Flood-Irrigated Rice Response to Fertilizer-Phosphorus Sources in a Phosphorus-Deficient Silt-Loam Soil

Omidire Niyi S, B. Kristofor R, Lunga Diego Della, Roberts Trenton L
{"title":"Flood-Irrigated Rice Response to Fertilizer-Phosphorus Sources in a Phosphorus-Deficient Silt-Loam Soil","authors":"Omidire Niyi S, B. Kristofor R, Lunga Diego Della, Roberts Trenton L","doi":"10.36959/973/442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant macronutrient that is commonly applied as a fertilizer for optimal crop production. As the global supply of fertilizer-P sources, mainly derived from mined rock phosphate (RP), is decreasing, alternative nutrient sources need to be developed and tested, such a wastewater-recovered struvite-P materials. The objective of this greenhouse study was to evaluate below-and aboveground rice ( Oryza sativa ) response to various fertilizer-P sources [ i.e., mono-and diammonium phosphate (MAP and DAP, respectively), triple superphosphate (TSP), RP, electrochemically and chemically precipitated struvite (ECST and CPST, respectively), and an unamended control (UC) ] under flood-irrigation in a P-deficient, silt-loam soil. Of the 17 belowground properties evaluated, eight differed ( P < 0.05) among fertilizer-P sources, while three were at least numerically largest from CPST. Of the 17 aboveground properties evaluated, six differed ( P < 0.05) among fertilizer-P sources and all six were at least numerically largest from MAP or DAP. For all 22 rice properties that differed ( P < 0.05) among fertilizer-P-sources, either ECST, CPST, or both had a similar response to TSP, DAP, and/or MAP, while belowground P and calcium (Ca) and grain potassium (K) concentrations from CPST were greater ( P < 0.05) than from TSP, DAP, or MAP. Results demonstrated that struvite-P sources (i.e., ECST and CPST) are a viable, alternative fertilizer-P source, as evidenced by the large frequency of similar rice responses to other commercially available fertilizer-P sources commonly used for flood-irrigated rice production on a silt-loam soil in Arkansas (i.e., TSP, DAP, or MAP).","PeriodicalId":17022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rice Research and Developments","volume":" 876","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rice Research and Developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/973/442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an essential plant macronutrient that is commonly applied as a fertilizer for optimal crop production. As the global supply of fertilizer-P sources, mainly derived from mined rock phosphate (RP), is decreasing, alternative nutrient sources need to be developed and tested, such a wastewater-recovered struvite-P materials. The objective of this greenhouse study was to evaluate below-and aboveground rice ( Oryza sativa ) response to various fertilizer-P sources [ i.e., mono-and diammonium phosphate (MAP and DAP, respectively), triple superphosphate (TSP), RP, electrochemically and chemically precipitated struvite (ECST and CPST, respectively), and an unamended control (UC) ] under flood-irrigation in a P-deficient, silt-loam soil. Of the 17 belowground properties evaluated, eight differed ( P < 0.05) among fertilizer-P sources, while three were at least numerically largest from CPST. Of the 17 aboveground properties evaluated, six differed ( P < 0.05) among fertilizer-P sources and all six were at least numerically largest from MAP or DAP. For all 22 rice properties that differed ( P < 0.05) among fertilizer-P-sources, either ECST, CPST, or both had a similar response to TSP, DAP, and/or MAP, while belowground P and calcium (Ca) and grain potassium (K) concentrations from CPST were greater ( P < 0.05) than from TSP, DAP, or MAP. Results demonstrated that struvite-P sources (i.e., ECST and CPST) are a viable, alternative fertilizer-P source, as evidenced by the large frequency of similar rice responses to other commercially available fertilizer-P sources commonly used for flood-irrigated rice production on a silt-loam soil in Arkansas (i.e., TSP, DAP, or MAP).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洪水灌溉水稻对缺磷淤泥质土壤中磷肥源的响应
磷(P)是植物必需的大量营养元素,通常作为肥料施用,以优化作物生产。由于全球肥料磷源(主要来自开采的磷矿石)的供应正在减少,因此需要开发和测试替代营养源,如废水回收的结构磷材料。这项温室研究的目的是评估水稻(Oryza sativa)在缺钾的淤泥质土壤中,在洪水灌溉条件下对各种肥料-磷源(即磷酸一铵(MAP)和磷酸二铵(DAP)、三过磷酸钙(TSP)、RP、电化学沉淀和化学沉淀石英(ECST 和 CPST),以及未加改良的对照(UC))的地下和地上反应。在所评估的 17 种地下特性中,有 8 种在肥料-磷来源之间存在差异(P < 0.05),而有 3 种至少在数值上是 CPST 的最大值。在所评估的 17 种地上部分特性中,有 6 种因肥料-磷来源不同而存在差异(P < 0.05),所有 6 种因 MAP 或 DAP 而至少在数值上最大。对于肥料-磷来源之间存在差异(P < 0.05)的所有 22 种水稻特性,ECST、CPST 或两者与 TSP、DAP 和/或 MAP 的反应相似,而 CPST 的地下磷、钙(Ca)和谷物钾(K)浓度高于 TSP、DAP 或 MAP(P < 0.05)。结果表明,结构磷源(即 ECST 和 CPST)是一种可行的替代性肥料磷源,这一点从水稻对阿肯色州淤泥质土壤上常用于灌溉水稻生产的其他市售肥料磷源(即 TSP、DAP 或 MAP)的大量类似反应中可见一斑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Plant's Role in Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Furrow-irrigated Rice Missed Nursing Care in a Second-Level Surgical Care Area in Northern Italy: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Study of the Effect of Sowing Date and Sowing Method on Yield of New Rice Varieties in the Senegal River Valley under Low Temperatures Flood-Irrigated Rice Response to Fertilizer-Phosphorus Sources in a Phosphorus-Deficient Silt-Loam Soil Evaluation of Rice Varieties Under Different Crop Management Options in Rainfed and Drought Prone Ecology of Jharkhand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1