Using National Agricultural Statistics Service pest management practices survey to assess IPM adoption in California

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Integrated Pest Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jipm/pmad022
James J Farrar
{"title":"Using National Agricultural Statistics Service pest management practices survey to assess IPM adoption in California","authors":"James J Farrar","doi":"10.1093/jipm/pmad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Data from the pest management practices survey conducted annually by the National Agriculture Statistics Service were used to estimate the adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) in California. Surveys indicate 75% or greater use rates by acreage of 11 pest management practices in vegetable crop production in 2022 and 7 pest management practices in fruit and nut crop production in 2021. Agronomic crops have fewer pest management practices used on 75% or more of the acreage, with 4 in cotton in 2019, 6 in rice in 2021, 4 in wheat in 2022, and none in barley in 2019. Scouting for diseases, insects and mites, and weeds is the most widely used pest management practice in all the crops. Differences between use rates measured by acreage and use rates measured by farming operations suggest that large and small operations use different pest management practices. Trends indicate flat to increasing use of many pest management practices in general but decreasing use of some pest management practices in small grain crops. Changes in pest management practices and use rates are influenced by many factors, including University of California IPM efforts, changes in pesticide regulations, changes in crop production practices, and consumer pressures. The information from these surveys will support the development of Extension IPM outreach materials by the University of California Statewide IPM Program.","PeriodicalId":16119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Pest Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmad022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Data from the pest management practices survey conducted annually by the National Agriculture Statistics Service were used to estimate the adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) in California. Surveys indicate 75% or greater use rates by acreage of 11 pest management practices in vegetable crop production in 2022 and 7 pest management practices in fruit and nut crop production in 2021. Agronomic crops have fewer pest management practices used on 75% or more of the acreage, with 4 in cotton in 2019, 6 in rice in 2021, 4 in wheat in 2022, and none in barley in 2019. Scouting for diseases, insects and mites, and weeds is the most widely used pest management practice in all the crops. Differences between use rates measured by acreage and use rates measured by farming operations suggest that large and small operations use different pest management practices. Trends indicate flat to increasing use of many pest management practices in general but decreasing use of some pest management practices in small grain crops. Changes in pest management practices and use rates are influenced by many factors, including University of California IPM efforts, changes in pesticide regulations, changes in crop production practices, and consumer pressures. The information from these surveys will support the development of Extension IPM outreach materials by the University of California Statewide IPM Program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用国家农业统计局有害生物管理实践调查来评估加州IPM的采用
摘要:利用国家农业统计局每年进行的有害生物管理实践调查的数据来估计加利福尼亚州采用综合有害生物管理(IPM)的情况。调查显示,到2022年,蔬菜作物生产中11项有害生物防治措施的使用率将达到75%或更高,到2021年,水果和坚果作物生产中7项有害生物防治措施的使用率将达到75%或更高。农艺作物在75%或更多的种植面积上使用的有害生物管理措施较少,2019年棉花使用4种,2021年水稻使用6种,2022年小麦使用4种,2019年大麦没有使用。寻找病虫害、虫螨和杂草是所有作物中最广泛使用的病虫害管理方法。按面积衡量的利用率与按农业经营衡量的利用率之间的差异表明,大型和小型经营采用不同的虫害管理做法。趋势表明,一般来说,许多有害生物管理方法的使用增加,但在小粮食作物中,某些有害生物管理方法的使用减少。有害生物管理方法和使用率的变化受到许多因素的影响,包括加州大学IPM的努力、农药法规的变化、作物生产方法的变化以及消费者的压力。来自这些调查的信息将支持加州大学全州IPM计划扩展IPM外展材料的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Journal of Integrated Pest Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
24
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Integrated Pest Management is an open access, peer-reviewed, extension journal covering the field of integrated pest management. The Editors-in-Chief are Dr. Marlin E. Rice (formerly with Iowa State University) and Dr. Kevin L. Steffey (formerly with the University of Illinois). The journal is multi-disciplinary in scope, publishing articles in all pest management disciplines, including entomology, nematology, plant pathology, weed science, and other subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Grower perceptions and adoption of IPM and non-Bt refuge in field corn: a survey in North and South Carolina Agricultural issues with climate change—case studies with 3 soybean pests: Johnsongrass, kudzu bug, and charcoal rot Gendered barriers and opportunities for scaling integrated pest management practices along the mango value chain in Kenya Forecasting the population development of within-season insect crop pests in sub-Saharan Africa: the Pest Risk Information Service Assessment of insecticide risk quantification methods: Introducing the Pesticide Risk Tool and its improvements over the Environmental Impact Quotient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1