The stage-within-the-screen: Peter Brook’s film adaptation of King Lear

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE ARCADIA Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1515/arcadia-2023-2015
Paulo da Silva Gregório
{"title":"The stage-within-the-screen: Peter Brook’s film adaptation of <i>King Lear</i>","authors":"Paulo da Silva Gregório","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2023-2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In his film of King Lear (1971), Peter Brook reimagined his landmark production of the play on screen through an intricate interplay of theatrical and cinematic codes. This article revisits Brook’s adaptation, focusing on how its much-discussed debt to theatrical traditions relates to broader issues regarding the production and reception of Shakespearean films in the UK. I argue that the film’s overt affiliation to theatre sets it apart from other Anglophone adaptations of Shakespeare grounded in Hollywoodian conventions that broaden considerably their potential to reach a global audience across time and location. In establishing strong links between his film and the RSC production, Brook’s counter-cinematic approach to filmic storytelling, alongside his casting of acclaimed stage actors, asserted the authority of theatre as a privileged medium where Shakespeare is made to signify. We shall see that the various marks of site-specific theatrical traditions in the film underscore its appeal to a local – rather than global – audience, thus dismantling essentialist and universalist views of Anglophone adaptations of Shakespeare on screen.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2023-2015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In his film of King Lear (1971), Peter Brook reimagined his landmark production of the play on screen through an intricate interplay of theatrical and cinematic codes. This article revisits Brook’s adaptation, focusing on how its much-discussed debt to theatrical traditions relates to broader issues regarding the production and reception of Shakespearean films in the UK. I argue that the film’s overt affiliation to theatre sets it apart from other Anglophone adaptations of Shakespeare grounded in Hollywoodian conventions that broaden considerably their potential to reach a global audience across time and location. In establishing strong links between his film and the RSC production, Brook’s counter-cinematic approach to filmic storytelling, alongside his casting of acclaimed stage actors, asserted the authority of theatre as a privileged medium where Shakespeare is made to signify. We shall see that the various marks of site-specific theatrical traditions in the film underscore its appeal to a local – rather than global – audience, thus dismantling essentialist and universalist views of Anglophone adaptations of Shakespeare on screen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银幕中的舞台:彼得·布鲁克改编自《李尔王》的电影
在他的电影《李尔王》(1971)中,彼得·布鲁克通过戏剧和电影代码的错综复杂的相互作用,重新想象了他在银幕上的标志性作品。这篇文章重新审视了布鲁克的改编,重点是它对戏剧传统的广泛讨论是如何与英国莎士比亚电影的制作和接受相关的更广泛的问题。我认为,这部电影与戏剧的明显联系,使它与其他基于好莱坞惯例的莎士比亚英语改编电影区别开来,这些电影在很大程度上扩大了它们跨越时间和地点吸引全球观众的潜力。布鲁克在他的电影和皇家莎士比亚剧团的作品之间建立了紧密的联系,他采用了反电影的方式来讲述电影故事,加上他对著名舞台剧演员的选角,确立了戏剧作为一种特权媒介的权威,而莎士比亚正是在这种媒介中被创造出来的。我们将看到,电影中特定地点的戏剧传统的各种标志强调了它对当地而不是全球观众的吸引力,从而消除了英语版莎士比亚电影改编的本质主义和普遍主义观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARCADIA
ARCADIA LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.
期刊最新文献
Vera Zimmermann: Grenzenlos menschlich? Tierethische Positionen bei Elias Canetti, Marlen Haushofer und Brigitte Kronauer. Bielefeld: transcript, 2021. 274 S. Reimagining the Body Without Organs Through Exchange Value in Never Let Me Go Nizami, Profane Love and the Melancholy Tradition: Uncovering Amor Heroes in the Indian Princess’ Tale in Seven Beauties The stage-within-the-screen: Peter Brook’s film adaptation of King Lear Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1