Public views of sexual assault, and its prevention, in residential aged care facilities

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminology Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1177/26338076231207406
Madeline Lee, Emily Moir, Nadine McKillop
{"title":"Public views of sexual assault, and its prevention, in residential aged care facilities","authors":"Madeline Lee, Emily Moir, Nadine McKillop","doi":"10.1177/26338076231207406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of sexual assaults against older people in Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs) is estimated to be more than double the incidents in the community, yet there is a paucity of empirical research focused on this context. Considering significant revelations and community concerns stemming from Australia's recent Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, the current study sought to assess public knowledge of sexual assaults in RACFs, specifically, the causes, delegations of responsibility, and possible solutions to limit reoccurrences. Thematic analysis was conducted on 2,398 social media comments made in response to posts concerning sexual assault in RACFs ( n = 27 sources). Results suggest systemic factors frequently contributed to incidents (e.g., staffing insufficiencies, apathetic management, and meagre regulatory requirements), while improved guardianship, sanctions, and regulation were expected to mitigate risk. Notably, the government was frequently blamed for its role in establishing and maintaining conditions that manifest in abuse within RACFs, with responsibility also delegated to family members. Importantly, public opinion strongly coincided with prior empirical prevention recommendations, endorsing the implementation of identified measures to limit sexual victimisation risk in RACFs.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"83 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231207406","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of sexual assaults against older people in Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACFs) is estimated to be more than double the incidents in the community, yet there is a paucity of empirical research focused on this context. Considering significant revelations and community concerns stemming from Australia's recent Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, the current study sought to assess public knowledge of sexual assaults in RACFs, specifically, the causes, delegations of responsibility, and possible solutions to limit reoccurrences. Thematic analysis was conducted on 2,398 social media comments made in response to posts concerning sexual assault in RACFs ( n = 27 sources). Results suggest systemic factors frequently contributed to incidents (e.g., staffing insufficiencies, apathetic management, and meagre regulatory requirements), while improved guardianship, sanctions, and regulation were expected to mitigate risk. Notably, the government was frequently blamed for its role in establishing and maintaining conditions that manifest in abuse within RACFs, with responsibility also delegated to family members. Importantly, public opinion strongly coincided with prior empirical prevention recommendations, endorsing the implementation of identified measures to limit sexual victimisation risk in RACFs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对养老院性侵犯及其预防的看法
据估计,寄宿式老年护理机构(RACFs)中针对老年人的性侵犯发生率是社区中发生率的两倍多,但针对这种情况的实证研究却少之又少。考虑到澳大利亚最近成立的皇家老年护理质量与安全委员会所揭示的重大问题和社会关注,本研究试图评估公众对养老院性侵犯的了解程度,特别是性侵犯的原因、责任归属,以及限制性侵犯再次发生的可能解决方案。本研究对 2,398 条社交媒体评论进行了主题分析,这些评论是针对有关 RACF 中性攻击事件的帖子(n = 27 个来源)发表的。结果表明,系统性因素经常导致事件的发生(例如,人员配备不足、管理冷漠和监管要求不严),而改善监护、制裁和监管则有望降低风险。值得注意的是,政府经常受到指责,因为它在建立和维持虐待儿童的条件方面扮演了重要角色,同时也将责任推给了家庭成员。重要的是,公众舆论与之前的经验性预防建议高度一致,赞同实施已确定的措施,以限制在住宿和儿童看护设施中发生性侵害的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Public views of sexual assault, and its prevention, in residential aged care facilities Intimate partner homicide in New Zealand, 2004–2019. Risk markers, demographic patterns, and prevalence Realisation of the principle of normalisation in the adoption of ICTs in a women's prison: A Finnish qualitative study Lived experiences at the intersection: Understanding the overlap of family violence and mental health for victim-survivors and consumers in Victoria, Australia Integrating standard and network psychometrics to assess the quality of prison life in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1