Sport and policy in ‘contested nations’: Analysing policy and political considerations in Taiwan and Scotland

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Review for the Sociology of Sport Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI:10.1177/10126902231212827
Ren-Shiang Jiang, Stuart Whigham
{"title":"Sport and policy in ‘contested nations’: Analysing policy and political considerations in Taiwan and Scotland","authors":"Ren-Shiang Jiang, Stuart Whigham","doi":"10.1177/10126902231212827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy learning from other international contexts is an important strategy during the sports policymaking process for the government of Taiwan, and recent research has examined potential parallels between Taiwan and Scotland with regards to sports policy. Although the status of Taiwan and Scotland is not the same, interesting comparisons can be made given their shared status as ‘contested nations’ that are often in the shadow of their closest neighbours with whom there is an uneasy political relationship – respectively, China and England. As a consequence, sport is regarded in both countries as an important vehicle for establishing and promoting a distinctive identity, albeit with contrasting political and policy considerations. Drawing upon 15 semi-structured interviews with sports policymakers and politicians from both Taiwanese and Scottish contexts, this paper critically examines the similarities and contrasts with regards to the political considerations which shape and constrain the nature of sport policy in each context. This analysis will focus on the role of central government, local government, sport policy organisations, and sporting National Governing Bodies in both Taiwan and Scotland, with particular emphasis on the position of sport within the broader policy, political, ideological and constitutional considerations for policymakers in each context.","PeriodicalId":47968,"journal":{"name":"International Review for the Sociology of Sport","volume":"81 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review for the Sociology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902231212827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy learning from other international contexts is an important strategy during the sports policymaking process for the government of Taiwan, and recent research has examined potential parallels between Taiwan and Scotland with regards to sports policy. Although the status of Taiwan and Scotland is not the same, interesting comparisons can be made given their shared status as ‘contested nations’ that are often in the shadow of their closest neighbours with whom there is an uneasy political relationship – respectively, China and England. As a consequence, sport is regarded in both countries as an important vehicle for establishing and promoting a distinctive identity, albeit with contrasting political and policy considerations. Drawing upon 15 semi-structured interviews with sports policymakers and politicians from both Taiwanese and Scottish contexts, this paper critically examines the similarities and contrasts with regards to the political considerations which shape and constrain the nature of sport policy in each context. This analysis will focus on the role of central government, local government, sport policy organisations, and sporting National Governing Bodies in both Taiwan and Scotland, with particular emphasis on the position of sport within the broader policy, political, ideological and constitutional considerations for policymakers in each context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“竞争国家”的体育和政策:分析台湾和苏格兰的政策和政治考虑
在台湾政府的体育政策制定过程中,从其他国际环境中学习政策是一项重要的策略,最近的研究调查了台湾和苏格兰在体育政策方面的潜在相似之处。尽管台湾和苏格兰的地位不同,但考虑到它们都是“有争议的国家”,经常处于与其政治关系不稳定的近邻中国和英国的阴影之下,可以进行有趣的比较。因此,体育在这两个国家都被视为建立和促进独特身份的重要工具,尽管在政治和政策方面有不同的考虑。通过对来自台湾和苏格兰的体育政策制定者和政治家的15次半结构化访谈,本文批判性地考察了在每种情况下塑造和限制体育政策性质的政治考虑方面的相似性和对比。本分析将集中在台湾和苏格兰的中央政府、地方政府、体育政策组织和体育国家管理机构的作用,特别强调体育在更广泛的政策、政治、意识形态和宪法考虑中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The International Review for the Sociology of Sport is a peer reviewed academic journal that is indexed on ISI. Eight issues are now published each year. The main purpose of the IRSS is to disseminate research and scholarship on sport throughout the international academic community. The journal publishes research articles of varying lengths, from standard length research papers to shorter reports and commentary, as well as book and media reviews. The International Review for the Sociology of Sport is not restricted to any theoretical or methodological perspective and brings together contributions from anthropology, cultural studies, geography, gender studies, media studies, history, political economy, semiotics, sociology, as well as interdisciplinary research.
期刊最新文献
Unicorns, rainbows, and unicorn magic: Storying new knowledge of black masculinities within the WWE Young refugees’ experiences of accumulating horizontal and vertical social capital through organised and informal sports The Qatar World Cup and Twitter sentiment: Unraveling the interplay of soft power, public opinion, and media scrutiny Surviving child sexual abuse in women's artistic gymnastics: ‘It's beautiful, because had I stayed in the past, I wouldn’t have evolved as a person’ ‘For those few minutes you are free’: The meaning of sport from imprisoned men's perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1