THE USE OF DEFECTIVE VERBS IN ENGLISH ESSAYS BY THE STUDENTS OF LEVEL III OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DOBA IN CHAD, ACADEMIC SESSION 2022-2023

Ndikoua Ngaidandi
{"title":"THE USE OF DEFECTIVE VERBS IN ENGLISH ESSAYS BY THE STUDENTS OF LEVEL III OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DOBA IN CHAD, ACADEMIC SESSION 2022-2023","authors":"Ndikoua Ngaidandi","doi":"10.59009/ijlllc.2023.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigated the use of defective verbs. The data were collected by the means of written continuous assessment administered to one hundred and fifty EFL learners of English Department of the University of Doba. They were analyzed through Corder’s (1967) Error Analysis (EA) approach. The results of this study revealed that those students encountered a lot of difficulties in using defective verbs in their essays. Five types of errors have been identified. These include the insertion of complete infinitive after defective verbs, the adding of ‘-ed’ at the end of defective verbs, the use of preterit after defective verbs, the adding of ‘s’ at the end of defective verbs and the use of ‘do’ with defective verbs in negative form and interrogative form. The analysis indicated that 37.81% of error regarded the insertion of complete infinitive after defective verbs, 18.48% concerned the adding of ‘-ed’ at the end of defective verbs, 17.64% concerned the use of preterit after defective verbs, 15.96% concerned the adding of ‘s’ at the end of defective verbs and 10.08% regarded the use of ‘do’ with defective verbs. These errors are influenced by the phenomenon of overgeneralization of English grammatical rules on the one hand and the lack of mastery of the use of defective verbs on the other hand.","PeriodicalId":486552,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language Linguistics Literature and Culture","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language Linguistics Literature and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59009/ijlllc.2023.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigated the use of defective verbs. The data were collected by the means of written continuous assessment administered to one hundred and fifty EFL learners of English Department of the University of Doba. They were analyzed through Corder’s (1967) Error Analysis (EA) approach. The results of this study revealed that those students encountered a lot of difficulties in using defective verbs in their essays. Five types of errors have been identified. These include the insertion of complete infinitive after defective verbs, the adding of ‘-ed’ at the end of defective verbs, the use of preterit after defective verbs, the adding of ‘s’ at the end of defective verbs and the use of ‘do’ with defective verbs in negative form and interrogative form. The analysis indicated that 37.81% of error regarded the insertion of complete infinitive after defective verbs, 18.48% concerned the adding of ‘-ed’ at the end of defective verbs, 17.64% concerned the use of preterit after defective verbs, 15.96% concerned the adding of ‘s’ at the end of defective verbs and 10.08% regarded the use of ‘do’ with defective verbs. These errors are influenced by the phenomenon of overgeneralization of English grammatical rules on the one hand and the lack of mastery of the use of defective verbs on the other hand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022-2023学年度乍得doba大学英语系三级学生英语作文中缺陷动词的使用
本文研究了动词残缺的用法。本研究采用书面连续评估的方法,对150名来自Doba大学英语系的英语学习者进行评估。他们通过Corder(1967)的误差分析(EA)方法进行分析。本研究的结果表明,这些学生在论文中使用缺陷动词时遇到了很多困难。已经确定了五种类型的错误。这些包括在缺陷动词后插入完整不定式,在缺陷动词后加“-ed”,在缺陷动词后使用优先级,在缺陷动词后加“s”,以及在否定形式和疑问形式中对缺陷动词使用“do”。分析表明,37.81%的错误与缺陷动词后插入完整不定式有关,18.48%的错误与缺陷动词后添加“-ed”有关,17.64%的错误与缺陷动词后使用优先级有关,15.96%的错误与缺陷动词后添加“s”有关,10.08%的错误与缺陷动词后使用“do”有关。这些错误一方面是由于对英语语法规则的过度概括,另一方面是由于对缺陷动词的使用掌握不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SCAPEGOATED PECOLA: THE MAKING OF A TRAUMATIZED CHARACTER IN TONI MORISON’S THE BLUEST EYE THE USE OF DEFECTIVE VERBS IN ENGLISH ESSAYS BY THE STUDENTS OF LEVEL III OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF DOBA IN CHAD, ACADEMIC SESSION 2022-2023 THE FUNCTIONS OF GODDESS LAKSHMI HOPEFULNESS AND FRUSTRATION IN DOMESTIC LIFE IN MANJU KAPUR’S A MARRIED WOMEN EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF CULTURE ON LANGUAGE LEARNING: HOW UNDERSTANDING CULTURAL CONTEXT AND VALUES CAN DEEPEN LANGUAGE ACQUISITION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1