Invisibility

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2979/jfs.2023.a908310
Grace Ji-Sun Kim
{"title":"Invisibility","authors":"Grace Ji-Sun Kim","doi":"10.2979/jfs.2023.a908310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Invisibility Grace Ji-Sun Kim (bio) The history of racism and prejudice against Asian Americans shows the long record of suffering and oppression of Asian immigrants. In the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, discrimination, racism, and xenophobia marked Asian immigrants as undesirable and un-American. White America precisely defines who and what is American, which denotes privileged selectivity in choosing who can immigrate and become naturalized according to what they feel is acceptable. When the Chinese Exclusion Act expired, it was extended by the Geary Act of 1892, which barred the Chinese from entering the United States. The Geary Act ended in 1943. During World War II, Japanese Americans lost everything they possessed and were forced into internment camps as they became national threats to white Americans. Anti-Asian racism has been part of the fabric of the American story. Race and the American cultural perception of one's race have been the determining factors in distinguishing between the \"good\" immigrants and the \"bad\" ones, the better assimilable ones from the unassimilable ones, the racialized ones, and the neutral ones. Immigrants deemed worthy of American citizenship were naturalized; those who were not were excluded. The McCarran-Walter Act (1952) abolished the racial restrictions put in place by the Naturalization Act of 1790, which limited naturalization to \"free white persons.\" This meant women, nonwhite persons, and indentured servants (who were mostly Asian Americans) could not become naturalized citizens. Over time, access to citizenship became more expansive, but the racial restrictions were not eliminated entirely until 1952. This produced the category of \"aliens\" who were ineligible for citizenship, which largely affected Asian immigrants and limited their rights, as noncitizens, to property ownership, representation in courts, public employment, and voting. Thus, many generations of Asian Americans were made invisible. Without citizenship, they were pushed to the margins, and they did not have the rights to challenge their marginality and invisibility in the courts. [End Page 111] Xenophobia is a defining feature of American life. Xenophobia emerged as soon as nonwhites immigrated to America, and it triumphed in the 1920s. The 1924 Johnson-Reed Act was a strict policy of ethnic quotas that nearly closed the door on immigration from Asia for over forty years. When mainstream, explicit forms of xenophobia began to wane during the civil rights movement, it merely bubbled away from the surface, still lurking, only to reemerge in the last half century—namely, during the Trump administration. Xenophobia has continued the legacy of discriminatory immigration policies, as reflected in the Muslim ban (2017) introduced by President Trump that banned foreigners from seven predominantly Muslim countries from visiting the United States for ninety days. Xenophobia continues to marginalize immigrants and people of color who have been in America for centuries. Asian Americans are pushed into an ambiguous space wherein their supposed political meekness and social reserve prohibit others from viewing them as cultural leaders. They are not represented in positions of power or seen making visible change, in part because American society does not believe in them doing so. Through ambitious activism and diverse dialogues, Asian Americans must redefine their cultural past, which has rendered their discrimination invisible and unimportant in the American story. In this racially ambiguous space and probationary national identity, Asian Americans have remained silent and apathetically endured small injustices as part of their daily existence. In recent decades, American culture has shifted from being fearfully hateful of Asians to lauding them, proclaiming the \"rise of Asian Americans\" to be the exemplar for all other immigrants and ethnic minorities. This narrative is due to the model-minority myth and honorary white status, which is false and only pits Asian Americans against other people of color to create tension and animosity. Furthermore, these myths erase the long history of discrimination, racism, xenophobia, and indentured work that Asian Americans have experienced from the beginning of their immigration. As a result, their suffering and difficulties are made invisible, which results in racism being discussed in \"Black and white\" terms. Invisibility becomes a common experience among Asian Americans and especially Asian American women, who are doubly made invisible—by not only the white culture but also the Asian subculture that...","PeriodicalId":44347,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST STUDIES IN RELIGION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Invisibility Grace Ji-Sun Kim (bio) The history of racism and prejudice against Asian Americans shows the long record of suffering and oppression of Asian immigrants. In the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, discrimination, racism, and xenophobia marked Asian immigrants as undesirable and un-American. White America precisely defines who and what is American, which denotes privileged selectivity in choosing who can immigrate and become naturalized according to what they feel is acceptable. When the Chinese Exclusion Act expired, it was extended by the Geary Act of 1892, which barred the Chinese from entering the United States. The Geary Act ended in 1943. During World War II, Japanese Americans lost everything they possessed and were forced into internment camps as they became national threats to white Americans. Anti-Asian racism has been part of the fabric of the American story. Race and the American cultural perception of one's race have been the determining factors in distinguishing between the "good" immigrants and the "bad" ones, the better assimilable ones from the unassimilable ones, the racialized ones, and the neutral ones. Immigrants deemed worthy of American citizenship were naturalized; those who were not were excluded. The McCarran-Walter Act (1952) abolished the racial restrictions put in place by the Naturalization Act of 1790, which limited naturalization to "free white persons." This meant women, nonwhite persons, and indentured servants (who were mostly Asian Americans) could not become naturalized citizens. Over time, access to citizenship became more expansive, but the racial restrictions were not eliminated entirely until 1952. This produced the category of "aliens" who were ineligible for citizenship, which largely affected Asian immigrants and limited their rights, as noncitizens, to property ownership, representation in courts, public employment, and voting. Thus, many generations of Asian Americans were made invisible. Without citizenship, they were pushed to the margins, and they did not have the rights to challenge their marginality and invisibility in the courts. [End Page 111] Xenophobia is a defining feature of American life. Xenophobia emerged as soon as nonwhites immigrated to America, and it triumphed in the 1920s. The 1924 Johnson-Reed Act was a strict policy of ethnic quotas that nearly closed the door on immigration from Asia for over forty years. When mainstream, explicit forms of xenophobia began to wane during the civil rights movement, it merely bubbled away from the surface, still lurking, only to reemerge in the last half century—namely, during the Trump administration. Xenophobia has continued the legacy of discriminatory immigration policies, as reflected in the Muslim ban (2017) introduced by President Trump that banned foreigners from seven predominantly Muslim countries from visiting the United States for ninety days. Xenophobia continues to marginalize immigrants and people of color who have been in America for centuries. Asian Americans are pushed into an ambiguous space wherein their supposed political meekness and social reserve prohibit others from viewing them as cultural leaders. They are not represented in positions of power or seen making visible change, in part because American society does not believe in them doing so. Through ambitious activism and diverse dialogues, Asian Americans must redefine their cultural past, which has rendered their discrimination invisible and unimportant in the American story. In this racially ambiguous space and probationary national identity, Asian Americans have remained silent and apathetically endured small injustices as part of their daily existence. In recent decades, American culture has shifted from being fearfully hateful of Asians to lauding them, proclaiming the "rise of Asian Americans" to be the exemplar for all other immigrants and ethnic minorities. This narrative is due to the model-minority myth and honorary white status, which is false and only pits Asian Americans against other people of color to create tension and animosity. Furthermore, these myths erase the long history of discrimination, racism, xenophobia, and indentured work that Asian Americans have experienced from the beginning of their immigration. As a result, their suffering and difficulties are made invisible, which results in racism being discussed in "Black and white" terms. Invisibility becomes a common experience among Asian Americans and especially Asian American women, who are doubly made invisible—by not only the white culture but also the Asian subculture that...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐身
Grace Ji-Sun Kim(传记):对亚裔美国人的种族主义和偏见的历史展示了亚裔移民长期遭受的苦难和压迫。在19世纪和20世纪初,歧视、种族主义和仇外心理标志着亚洲移民不受欢迎和非美国人。美国白人精确地定义了谁是美国人,什么是美国人,这意味着根据他们认为可以接受的方式选择谁可以移民和入籍。《排华法案》到期后,被1892年的《加里法案》延长,该法案禁止中国人进入美国。Geary法案于1943年结束。在第二次世界大战期间,日裔美国人失去了他们所拥有的一切,并被迫进入拘留营,因为他们成为美国白人的国家威胁。反亚裔种族主义一直是美国历史的一部分。种族和美国文化对一个人种族的看法一直是区分“好”移民和“坏”移民、比较容易被同化的移民和不容易被同化的移民、种族化的移民和中性移民的决定性因素。被认为有资格成为美国公民的移民被归化;那些没有被排除在外的人。《麦卡伦-沃尔特法案》(1952年)废除了1790年《入籍法案》(Naturalization Act)中规定的只有“自由白人”才能入籍的种族限制。这意味着妇女、非白人和契约仆人(大多是亚裔美国人)不能成为入籍公民。随着时间的推移,获得公民身份的机会越来越多,但种族限制直到1952年才完全取消。这就产生了没有资格获得公民身份的“外国人”类别,这在很大程度上影响了亚洲移民,并限制了他们作为非公民的权利,包括财产所有权、在法庭上的代表权、公共就业和投票权。因此,许多代亚裔美国人都被忽视了。没有公民身份,他们被推到了边缘,他们没有权利在法庭上挑战自己的边缘地位和隐形地位。仇外心理是美国生活的一个显著特征。当非白人移民到美国时,仇外情绪就出现了,并在20世纪20年代大获全胜。1924年的《约翰逊-里德法案》是一项严格的种族配额政策,在40多年的时间里,它几乎关闭了亚洲移民的大门。当主流的、明确形式的仇外心理在民权运动期间开始减弱时,它只是从表面冒出来,仍然潜伏着,直到过去半个世纪——也就是特朗普政府期间——才重新出现。仇外心理延续了歧视性移民政策的遗产,正如特朗普总统在2017年推出的穆斯林禁令所反映的那样,该禁令禁止来自七个主要穆斯林国家的外国人在90天内访问美国。仇外心理继续使在美国生活了几个世纪的移民和有色人种边缘化。亚裔美国人被推入了一个模棱两可的空间,在这个空间里,他们所谓的政治上的温顺和社会上的缄默,使其他人无法将他们视为文化领袖。他们在权力位置上没有代表,也没有看到他们做出明显的改变,部分原因是美国社会不相信他们会这样做。通过雄心勃勃的行动主义和多样化的对话,亚裔美国人必须重新定义他们的文化历史,这使得他们的歧视在美国故事中变得不可见和不重要。在这个种族模糊的空间和暂时的国家身份中,亚裔美国人保持沉默,冷漠地忍受着日常生活中的小不公正。近几十年来,美国文化已经从对亚洲人的可怕仇恨转变为对他们的赞美,宣称“亚裔美国人的崛起”是所有其他移民和少数族裔的榜样。这种说法是由于模范少数族裔的神话和白人的荣誉地位,这是错误的,只会让亚裔美国人与其他有色人种对立,制造紧张和仇恨。此外,这些神话抹去了亚裔美国人从移民之初就经历的歧视、种族主义、仇外心理和契约劳动的悠久历史。结果,他们的痛苦和困难被忽视了,这导致种族主义被用“黑与白”的术语来讨论。被忽视成为亚裔美国人,尤其是亚裔美国女性的一种普遍经历,她们被双重忽视——不仅是白人文化,还有亚洲亚文化……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, the oldest interdisciplinary, inter-religious feminist academic journal in religious studies, is a channel for the publication of feminist scholarship in religion and a forum for discussion and dialogue among women and men of differing feminist perspectives. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
期刊最新文献
Gender-Based Research in Qur'anic Studies: Concluding Remarks Decolonizing the Body, Pedagogies, and Anti-Asian Hate Extra-Qurʾanic Sources and Gender-Just Hermeneutics Moving from Male-Centric Fallacies to Feminist Interpretive Authority Raising the Moral Bar: Reaching for the Beauty and Goodness of Iḥsān
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1