, the adoption of dry seeding for rice cultivation holds promise as a viable solution for farmers. This method not only addresses the challenges posed by limited water availability and the scarcity of labour but also maintains satisfactory levels of productivity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同建稻方式下水稻水分生产力、经济活力及产量
2013年秋,在泰米尔纳德邦水稻研究所(TRRI)进行了一项田间试验,以评估不同水稻种植方法的生产力和投入使用情况,即使用滚筒播种机进行湿式直接播种,使用拖拉机操作播种机进行干式直接播种和常规移栽。数据显示,与湿播(37.5公斤/公顷)和移栽水稻(60公斤/公顷)相比,使用拖拉机播种机干播的播种率为30公斤/公顷。不同设置方法对株高和种群数量的影响不显著。移栽水稻的实穗分蘖数(396个/m2)和实粒数(137个/穗)显著高于移栽水稻。干播水稻的产量为6040公斤/公顷,仅比移栽水稻低5.5%。值得注意的是,与插秧相比,干播节约了32.6%的灌溉用水,减少了48.9%的劳动力需求。干播水稻的水分生产力为6.40 kg/ha/mm,效益成本比为2.66。因此,考虑到现有的水危机和劳动力短缺,采用旱作播种水稻种植对农民来说是一个可行的解决方案。这种方法不仅解决了水供应有限和劳动力短缺所带来的挑战,而且还保持了令人满意的生产力水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Plant's Role in Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Furrow-irrigated Rice Missed Nursing Care in a Second-Level Surgical Care Area in Northern Italy: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Study of the Effect of Sowing Date and Sowing Method on Yield of New Rice Varieties in the Senegal River Valley under Low Temperatures Flood-Irrigated Rice Response to Fertilizer-Phosphorus Sources in a Phosphorus-Deficient Silt-Loam Soil Evaluation of Rice Varieties Under Different Crop Management Options in Rainfed and Drought Prone Ecology of Jharkhand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1