Grower perceptions and adoption of IPM and non-Bt refuge in field corn: a survey in North and South Carolina

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Integrated Pest Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jipm/pmad030
Tim B Bryant, Jeremy Greene, D. Reisig, F. Reay-Jones
{"title":"Grower perceptions and adoption of IPM and non-Bt refuge in field corn: a survey in North and South Carolina","authors":"Tim B Bryant, Jeremy Greene, D. Reisig, F. Reay-Jones","doi":"10.1093/jipm/pmad030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Production of field corn in the southeastern United States is often impacted by a number of insect pests. However, surveys to assess stakeholder perception of the relative importance of insect pests and adopted management decisions for these pests have not been extensively reported in the region. A survey was conducted in North and South Carolina to address deficiencies in our knowledge about how corn producers perceive insect pests, implement management and insect resistance strategies, and understand and implement integrated pest management (IPM). The survey indicated that stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), were the most commonly managed insect pests in field corn. For transgenic corn expressing insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (Berliner), the rate of resistance management (i.e., planting of non-Bt corn refuge) implemented (59%) by growers was higher than previously reported. The majority of grower respondents identified ear development as the most critical corn growth stage for managing stink bugs (52%), with the most commonly reported management strategy being applications of insecticide at the economic threshold. Growers also reported understanding the concepts of IPM and implementing it in field corn. Assessing the adoption of preventative approaches, such as Bt corn and insecticide seed treatments, and strategies to manage insect resistance, in the case of Bt corn in particular, is critical for tailoring research and Extension efforts to protect the durability of these management tactics.","PeriodicalId":16119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Pest Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmad030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Production of field corn in the southeastern United States is often impacted by a number of insect pests. However, surveys to assess stakeholder perception of the relative importance of insect pests and adopted management decisions for these pests have not been extensively reported in the region. A survey was conducted in North and South Carolina to address deficiencies in our knowledge about how corn producers perceive insect pests, implement management and insect resistance strategies, and understand and implement integrated pest management (IPM). The survey indicated that stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), were the most commonly managed insect pests in field corn. For transgenic corn expressing insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (Berliner), the rate of resistance management (i.e., planting of non-Bt corn refuge) implemented (59%) by growers was higher than previously reported. The majority of grower respondents identified ear development as the most critical corn growth stage for managing stink bugs (52%), with the most commonly reported management strategy being applications of insecticide at the economic threshold. Growers also reported understanding the concepts of IPM and implementing it in field corn. Assessing the adoption of preventative approaches, such as Bt corn and insecticide seed treatments, and strategies to manage insect resistance, in the case of Bt corn in particular, is critical for tailoring research and Extension efforts to protect the durability of these management tactics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大田玉米种植者对 IPM 和非 Bt 避虫措施的看法和采用情况:在北卡罗来纳州和南卡罗来纳州进行的一项调查
美国东南部的大田玉米生产经常受到一些虫害的影响。然而,该地区尚未广泛报道过通过调查来评估利益相关者对害虫相对重要性的认识以及针对这些害虫所采取的管理决策。我们在北卡罗来纳州和南卡罗来纳州进行了一项调查,以解决我们对玉米生产者如何看待虫害、如何实施管理和抗虫策略以及如何理解和实施虫害综合防治 (IPM) 的认识不足的问题。调查表明,蝽象(半翅目:Pentatomidae)和玉米穗虫 Helicoverpa zea (Boddie)(鳞翅目:Noctuidae)是大田玉米中最常见的害虫。对于表达苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bt)(Berliner)杀虫毒素的转基因玉米,种植者实施抗性管理(即种植非 Bt 玉米避难所)的比例(59%)高于之前的报告。大多数受访种植者认为,穗发育期是管理蝽象最关键的玉米生长阶段(52%),最常报告的管理策略是在经济临界点施用杀虫剂。种植者还表示了解虫害综合防治的概念,并在大田玉米中加以实施。评估预防性方法(如 Bt 玉米和杀虫剂种子处理)的采用情况,以及管理昆虫抗药性的策略(尤其是 Bt 玉米),对于调整研究和推广工作以保护这些管理策略的持久性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Pest Management
Journal of Integrated Pest Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
24
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Integrated Pest Management is an open access, peer-reviewed, extension journal covering the field of integrated pest management. The Editors-in-Chief are Dr. Marlin E. Rice (formerly with Iowa State University) and Dr. Kevin L. Steffey (formerly with the University of Illinois). The journal is multi-disciplinary in scope, publishing articles in all pest management disciplines, including entomology, nematology, plant pathology, weed science, and other subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Grower perceptions and adoption of IPM and non-Bt refuge in field corn: a survey in North and South Carolina Agricultural issues with climate change—case studies with 3 soybean pests: Johnsongrass, kudzu bug, and charcoal rot Gendered barriers and opportunities for scaling integrated pest management practices along the mango value chain in Kenya Forecasting the population development of within-season insect crop pests in sub-Saharan Africa: the Pest Risk Information Service Assessment of insecticide risk quantification methods: Introducing the Pesticide Risk Tool and its improvements over the Environmental Impact Quotient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1