Integrating standard and network psychometrics to assess the quality of prison life in Serbia

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1177/26338076231208769
Janko Međedović, Nikola Drndarević, Milena Milićević
{"title":"Integrating standard and network psychometrics to assess the quality of prison life in Serbia","authors":"Janko Međedović, Nikola Drndarević, Milena Milićević","doi":"10.1177/26338076231208769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present research, we analysed the properties of the Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) survey in Serbia; it assesses five dimensions of prisoners’ well-being (harmony, professionalism, security, conditions and family contact, and well-being and development) composed of 21 narrow scales. The participants were 650 prisoners serving sentences in five prisons. Reliabilities (measured by both Cronbach's alphas and test–retest correlations) were high for most narrow scales and excellent for global scales. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory fit of the model although the MQPL dimensions showed high intercorrelations (indicating elevated informational redundancy). The validity of the scales was established by detecting positive correlations with the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scale and by capturing the differences between the five prisons in which the data were collected. We used network analysis to detect the most central nodes in MQPL: analysis on the dimension level revealed that harmony, professionalism, and well-being and development had high centrality. Estimating the network on the level of narrow scales demonstrated that prisoners’ well-being, organisation and consistency in prison activities, and help and assistance from prison staff were central aspects of their quality of life. Therefore, the present findings show that MQPL scales have high reliability and validity, the model fits the empirical data, and the central aspects of prisoners’ quality of life are identified; at the same time, we also analysed the limitations of MQPL. In general, the results suggest that MQPL is a valuable tool for assessing the quality of life and social climate in prisons.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"73 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231208769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present research, we analysed the properties of the Measuring the Quality of Prison Life (MQPL) survey in Serbia; it assesses five dimensions of prisoners’ well-being (harmony, professionalism, security, conditions and family contact, and well-being and development) composed of 21 narrow scales. The participants were 650 prisoners serving sentences in five prisons. Reliabilities (measured by both Cronbach's alphas and test–retest correlations) were high for most narrow scales and excellent for global scales. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory fit of the model although the MQPL dimensions showed high intercorrelations (indicating elevated informational redundancy). The validity of the scales was established by detecting positive correlations with the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scale and by capturing the differences between the five prisons in which the data were collected. We used network analysis to detect the most central nodes in MQPL: analysis on the dimension level revealed that harmony, professionalism, and well-being and development had high centrality. Estimating the network on the level of narrow scales demonstrated that prisoners’ well-being, organisation and consistency in prison activities, and help and assistance from prison staff were central aspects of their quality of life. Therefore, the present findings show that MQPL scales have high reliability and validity, the model fits the empirical data, and the central aspects of prisoners’ quality of life are identified; at the same time, we also analysed the limitations of MQPL. In general, the results suggest that MQPL is a valuable tool for assessing the quality of life and social climate in prisons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合标准和网络心理测量学来评估塞尔维亚监狱生活质量
在本研究中,我们分析了塞尔维亚监狱生活质量测量(MQPL)调查的性质;它评估囚犯福利的五个方面(和谐、专业、安全、条件和家庭联系、福利和发展),由21个狭窄的尺度组成。参与者是在五个监狱服刑的650名囚犯。信度(通过Cronbach's alpha和test-retest correlation来衡量)在大多数窄尺度上是高的,在全局尺度上是极好的。验证性因子分析显示,尽管MQPL维度显示出高度的相互关系(表明信息冗余度升高),但模型的拟合令人满意。通过检测与WHOQOL-BREF生活质量量表的正相关性,并通过捕获收集数据的五个监狱之间的差异,确定了量表的有效性。我们利用网络分析来检测MQPL中最中心的节点:维度水平上的分析表明,和谐、专业、幸福与发展具有较高的中心性。在狭窄尺度上对网络的估计表明,囚犯的福利、监狱活动的组织和一致性以及监狱工作人员的帮助和协助是他们生活质量的核心方面。因此,本研究结果表明,MQPL量表具有较高的信度和效度,模型与经验数据拟合,并识别出囚犯生活质量的核心方面;同时,我们也分析了MQPL的局限性。总的来说,结果表明MQPL是评估监狱生活质量和社会气候的一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Public views of sexual assault, and its prevention, in residential aged care facilities Intimate partner homicide in New Zealand, 2004–2019. Risk markers, demographic patterns, and prevalence Realisation of the principle of normalisation in the adoption of ICTs in a women's prison: A Finnish qualitative study Lived experiences at the intersection: Understanding the overlap of family violence and mental health for victim-survivors and consumers in Victoria, Australia Integrating standard and network psychometrics to assess the quality of prison life in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1