What is important for you makes you think about the pandemic differently: moral foundations, pandemic-related fears and convictions (Lo que cada uno consideramos importante nos hace reflexionar sobre la pandemia de forma distinta: fundamentos morales, temores y convicciones sobre la pandemia)

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Estudios De Psicologia Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1080/02109395.2023.2207300
Iwona Nowakowska, Anna Zarazińska
{"title":"What is important for you makes you think about the pandemic differently: moral foundations, pandemic-related fears and convictions (<i>Lo que cada uno consideramos importante nos hace reflexionar sobre la pandemia de forma distinta: fundamentos morales, temores y convicciones sobre la pandemia</i>)","authors":"Iwona Nowakowska, Anna Zarazińska","doi":"10.1080/02109395.2023.2207300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on the Moral Foundations Theory and findings regarding the linkage of values, convictions and beliefs, the aim of the study was to compare people displaying various constellations of moral foundations regarding their tolerance of ambiguity, fear of COVID-19 (FCV), endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and the extent to which they believed in the effectiveness of five COVID-19 preventive measures. This study was self-report- and questionnaire-based (N = 212), performed on the general public (aged from 18 to 65). Moral foundations clustered into four groups: Individualizing, Binding, Anti-Individualizing and Generally Moral. The endorsement of Individualizing values (Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity) was linked to higher FCV and higher rating of the effectiveness of COVID-19 preventive measures. Endorsing Binding values (Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect and Purity/Sanctity) was related to lower tolerance of ambiguity and displaying higher conspiracy beliefs. Findings are discussed in the light of their meaning of values for socially responsible behaviour during a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":55642,"journal":{"name":"Estudios De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2023.2207300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on the Moral Foundations Theory and findings regarding the linkage of values, convictions and beliefs, the aim of the study was to compare people displaying various constellations of moral foundations regarding their tolerance of ambiguity, fear of COVID-19 (FCV), endorsement of COVID-19 conspiracy theories and the extent to which they believed in the effectiveness of five COVID-19 preventive measures. This study was self-report- and questionnaire-based (N = 212), performed on the general public (aged from 18 to 65). Moral foundations clustered into four groups: Individualizing, Binding, Anti-Individualizing and Generally Moral. The endorsement of Individualizing values (Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity) was linked to higher FCV and higher rating of the effectiveness of COVID-19 preventive measures. Endorsing Binding values (Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect and Purity/Sanctity) was related to lower tolerance of ambiguity and displaying higher conspiracy beliefs. Findings are discussed in the light of their meaning of values for socially responsible behaviour during a pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对你来说重要的东西使你以不同的方式看待大流行:道德基础,与大流行有关的恐惧和信念(Lo que cada uno认为重要的人有反思性的sobre la pandemia de forma区别:fundamental morales, temores y conviction sobre la pandemia)
基于道德基础理论和关于价值观、信念和信仰联系的研究结果,该研究的目的是比较具有不同道德基础的人们对模棱两可的容忍度、对COVID-19的恐惧(FCV)、对COVID-19阴谋论的认可以及他们相信五种COVID-19预防措施有效性的程度。本研究以自我报告和问卷为基础(N = 212),在18至65岁的普通公众中进行。道德基础分为四类:个体化、约束性、反个体化和一般道德。个性化价值观(伤害/护理、公平/互惠)的认可与更高的FCV和更高的COVID-19预防措施有效性评级有关。认可约束性价值观(群体/忠诚、权威/尊重和纯洁/神圣)与较低的歧义容忍度和较高的阴谋信念有关。根据调查结果在大流行期间对社会负责的行为的价值意义对其进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios De Psicologia
Estudios De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Mediation of emotional intelligence in resilient coping and depression in adverse conditions: study in home confinement of the COVID-19 health crisis ( Mediación de la inteligencia emocional en el afrontamiento resiliente y la depresión en condiciones adversas: estudio en confinamiento domiciliario durante la emergencia sanitaria COVID-19 ) Employment status among individuals afflicted by acquired brain injury: exploring economic consequences for both the affected person and their family ( Situación laboral en personas con lesión cerebral adquirida: estudio sobre el impacto económico individual y familiar ) Modulation of executive functioning by social stress: a behavioural study ( Modulación del funcionamiento ejecutivo por estrés social: un estudio conductual ) Heavy study investment in Spanish college students: psychometric properties of the studyholism inventories (SI-10 and SI-15) ( Alta inversión en el estudio en estudiantes universitarios españoles: propiedades psicométricas de los inventarios de obsesión por el estudio — SI-10 y SI-15 ) Do artificial neural networks dream of understanding sentence comprehension? A preliminary study ( ¿Sueñan las redes neuronales artificiales con entender la comprensión de frases? Un estudio preliminar )
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1