Conservative ideas as the source of activity of the Polish White Cross in the United States of America

Elwira Jolanta Kryńska
{"title":"Conservative ideas as the source of activity of the Polish White Cross in the United States of America","authors":"Elwira Jolanta Kryńska","doi":"10.4467/24504564pmp.23.005.18234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to analyze the conservative ideas that are the source of the work of the Polish White Cross in the United States of America. Consideration of this issue is desirable for several reasons. First, today’s resurgent radicalisms are causing the world that we have known for the past quarter of a century to cease to exist right before our eyes. At the same time, the European status quo has been challenged by the war steered by Putin. In this context, a question arises: Does Europe, which is in the process of “change”, still need a conservative voice? To answer this, it is worth recalling not only non-ideological ideas attempting to define the reality of the future, but also practical ones, including those from the early 20th century initiated in the U.S., which played a historical role in the building of Polish statehood, and are now a testimony to joint-Polish-American initiatives that support democratic changes in the world. The reference to these examples is all the more justified because they are based on American conservative thought, which was the source of American human rights policy in the early 20th century. Representatives of the so-called idealist trend (also called Wilsonism), proclaimed that the United States could effectively exercise its function as a world leader if its policies promoted the traditional values of protecting individual rights and freedoms. Of breakthrough importance for the Polish cause was President Thomas Woodrow Wilson’s speech of January 18, 1918, in which, defining America’s war aims, he declared that an independent Polish state must be established as a result of the war. President Wilson also authorized the recruitment of volunteers for the Polish army and their training. Since every national army has its own humanitarian unit called the Red Cross, it was felt that the Polish Army should also have one. Unfortunately, as Poland was non-existent on the map of Europe at the time, it did not participate in the founding deliberations of the international Red Cross association established in 1864 in Switzerland, and therefore did not have the right to establish its own organization under this name. For this reason, Ignacy Jan Paderewski suggested the idea of establishing the Polish White Cross (PBK), which was grounded in conservative ideas. In addition, the tradition of the Polish White Cross is worth discussing because of some opinions that volunteering in Poland was less common than in other Western countries and that Poland has no tradition of it. Meanwhile, the work of White Cross is a spectacular undertaking, unprecedented in the history of Poland, based on the principles of volunteerism, and is comparable to Poland’s current provision of relief action to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian migrants due to Russia’s ruthless invasion. This, therefore, is another reason to recall the work of the White Cross. Unfortunately, despite the fact that almost every soldier in the Second Republic and in the Polish Armed Forces in the West came into contact with the Polish White Cross, the awareness of its existence and commitment to the cause is still limited. This is probably due to the fact that the so-called People’s Polish Army grew out of other ideological aspirations detached from the traditions of the military formations of the interwar period and organizations cooperating with it. The authorities of People’s Poland supported only socio-political associations associated with “real socialism”.","PeriodicalId":350521,"journal":{"name":"Polska Myśl Pedagogiczna","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polska Myśl Pedagogiczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/24504564pmp.23.005.18234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the conservative ideas that are the source of the work of the Polish White Cross in the United States of America. Consideration of this issue is desirable for several reasons. First, today’s resurgent radicalisms are causing the world that we have known for the past quarter of a century to cease to exist right before our eyes. At the same time, the European status quo has been challenged by the war steered by Putin. In this context, a question arises: Does Europe, which is in the process of “change”, still need a conservative voice? To answer this, it is worth recalling not only non-ideological ideas attempting to define the reality of the future, but also practical ones, including those from the early 20th century initiated in the U.S., which played a historical role in the building of Polish statehood, and are now a testimony to joint-Polish-American initiatives that support democratic changes in the world. The reference to these examples is all the more justified because they are based on American conservative thought, which was the source of American human rights policy in the early 20th century. Representatives of the so-called idealist trend (also called Wilsonism), proclaimed that the United States could effectively exercise its function as a world leader if its policies promoted the traditional values of protecting individual rights and freedoms. Of breakthrough importance for the Polish cause was President Thomas Woodrow Wilson’s speech of January 18, 1918, in which, defining America’s war aims, he declared that an independent Polish state must be established as a result of the war. President Wilson also authorized the recruitment of volunteers for the Polish army and their training. Since every national army has its own humanitarian unit called the Red Cross, it was felt that the Polish Army should also have one. Unfortunately, as Poland was non-existent on the map of Europe at the time, it did not participate in the founding deliberations of the international Red Cross association established in 1864 in Switzerland, and therefore did not have the right to establish its own organization under this name. For this reason, Ignacy Jan Paderewski suggested the idea of establishing the Polish White Cross (PBK), which was grounded in conservative ideas. In addition, the tradition of the Polish White Cross is worth discussing because of some opinions that volunteering in Poland was less common than in other Western countries and that Poland has no tradition of it. Meanwhile, the work of White Cross is a spectacular undertaking, unprecedented in the history of Poland, based on the principles of volunteerism, and is comparable to Poland’s current provision of relief action to hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian migrants due to Russia’s ruthless invasion. This, therefore, is another reason to recall the work of the White Cross. Unfortunately, despite the fact that almost every soldier in the Second Republic and in the Polish Armed Forces in the West came into contact with the Polish White Cross, the awareness of its existence and commitment to the cause is still limited. This is probably due to the fact that the so-called People’s Polish Army grew out of other ideological aspirations detached from the traditions of the military formations of the interwar period and organizations cooperating with it. The authorities of People’s Poland supported only socio-political associations associated with “real socialism”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保守思想是波兰白十字会在美国活动的源泉
本文的目的是分析作为波兰白十字会在美国工作来源的保守思想。考虑这个问题是可取的,原因有几个。首先,今天死灰复燃的激进主义正在使我们在过去25年里所熟悉的世界在我们眼前消失。与此同时,欧洲的现状受到了普京主导的战争的挑战。在这种背景下,一个问题出现了:处于“变革”过程中的欧洲是否还需要一个保守的声音?为了回答这个问题,我们不仅要回顾那些试图定义未来现实的非意识形态思想,而且要回顾那些实际的思想,包括20世纪初在美国发起的那些思想,它们在波兰建国的建设中发挥了历史作用,现在是波兰和美国共同倡议支持世界民主变革的见证。这些例子是基于20世纪初美国人权政策的根源——美国的保守主义思想,因此引用这些例子就更加合理了。所谓理想主义思潮(也称为威尔逊主义)的代表宣称,如果美国的政策促进保护个人权利和自由的传统价值观,美国就能有效地行使其作为世界领袖的职能。对波兰事业具有突破性意义的是托马斯·伍德罗·威尔逊总统1918年1月18日的讲话,他在讲话中明确了美国的战争目标,宣布战争结束后必须建立一个独立的波兰国家。威尔逊总统还授权为波兰军队招募志愿者并对他们进行训练。由于每个国家的军队都有自己的人道主义单位,称为红十字会,因此人们认为波兰军队也应该有一个。不幸的是,由于波兰当时在欧洲地图上不存在,它没有参加1864年在瑞士成立的国际红十字会的创始审议,因此无权以这个名称建立自己的组织。因此,伊格纳齐·扬·帕德列夫斯基提出了建立以保守思想为基础的波兰白十字会(PBK)的想法。此外,波兰白十字的传统值得讨论,因为一些人认为波兰的志愿活动比其他西方国家少,波兰没有志愿活动的传统。与此同时,白十字的工作是一项壮观的事业,在波兰历史上是前所未有的,基于志愿服务的原则,可与波兰目前为数十万乌克兰移民提供的救济行动相媲美,这些移民是由于俄罗斯的无情入侵。因此,这是回顾白十字会工作的另一个理由。不幸的是,尽管第二共和国和在西方的波兰武装部队的几乎每一个士兵都接触过波兰白十字,但对它的存在和对这一事业的承诺的认识仍然有限。这可能是由于所谓的波兰人民军队产生于其他意识形态的愿望,脱离了两次世界大战期间的军事编队和与之合作的组织的传统。波兰人民当局只支持与“真正的社会主义”有关的社会政治协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
O prawa obywatelskie dla kobiet (fragmenty) Pedagogika konserwatywna: Korzenie – Tożsamość – Misja (wybrane wątki) Family determinants of social maladjustment and juvenile delinquency according to Natalia Han-Ilgiewicz O potrzebie badań empirycznych w pedagogice: kilka refleksji i postulatów teoretyczno-metodologicznych Hanna Wentlandtowa (1906‒1994) ‒ woman-soldier, promoter of education, precursor of health education and health promotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1