{"title":"The Decline of the Self: <i>Est</i> and the Critique of Therapeutic Culture","authors":"Michael C. Fisher","doi":"10.5325/gestaltreview.27.2.0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Building on Fisher’s 2020 publication “Tearing Down the Self, or Transforming It? Est as Uncertain Gestalt,” this article tracks the emergence of a full-fledged critique of therapeutic culture, emanating from both American journalists and academic social critics in the mid-1970s. Since Erhard Seminars Training (est) and its founder, Werner Erhard, continued to attract media attention, it was often a focal point in this critique. While it drew on earlier criticisms of the human potential movement (HPM) that had centered on Frederick (Fritz) Perls, Esalen, and Gestalt therapy during the 1960s (detailed in Fisher’s 2017 “Gestalt Pathways of Dissemination, Part III: The Media Firestorm”), the 1970s critique of therapeutic culture branched into a wider mode of attack against both the founders and their legacies. Central to this critique was the concept of narcissism, which wedged itself in the pages of popular magazines and highbrow academic journals alike by 1976. In tracing this history, we see the roots of an ongoing cultural debate about the meaning and value of therapy, as well as the connections between individual pursuits of growth and the social conditions that frame them.","PeriodicalId":499147,"journal":{"name":"Gestalt review","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestalt review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.27.2.0130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Building on Fisher’s 2020 publication “Tearing Down the Self, or Transforming It? Est as Uncertain Gestalt,” this article tracks the emergence of a full-fledged critique of therapeutic culture, emanating from both American journalists and academic social critics in the mid-1970s. Since Erhard Seminars Training (est) and its founder, Werner Erhard, continued to attract media attention, it was often a focal point in this critique. While it drew on earlier criticisms of the human potential movement (HPM) that had centered on Frederick (Fritz) Perls, Esalen, and Gestalt therapy during the 1960s (detailed in Fisher’s 2017 “Gestalt Pathways of Dissemination, Part III: The Media Firestorm”), the 1970s critique of therapeutic culture branched into a wider mode of attack against both the founders and their legacies. Central to this critique was the concept of narcissism, which wedged itself in the pages of popular magazines and highbrow academic journals alike by 1976. In tracing this history, we see the roots of an ongoing cultural debate about the meaning and value of therapy, as well as the connections between individual pursuits of growth and the social conditions that frame them.
基于费舍尔2020年出版的《拆毁自我,还是改造自我?》“不确定的格式塔”,这篇文章追踪了20世纪70年代中期美国记者和学术社会评论家对治疗文化的全面批评的出现。由于Erhard Seminars Training (est)及其创始人Werner Erhard一直吸引着媒体的关注,因此它经常成为这种批评的焦点。虽然它借鉴了20世纪60年代对人类潜能运动(HPM)的早期批评,这些批评集中在弗雷德里克(弗里茨)珀尔斯、埃萨伦和格式塔疗法上(详见费舍尔2017年的《格式塔传播途径,第三部分:媒体风暴》),但20世纪70年代对治疗文化的批评扩展到了对创始人及其遗产的更广泛的攻击模式。这种批评的核心是自恋的概念,到1976年,这个概念在流行杂志和学术期刊上都占据了一席之地。在追溯这段历史的过程中,我们看到了一场关于治疗的意义和价值的持续文化辩论的根源,以及个人对成长的追求与构成它们的社会条件之间的联系。