Comparison between two Different Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia among Geriatric Patients in Hemiarthroplasty Surgery

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.26502/acc.060
Begum SA, Mahabubuzzaman M, Kumar D, Iqbal MJ, Kabir MH, Sheikh MZA, Bhari P, Rahman AKMS, Kabir MSH, Kabir MH
{"title":"Comparison between two Different Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia among Geriatric Patients in Hemiarthroplasty Surgery","authors":"Begum SA, Mahabubuzzaman M, Kumar D, Iqbal MJ, Kabir MH, Sheikh MZA, Bhari P, Rahman AKMS, Kabir MSH, Kabir MH","doi":"10.26502/acc.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The advantage of unilateral spinal anaesthesia is that it provides a stronger block on the side of surgery, accelerated recovery of the nerve block with better maintenance of cardiovascular stability. Hence it could be a suitable technique for high risk geriatric patients. Objective: To compare two different doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in unilateral spinal anaesthesia among geriatric patients in hemiarthroplasty surgery. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics Rehabilitation (NITOR), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Total 60 geriatric patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery were enrolled and divided into two groups (30 patients in each group). Group A was received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 µg fentanyl and Group B was received 7.50 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 µg fentanyl. The time onset of sensory and motor block, level of sensory and degree of motor block and the duration of sensory and motor block were assessed accordingly. Results: No significant difference was found in duration of surgery, onset of sensory and motor block on operative limb between the groups (p >0.05). The haemodynamic parameters were well maintained in group B. The time for 1st demand of analgesia, time of complete sensory and motor recovery was significantly earlier in group B (p <0.05). The higher dose had developed comparatively high peri-operative complications. Conclusion: Unilateral spinal block with a low dose of local anesthetic is safe and effective method for hemiarthroplasty surgery in geriatric patients","PeriodicalId":41147,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/acc.060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The advantage of unilateral spinal anaesthesia is that it provides a stronger block on the side of surgery, accelerated recovery of the nerve block with better maintenance of cardiovascular stability. Hence it could be a suitable technique for high risk geriatric patients. Objective: To compare two different doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine in unilateral spinal anaesthesia among geriatric patients in hemiarthroplasty surgery. Methods: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics Rehabilitation (NITOR), Dhaka, Bangladesh. Total 60 geriatric patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty surgery were enrolled and divided into two groups (30 patients in each group). Group A was received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 µg fentanyl and Group B was received 7.50 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 20 µg fentanyl. The time onset of sensory and motor block, level of sensory and degree of motor block and the duration of sensory and motor block were assessed accordingly. Results: No significant difference was found in duration of surgery, onset of sensory and motor block on operative limb between the groups (p >0.05). The haemodynamic parameters were well maintained in group B. The time for 1st demand of analgesia, time of complete sensory and motor recovery was significantly earlier in group B (p <0.05). The higher dose had developed comparatively high peri-operative complications. Conclusion: Unilateral spinal block with a low dose of local anesthetic is safe and effective method for hemiarthroplasty surgery in geriatric patients
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年半关节置换术患者单侧脊髓麻醉中两种不同剂量高压布比卡因的比较
背景:单侧脊髓麻醉的优点是在手术侧提供更强的阻滞,加速神经阻滞的恢复,更好地维持心血管的稳定性。因此,它可能是一种适合高风险老年患者的技术。目的:比较两种不同剂量的高压布比卡因在老年半关节置换术患者单侧脊髓麻醉中的作用。方法:本随机对照临床试验在孟加拉国达卡国立创伤与骨科康复研究所(NITOR)麻醉与重症监护医学科进行。本研究共纳入60例行半关节置换术的老年患者,并分为两组(每组30例)。A组给予高压布比卡因10 mg +芬太尼20µg, B组给予高压布比卡因7.50 mg +芬太尼20µg。评估感觉和运动阻滞的发生时间、感觉和运动阻滞的程度以及感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间。结果:两组患者手术时间、手术肢体感觉、运动阻滞发生时间差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。B组血流动力学参数维持较好,镇痛第一次需要时间、感觉和运动完全恢复时间均明显早于B组(p <0.05)。剂量越大围手术期并发症越严重。结论:单侧脊髓阻滞加小剂量局麻是治疗老年患者半关节置换术安全有效的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant with Lignocaine Adrenaline and Bupivacaine for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgery Effect of Prolonged Preoperative Fasting on Intraoperative Glycaemia in Pediatric Surgery at the Essos-Cameroun Hospital Center (Cameroon) Comparison between two Different Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia among Geriatric Patients in Hemiarthroplasty Surgery Combination of Entropy and Electroencephalograpy for Deep of Hypnosis Monitoring Improvement during General Anesthesia Comparison of Adverse Effects Related To the Use of Epidural Anesthesia versus Spinal Anesthesia In Cesarean Section Patients At The Plaza De La Salud General Hospital In Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, During The Period January-December 2021: A Retrospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1