Humor in the Gricean Maxim Non-observance of Animated Sitcom Show “Family Guy”

Anak Agung Ngurah Kenata Janamejaya, Ni Wayan Sukarini, Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha
{"title":"Humor in the Gricean Maxim Non-observance of Animated Sitcom Show “Family Guy”","authors":"Anak Agung Ngurah Kenata Janamejaya, Ni Wayan Sukarini, Ni Luh Sutjiati Beratha","doi":"10.24843/ling.2023.v30.i02.p02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aimed to find out how the non-observance of Gricean maxims was affecting the humor of the sitcom “Family Guy”. This article used a qualitative method where the data was taken from animated sitcom show “Family Guy” in a form of question-and-answer adjacency pair. This article used the observation method in collecting the data. Furthermore, the data was analyzed using content analysis method based on Grice’s cooperative principle theory which focused more on the maxim non-observance aspect. From the data collection, it showed that there were 33 maxim non-observance found, containing 19 violations of maxim, 10 flouts of maxim, 3 maxims opt out, and 1 clash of maxim. Based on the analysis, it was revealed that violation of maxim was the most used maxim non-observance due to how easy it was to create humorous situation when ones have the intention to disobey the maxim. On the other hand, the occurrences of the flout of maxim were on the second most occurred maxim non observance. The last two were opt out and clash which were not suitable when both were used for the humor aspect.","PeriodicalId":55839,"journal":{"name":"Linguistika","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ling.2023.v30.i02.p02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aimed to find out how the non-observance of Gricean maxims was affecting the humor of the sitcom “Family Guy”. This article used a qualitative method where the data was taken from animated sitcom show “Family Guy” in a form of question-and-answer adjacency pair. This article used the observation method in collecting the data. Furthermore, the data was analyzed using content analysis method based on Grice’s cooperative principle theory which focused more on the maxim non-observance aspect. From the data collection, it showed that there were 33 maxim non-observance found, containing 19 violations of maxim, 10 flouts of maxim, 3 maxims opt out, and 1 clash of maxim. Based on the analysis, it was revealed that violation of maxim was the most used maxim non-observance due to how easy it was to create humorous situation when ones have the intention to disobey the maxim. On the other hand, the occurrences of the flout of maxim were on the second most occurred maxim non observance. The last two were opt out and clash which were not suitable when both were used for the humor aspect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情景喜剧《恶搞之家》中的幽默
本文旨在找出不遵守Gricean格言是如何影响情景喜剧“恶搞之家”的幽默的。本文采用定性的方法,以问答邻接对的形式,从动画情景喜剧《恶搞之家》中抽取数据。本文采用观察法收集数据。此外,采用基于Grice合作原则理论的内容分析方法对数据进行分析,该方法更侧重于不遵守准则方面。从收集的数据来看,共发现33条不遵守准则,其中违反准则19条,藐视准则10条,退出准则3条,冲突准则1条。在分析的基础上,发现违背格言是使用最多的格言不遵守,因为当人们有违背格言的意图时,很容易制造出幽默的情景。另一方面,违反准则的情况在不遵守准则的情况中排名第二。最后两个是选择退出和冲突,这是不适合的,当两者都用于幽默方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Use of Crosswords as Reading Comprehension Assessment Language Style Used by Characters in Moxie Movie An Analysis of Derivational Suffixes Used in @Wetheurban Instagram Posts A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Japanese Classifiers Verbal and Visual Sign in “Encanto” Movie Posters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1