Beyond Dyadic Organization–Public Relationships: Proposing the Devotional-Promotional Relational Engagement Model

IF 4.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Public Relations Research Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1080/1062726x.2023.2261576
Jordan Morehouse
{"title":"Beyond Dyadic Organization–Public Relationships: Proposing the Devotional-Promotional Relational Engagement Model","authors":"Jordan Morehouse","doi":"10.1080/1062726x.2023.2261576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRelationships are complex, multifaceted, and complicated phenomena, both in practice and study. Additionally, while research regarding the ways in which religious organizations practice public relations is growing, this area of public relations scholarship is still in its infancy with a limited understanding regarding the practice of public relations by religious organizations and the outcomes of their efforts. Thus, to contribute to gaps in public relations theorizing on relationship management and engagement, and gaps in the literature on religious organization and stakeholders, this study interviewed 28 megachurch communication employees to assess their relational engagement strategies and goals. Findings reveal that religious organizations encourage the formation of six relationships between five entities through their public relations efforts. This study proposes the Devotional-Promotional Relational Engagement Model as a new model of relational engagement, which highlights the six strategic relationships organizations cultivate.KEYWORDS: Engagementintra-stakeholder relationshipsorganization-public relationshipsrelationship managementreligious organizations AcknowledgementI'd like to acknowledge and thank the Graduate School at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, Thomas Gene Roberts and Jean R. Roberts, and Eli A. and Minnie S. Rubinstein for their generous research awards.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Thus, all previous research on relationships in the public relations literature, including OPR, is applicable to relational engagement. Again, relational engagement is the repositioning of relationships within an engagement framework, as opposed to an entirely new concept or construct.2. To clarify, an intra-congregational relationship can come first and act as an influential force toward a relationship between the congregant and God. However, participants posit that the relationship with God should come first and take priority over other relationships.3. To clarify, salvation is a term that refers to the “saving” of a person from death and eternal separation from God. Becoming “saved,” or converted to Christianity, occurs when a person believes that Jesus Christ, God’s son, took ownership and punishment of their sin, died as a result of that punishment, was resurrected, and now as a result of Jesus’ actions, the individual can spend eternity in Heaven with God and Jesus.4. While megachurches do benefit from their congregants having a strong relationship with God, or strong friendships within the church, the primary benefit of these relationships rests with the stakeholders themselves.","PeriodicalId":47737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Relations Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Relations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2023.2261576","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTRelationships are complex, multifaceted, and complicated phenomena, both in practice and study. Additionally, while research regarding the ways in which religious organizations practice public relations is growing, this area of public relations scholarship is still in its infancy with a limited understanding regarding the practice of public relations by religious organizations and the outcomes of their efforts. Thus, to contribute to gaps in public relations theorizing on relationship management and engagement, and gaps in the literature on religious organization and stakeholders, this study interviewed 28 megachurch communication employees to assess their relational engagement strategies and goals. Findings reveal that religious organizations encourage the formation of six relationships between five entities through their public relations efforts. This study proposes the Devotional-Promotional Relational Engagement Model as a new model of relational engagement, which highlights the six strategic relationships organizations cultivate.KEYWORDS: Engagementintra-stakeholder relationshipsorganization-public relationshipsrelationship managementreligious organizations AcknowledgementI'd like to acknowledge and thank the Graduate School at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, Thomas Gene Roberts and Jean R. Roberts, and Eli A. and Minnie S. Rubinstein for their generous research awards.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Thus, all previous research on relationships in the public relations literature, including OPR, is applicable to relational engagement. Again, relational engagement is the repositioning of relationships within an engagement framework, as opposed to an entirely new concept or construct.2. To clarify, an intra-congregational relationship can come first and act as an influential force toward a relationship between the congregant and God. However, participants posit that the relationship with God should come first and take priority over other relationships.3. To clarify, salvation is a term that refers to the “saving” of a person from death and eternal separation from God. Becoming “saved,” or converted to Christianity, occurs when a person believes that Jesus Christ, God’s son, took ownership and punishment of their sin, died as a result of that punishment, was resurrected, and now as a result of Jesus’ actions, the individual can spend eternity in Heaven with God and Jesus.4. While megachurches do benefit from their congregants having a strong relationship with God, or strong friendships within the church, the primary benefit of these relationships rests with the stakeholders themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越二元组织-公众关系:提出奉献-推广关系参与模型
【摘要】关系在实践和研究中都是复杂的、多面的、复杂的现象。此外,虽然关于宗教组织实践公共关系的方式的研究正在增长,但这一公共关系领域的学术研究仍处于起步阶段,对宗教组织的公共关系实践及其努力的结果的理解有限。因此,为了弥补公共关系理论在关系管理和参与方面的空白,以及在宗教组织和利益相关者方面的文献空白,本研究采访了28名大型教会传播员工,以评估他们的关系参与策略和目标。调查结果显示,宗教组织通过其公共关系努力,鼓励在五个实体之间形成六种关系。本研究提出了一种新的关系投入模型——虔诚-促进型关系投入模型,该模型突出了组织培养的六种战略关系。关键词:参与利益相关者内部关系组织公共关系关系管理宗教组织致谢我要感谢北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校研究生院托马斯·吉恩·罗伯茨和简·r·罗伯茨以及伊莱·a·和米妮·s·鲁宾斯坦慷慨的研究奖。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。因此,以往所有公共关系文献中关于关系的研究,包括OPR在内,都适用于关系投入。同样,关系参与是在参与框架内对关系的重新定位,而不是一个全新的概念或结构。澄清一下,会众内部的关系可以首先出现,并作为影响会众与上帝之间关系的力量。然而,参与者认为与上帝的关系应该是第一位的,优先于其他关系。为了澄清,救恩是一个术语,指的是“拯救”一个人从死亡和永远与上帝分离。当一个人相信神的儿子耶稣基督承担了他们的罪的责任和惩罚,因那惩罚而死,又因耶稣的行为而复活,这个人就可以在天堂与神和耶稣永远在一起,这就是“得救”或皈依基督教。虽然大型教会确实受益于他们的会众与上帝的牢固关系,或者教会内部的牢固友谊,但这些关系的主要好处在于利益相关者自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Organizations with True Heart: The Role of Organizational Identity in Shaping Consumer Attributions of Corporate Responsibility to Race (CRR) Motives Visual Public Relations and User Fantasies on Facebook: The Case of an African Presidential Inauguration During the COVID-19 Pandemic Wrangling in the Marketplace or Bartering in the Bazaar? Adapting Metaphors for Public Relations’ Societal Role Resolved: Exploring the Role of Dialogic Engagement in Shareholder Activism for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Beyond Dyadic Organization–Public Relationships: Proposing the Devotional-Promotional Relational Engagement Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1