Individual vs community resilience: Case of Georgia

Zakaria Tavberidze, Anna Margvelashvili, Tamar Zurabishvili
{"title":"Individual vs community resilience: Case of Georgia","authors":"Zakaria Tavberidze, Anna Margvelashvili, Tamar Zurabishvili","doi":"10.15170/tm.2023.24.k4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present Paper examines the concepts of individual and community resilience in Georgia. The goal of the present paper is to investigate the interplay between individual and community resilience in the context of donor-funded initiatives at the local rural level through the creation and strengthening of Community-Based Organizations (CBO).
 Present findings are based on ample fieldwork conducted in Georgia in 2022 among the active rural CBOs, using a mixed-method approach: 1) a quantitative phone survey of CBOs; 2) Focus group discussions with beneficiaries of the CBOs’ activities (both online and face-to-face); 3) in-depth interviews with the leaders of the CBOs; 4) in-depth interviews with the representatives of the local self-government, and 5) expert interviews with representatives of donor organizations working to increase the resilience of local communities.
 Based on the data analysis and triangulation, the paper argues that resilience building in Georgian communities is mainly undertaken by the development partners using the top-down approach, and while on an individual level, these interventions do increase resilience, on a community level the impact is much less evident, and in some cases, non-existent. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are extremely relevant since this is the first attempt to analyze the concept of resilience in the Georgian context and the findings contribute to further future analysis in this regard. On a practical level, our findings could be instrumental for the developmental partners, working in this area in Georgia, to adjust their programming to achieve more sustainable results not only on the individual but community levels.","PeriodicalId":498008,"journal":{"name":"Tudás menedzsment","volume":"26 101","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tudás menedzsment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/tm.2023.24.k4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present Paper examines the concepts of individual and community resilience in Georgia. The goal of the present paper is to investigate the interplay between individual and community resilience in the context of donor-funded initiatives at the local rural level through the creation and strengthening of Community-Based Organizations (CBO). Present findings are based on ample fieldwork conducted in Georgia in 2022 among the active rural CBOs, using a mixed-method approach: 1) a quantitative phone survey of CBOs; 2) Focus group discussions with beneficiaries of the CBOs’ activities (both online and face-to-face); 3) in-depth interviews with the leaders of the CBOs; 4) in-depth interviews with the representatives of the local self-government, and 5) expert interviews with representatives of donor organizations working to increase the resilience of local communities. Based on the data analysis and triangulation, the paper argues that resilience building in Georgian communities is mainly undertaken by the development partners using the top-down approach, and while on an individual level, these interventions do increase resilience, on a community level the impact is much less evident, and in some cases, non-existent. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings are extremely relevant since this is the first attempt to analyze the concept of resilience in the Georgian context and the findings contribute to further future analysis in this regard. On a practical level, our findings could be instrumental for the developmental partners, working in this area in Georgia, to adjust their programming to achieve more sustainable results not only on the individual but community levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人与社区复原力:乔治亚州的案例
本论文探讨了格鲁吉亚个人和社区恢复力的概念。本文的目标是通过创建和加强社区组织(CBO),在捐助者资助的地方农村一级倡议的背景下,调查个人和社区复原力之间的相互作用。目前的研究结果是基于2022年在格鲁吉亚对活跃的农村cbo进行的大量实地调查,采用混合方法:1)对cbo进行定量电话调查;2)与社区组织活动的受益者进行焦点小组讨论(包括在线和面对面);3)对基层组织领导进行深度访谈;4)与当地自治政府代表的深度访谈;5)与致力于提高当地社区复原力的捐助组织代表的专家访谈;基于数据分析和三角测量,本文认为,格鲁吉亚社区的复原力建设主要由发展伙伴采用自上而下的方法进行,虽然在个人层面上,这些干预措施确实提高了复原力,但在社区层面上,其影响要明显得多,在某些情况下甚至不存在。我们的研究结果的理论和实践意义是非常相关的,因为这是第一次尝试分析格鲁吉亚背景下的弹性概念,研究结果有助于在这方面进一步的未来分析。在实际层面上,我们的研究结果可能有助于在格鲁吉亚这一领域工作的发展伙伴调整其规划,不仅在个人层面,而且在社区层面取得更可持续的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of museum learning in promoting sustainability - Comparative research in Baranya County and Landkreis Görlitz The Generation of ‘The Wandering Years’ – Traveling culture in Europe and in Hungary between the World Wars Individual vs community resilience: Case of Georgia Managing difference: Preliminary research to an enculturational care strategy in the triple periphery of Eastern Saxony, Lower Silesia and North-Eastern Bohemia The contemporary Mongolian cultural landscape: Cultural influences, language skills, and the impact of foreign cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1