V. Jagić and ukrainian question: The letter to F. E. Korsch

Mikhail Dmitrievic Bukharin
{"title":"V. Jagić and ukrainian question: The letter to F. E. Korsch","authors":"Mikhail Dmitrievic Bukharin","doi":"10.21638/spbu19.2023.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the key-points of the socio-political discourse in the Russian Empire in the XIX ‒ early XX centuries was Slavic question. Ukrainian question was its particular manifestation. The aggravation of discussions on the Slavic issues, as a rule, followed the dynamics of foreign policy. Interest in the Ukrainian issue increased due to the adoption of censorship measures by the Russian state, which varied from tightening to softening of the censorship regime. The Ukrainian question in Russian socio-political thought was debated mainly in the discussion, if the Ukrainian («Little Russian») people represent an independent ethnic group or is a local version of the «Great Russians». Depending on the answer to this question, the ideal structure of the Russian state was going to be worked out. The Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences took an active part in the discussion of the Slavic question in general (and that of Ukrainian in particular) and in the adoption of appropriate measures, acting as an expert body. Discussions were conducted not only at the institutional level, but also at the private one. In research literature, the scholarly world on this issue is divided into two camps, one of which (liberal-nationalist) was represented mainly by P. B. Struve, and the other — by his numerous opponents (for example, by F. E. Korsh). As documents from the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences show, the history of discussion on the Ukrainian issue before the First World War was broader, more scholars, also representing the Academy of sciences were involved. In particular, the position of one the most prominent European Slavist of the late XIX ‒ early XX centuries I. V. Jagić deserves attention. His position on the Ukrainian problem, which worried Jagić for several decades, is especially pronounced in the last letter to F. E. Korsh dated April 9 (22), 1912.","PeriodicalId":41089,"journal":{"name":"Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2023.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the key-points of the socio-political discourse in the Russian Empire in the XIX ‒ early XX centuries was Slavic question. Ukrainian question was its particular manifestation. The aggravation of discussions on the Slavic issues, as a rule, followed the dynamics of foreign policy. Interest in the Ukrainian issue increased due to the adoption of censorship measures by the Russian state, which varied from tightening to softening of the censorship regime. The Ukrainian question in Russian socio-political thought was debated mainly in the discussion, if the Ukrainian («Little Russian») people represent an independent ethnic group or is a local version of the «Great Russians». Depending on the answer to this question, the ideal structure of the Russian state was going to be worked out. The Imperial St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences took an active part in the discussion of the Slavic question in general (and that of Ukrainian in particular) and in the adoption of appropriate measures, acting as an expert body. Discussions were conducted not only at the institutional level, but also at the private one. In research literature, the scholarly world on this issue is divided into two camps, one of which (liberal-nationalist) was represented mainly by P. B. Struve, and the other — by his numerous opponents (for example, by F. E. Korsh). As documents from the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences show, the history of discussion on the Ukrainian issue before the First World War was broader, more scholars, also representing the Academy of sciences were involved. In particular, the position of one the most prominent European Slavist of the late XIX ‒ early XX centuries I. V. Jagić deserves attention. His position on the Ukrainian problem, which worried Jagić for several decades, is especially pronounced in the last letter to F. E. Korsh dated April 9 (22), 1912.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
五。贾季奇和乌克兰问题:给科尔施的信
斯拉夫问题是19世纪至20世纪初俄罗斯帝国社会政治话语的重点之一。乌克兰问题是其具体表现。通常,关于斯拉夫问题的讨论的加剧是随着外交政策的变化而变化的。对乌克兰问题的兴趣增加了,因为俄罗斯国家采取了审查措施,审查制度从收紧到软化不等。俄罗斯社会政治思想中的乌克兰问题主要在讨论中讨论,乌克兰人(“小俄罗斯人”)是代表一个独立的民族群体,还是“大俄罗斯人”的地方版本。这个问题的答案决定了俄国理想的国家结构。圣彼得堡帝国科学院作为一个专家机构,积极参加了关于斯拉夫问题(特别是乌克兰问题)的讨论,并采取了适当措施。讨论不仅在机构一级进行,而且在私人一级进行。在研究文献中,学术界在这个问题上分为两个阵营,一个阵营(自由民族主义者)主要以p·b·斯特鲁夫为代表,另一个阵营则以他的众多反对者为代表(例如,f·e·科尔什)。俄罗斯科学院档案馆的文件显示,在第一次世界大战之前,关于乌克兰问题的讨论历史更广泛,更多的学者,也代表着科学院参与其中。特别是,十九世纪末至二十世纪初最突出的欧洲斯拉夫主义者之一的地位值得注意。在1912年4月9日(22日)写给f·e·科尔什的最后一封信中,他对乌克兰问题的立场尤其明显,这一立场让贾季奇担心了几十年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Representation of the Council of ambassadors of the Russian diaspora in Bulgaria (1919–1940) Orders of Socialist Yugoslavia awarded to Russian diaspora representatives Six by five: Soviet and emigrant historians at the 7th International congress of historical sciences The cult of Josaphat Kuntsevych in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 17th century: Between religious intolerance and proselytism The veneration of the Ostrobram icon of the Mother of God in the context of Lithuanian identity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1