Efficient Measurement of Global Human Identification and Citizenship – Is One Item Sufficient?

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000801
Philipp Geisen, Friedemann Trutzenberg, Michael Eid
{"title":"Efficient Measurement of Global Human Identification and Citizenship – Is One Item Sufficient?","authors":"Philipp Geisen, Friedemann Trutzenberg, Michael Eid","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: To address the complexity of global challenges (e.g., migration, climate change), research must examine many constructs and their interrelationships. Therefore, efficient assessment methods (e.g., short scales) are required, especially when constructing large-scale social surveys. A widely used instrument for assessing global identification as an important predictor of behavior related to coping with global challenges is the Identification With All Humanity (IWAH) scale ( McFarland et al., 2012 ). With the present study, we aimed to investigate whether this scale can be sufficiently represented by a single item. Using bifactor-(S*I − 1) models, we analyzed whether one item from the scale itself (Item 5) and a related single-item measure from the World Values Survey (WVS; Inglehart et al., 2018 ) could adequately represent a German version of the IWAH scale. The sample ( n = 1,369) was representative of the German population regarding age, gender, income, education, and region of residence. Item 5 showed an appropriate single-item reliability (.82) and represented 64–93% of the true variance in the individual IWAH items, whereas the WVS item (Rel( Y WVS ) = .61) represented 52–81%. To reflect the multidimensionality of the IWAH, a 4-item short scale is recommended.","PeriodicalId":48018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"1988 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: To address the complexity of global challenges (e.g., migration, climate change), research must examine many constructs and their interrelationships. Therefore, efficient assessment methods (e.g., short scales) are required, especially when constructing large-scale social surveys. A widely used instrument for assessing global identification as an important predictor of behavior related to coping with global challenges is the Identification With All Humanity (IWAH) scale ( McFarland et al., 2012 ). With the present study, we aimed to investigate whether this scale can be sufficiently represented by a single item. Using bifactor-(S*I − 1) models, we analyzed whether one item from the scale itself (Item 5) and a related single-item measure from the World Values Survey (WVS; Inglehart et al., 2018 ) could adequately represent a German version of the IWAH scale. The sample ( n = 1,369) was representative of the German population regarding age, gender, income, education, and region of residence. Item 5 showed an appropriate single-item reliability (.82) and represented 64–93% of the true variance in the individual IWAH items, whereas the WVS item (Rel( Y WVS ) = .61) represented 52–81%. To reflect the multidimensionality of the IWAH, a 4-item short scale is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球人类身份和公民身份的有效衡量——一个项目足够吗?
摘要:为了解决全球挑战的复杂性(如移民、气候变化),研究必须考察许多结构及其相互关系。因此,需要有效的评估方法(如短量表),特别是在构建大规模社会调查时。作为应对全球挑战相关行为的重要预测因素,广泛使用的评估全球认同的工具是全人类认同(IWAH)量表(McFarland et al., 2012)。在本研究中,我们的目的是调查这个量表是否可以充分地代表一个单一的项目。使用双因子-(S*I−1)模型,我们分析了来自量表本身的一个项目(项目5)和来自世界价值观调查(WVS;Inglehart等人,2018)可以充分代表德国版的IWAH量表。样本(n = 1369)在年龄、性别、收入、教育程度和居住地区方面代表了德国人口。项目5显示出适当的单项信度(.82),代表了IWAH单项真实方差的64-93%,而WVS项目(Rel(Y WVS) = .61)代表了52-81%。为了反映IWAH的多维度,建议使用4项短量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The main purpose of the EJPA is to present important articles which provide seminal information on both theoretical and applied developments in this field. Articles reporting the construction of new measures or an advancement of an existing measure are given priority. The journal is directed to practitioners as well as to academicians: The conviction of its editors is that the discipline of psychological assessment should, necessarily and firmly, be attached to the roots of psychological science, while going deeply into all the consequences of its applied, practice-oriented development.
期刊最新文献
The Potential of Machine Learning Methods in Psychological Assessment and Test Construction An Examination of the Role of Inverted Dark Tetrad Items on Structural Properties and Construct Validity Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Romanian Version of Thriving at Work Scale Development and Validation of the Work Orientation Questionnaire Short-Form (WOQ-SF) Seeing the Light in Self-Reported Glare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1