Hunting for talent: Firm‐driven labor market search in the United States

IF 6.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Strategic Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1002/smj.3559
Ines Black, Sharique Hasan, Rembrand Koning
{"title":"Hunting for talent: Firm‐driven labor market search in the United States","authors":"Ines Black, Sharique Hasan, Rembrand Koning","doi":"10.1002/smj.3559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research Summary We analyze firm‐driven labor market search, where firms “hunt” for talent rather than rely on workers to apply for vacancies. We leverage three approaches. We develop a model of firm‐driven search and derive equilibrium conditions under which firms use this channel. We test our model's predictions using two data sources. Data from a nationally representative survey of 10,000 workers shows that the percentage hired through recruiting has increased from 4.9% in 1991 to 14.3% in 2022. This share is larger for higher‐skilled workers and those with online profiles on LinkedIn. We complement this analysis with data on the near universe of online job postings from 2010 through 2020. Consistent with our model and worker survey evidence, we find firms that demand higher‐skilled workers or operate in labor markets with heavy LinkedIn use are more likely to “hunt for talent.” Managerial Summary We study the phenomenon of “hunting” for talent, where firms fill open positions by searching for workers and inviting them to a recruiting process, rather than relying on workers to apply directly. We find that the percentage of workers hired through hunting has increased from 4.9% in 1991 to 14.3% in 2022. We propose that firms that rely more on high‐skilled workers and/or operate within industries with a higher share of available candidates with online profiles are more likely to hunt for their talent. We find support for this conjecture using two data sets, documenting the worker and firm side of the labor market. Data from a nationally representative survey of 10,000 workers shows they are more likely to have been “hunted” by their employer if they work in an occupation that requires more skills, or if their industry has more candidates with online profiles. Moreover, data on US‐wide job postings over the past decade shows that firms in need of highly skilled workers are more likely to invest in outbound recruiting capabilities.","PeriodicalId":22023,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3559","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary We analyze firm‐driven labor market search, where firms “hunt” for talent rather than rely on workers to apply for vacancies. We leverage three approaches. We develop a model of firm‐driven search and derive equilibrium conditions under which firms use this channel. We test our model's predictions using two data sources. Data from a nationally representative survey of 10,000 workers shows that the percentage hired through recruiting has increased from 4.9% in 1991 to 14.3% in 2022. This share is larger for higher‐skilled workers and those with online profiles on LinkedIn. We complement this analysis with data on the near universe of online job postings from 2010 through 2020. Consistent with our model and worker survey evidence, we find firms that demand higher‐skilled workers or operate in labor markets with heavy LinkedIn use are more likely to “hunt for talent.” Managerial Summary We study the phenomenon of “hunting” for talent, where firms fill open positions by searching for workers and inviting them to a recruiting process, rather than relying on workers to apply directly. We find that the percentage of workers hired through hunting has increased from 4.9% in 1991 to 14.3% in 2022. We propose that firms that rely more on high‐skilled workers and/or operate within industries with a higher share of available candidates with online profiles are more likely to hunt for their talent. We find support for this conjecture using two data sets, documenting the worker and firm side of the labor market. Data from a nationally representative survey of 10,000 workers shows they are more likely to have been “hunted” by their employer if they work in an occupation that requires more skills, or if their industry has more candidates with online profiles. Moreover, data on US‐wide job postings over the past decade shows that firms in need of highly skilled workers are more likely to invest in outbound recruiting capabilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找人才:美国公司驱动的劳动力市场搜索
摘要研究总结我们分析了企业驱动的劳动力市场搜索,即企业“寻找”人才,而不是依靠工人申请职位空缺。我们利用了三种方法。我们开发了一个企业驱动搜索的模型,并推导出企业使用该渠道的均衡条件。我们使用两个数据源来测试我们模型的预测。一项对1万名工人进行的具有全国代表性的调查数据显示,通过招聘聘用的比例从1991年的4.9%上升到2022年的14.3%。对于高技能员工和在LinkedIn上有个人资料的员工来说,这一比例更大。我们用2010年到2020年的在线招聘信息的数据来补充这一分析。与我们的模型和员工调查证据一致,我们发现需要高技能员工或在大量使用领英的劳动力市场运营的公司更有可能“寻找人才”。我们研究了“寻找”人才的现象,即公司通过寻找员工并邀请他们参加招聘过程来填补空缺职位,而不是依靠员工直接申请。我们发现,通过狩猎雇佣的工人比例从1991年的4.9%上升到2022年的14.3%。我们建议,那些更依赖高技能工人和/或在拥有更高比例在线简历的可用候选人的行业中运营的公司更有可能寻找他们的人才。我们发现支持这一猜想使用两个数据集,记录工人和企业方面的劳动力市场。一项对全国1万名员工进行的具有代表性的调查数据显示,如果他们从事的职业对技能要求更高,或者他们所在行业有更多在线简历的求职者,他们更有可能被雇主“猎杀”。此外,美国过去十年的招聘数据显示,需要高技能工人的公司更有可能投资于海外招聘能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.40%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: At the Strategic Management Journal, we are committed to publishing top-tier research that addresses key questions in the field of strategic management and captivates scholars in this area. Our publication welcomes manuscripts covering a wide range of topics, perspectives, and research methodologies. As a result, our editorial decisions truly embrace the diversity inherent in the field.
期刊最新文献
More is (sometimes) merrier: Heterogeneity in demand spillovers and competition on a digital platform How do US firms grow? New evidence from a growth decomposition Strategic restraint: When do human‐capital‐intensive companies choose (not) to use noncompete agreements? Organizational adaptation in dynamic environments: Disentangling the effects of how much to explore versus where to explore Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1