Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1515/humaff-2023-0039
Kristina Broučková, Kateřina Labutta Kubíková
{"title":"Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age","authors":"Kristina Broučková, Kateřina Labutta Kubíková","doi":"10.1515/humaff-2023-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper aims to explore the changes that representative democracy is experiencing as a result of the transformation of communication channels. In particular, it focuses on non-electoral representation in the form of movements that emerged throughout the 2010s and that were defined by a strong social media presence (e.g. Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, Yellow Vests). Despite not attempting to gain political power via elections, these movements, through online and offline activities, nonetheless managed to shape the realm of politics. The paper thus analyzes the movements’ inner representative dynamics and the ways they reshape representative democracy. It engages with a critical reading of Hanna Pitkin’s concept of symbolic representation and draws on Michael Saward’s framework of the representative claim to reevaluate Bernard Manin’s notion of “audience” democracy as today’s form of representative government. The argument is that, as digital development provides citizens with less demanding modes of political participation and platforms of representative claim-making, it enhances the sphere of opinion formation and the role of non-electoral representation. This sphere entails a tendency towards a re-depersonalization of politics, thus leading towards the transformation of “audience” democracy.","PeriodicalId":44829,"journal":{"name":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","volume":"72 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Affairs-Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2023-0039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to explore the changes that representative democracy is experiencing as a result of the transformation of communication channels. In particular, it focuses on non-electoral representation in the form of movements that emerged throughout the 2010s and that were defined by a strong social media presence (e.g. Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, Yellow Vests). Despite not attempting to gain political power via elections, these movements, through online and offline activities, nonetheless managed to shape the realm of politics. The paper thus analyzes the movements’ inner representative dynamics and the ways they reshape representative democracy. It engages with a critical reading of Hanna Pitkin’s concept of symbolic representation and draws on Michael Saward’s framework of the representative claim to reevaluate Bernard Manin’s notion of “audience” democracy as today’s form of representative government. The argument is that, as digital development provides citizens with less demanding modes of political participation and platforms of representative claim-making, it enhances the sphere of opinion formation and the role of non-electoral representation. This sphere entails a tendency towards a re-depersonalization of politics, thus leading towards the transformation of “audience” democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受众民主2.0:数字时代的再去人格化政治
摘要本文旨在探讨代议制民主由于传播渠道的转变而正在经历的变化。它特别关注2010年代出现的非选举形式的运动,这些运动以强大的社交媒体存在为特征(例如占领华尔街,黑人的命也是命,#MeToo,黄背心)。尽管这些运动没有试图通过选举获得政治权力,但通过线上和线下活动,这些运动仍然成功地塑造了政治领域。因此,本文分析了这些运动的内部代议动态及其重塑代议民主的方式。它对汉纳·皮特金的象征性代表概念进行了批判性解读,并借鉴了迈克尔·萨沃德的代表性主张框架,重新评估了伯纳德·马宁的“受众”民主概念,即今天的代议制政府形式。论点是,由于数字发展为公民提供了要求较低的政治参与模式和代表性主张的平台,它扩大了意见形成的范围和非选举代表的作用。这一领域包含一种政治再去人格化的趋势,从而导致“听众”民主的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age Kasanda, A. and Hrubec, M. (Eds.): Africa in a Multilateral World. Afropolitan Dilemmas. New York, London: Routledge. Routledge Contemporary Africa Series, 2022. Back from the Future. Remarks on Temporality and Totality in the Birth of Classical German Philosophy Philosophy and Jena Romanticism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1