Can hubs of the human connectome be identified consistently with diffusion MRI?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Network Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1162/netn_a_00324
Mehul Gajwani, Stuart J. Oldham, James C. Pang, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Jeggan Tiego, Mark A. Bellgrove, Alex Fornito
{"title":"Can hubs of the human connectome be identified consistently with diffusion MRI?","authors":"Mehul Gajwani, Stuart J. Oldham, James C. Pang, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, Jeggan Tiego, Mark A. Bellgrove, Alex Fornito","doi":"10.1162/netn_a_00324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recent years have seen a surge in the use of diffusion MRI to map connectomes in humans, paralleled by a similar increase in processing and analysis choices. Yet these different steps and their effects are rarely compared systematically. Here, in a healthy young adult population (n = 294), we characterized the impact of a range of analysis pipelines on one widely studied property of the human connectome: its degree distribution. We evaluated the effects of 40 pipelines (comparing common choices of parcellation, streamline seeding, tractography algorithm, and streamline propagation constraint) and 44 group-representative connectome reconstruction schemes on highly connected hub regions. We found that hub location is highly variable between pipelines. The choice of parcellation has a major influence on hub architecture, and hub connectivity is highly correlated with regional surface area in most of the assessed pipelines (ρ > 0.70 in 69% of the pipelines), particularly when using weighted networks. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for prudent decision-making when processing diffusion MRI data, and for carefully considering how different processing choices can influence connectome organization.","PeriodicalId":48520,"journal":{"name":"Network Neuroscience","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Network Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Recent years have seen a surge in the use of diffusion MRI to map connectomes in humans, paralleled by a similar increase in processing and analysis choices. Yet these different steps and their effects are rarely compared systematically. Here, in a healthy young adult population (n = 294), we characterized the impact of a range of analysis pipelines on one widely studied property of the human connectome: its degree distribution. We evaluated the effects of 40 pipelines (comparing common choices of parcellation, streamline seeding, tractography algorithm, and streamline propagation constraint) and 44 group-representative connectome reconstruction schemes on highly connected hub regions. We found that hub location is highly variable between pipelines. The choice of parcellation has a major influence on hub architecture, and hub connectivity is highly correlated with regional surface area in most of the assessed pipelines (ρ > 0.70 in 69% of the pipelines), particularly when using weighted networks. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for prudent decision-making when processing diffusion MRI data, and for carefully considering how different processing choices can influence connectome organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类连接组的枢纽能否与扩散MRI一致地识别?
近年来,扩散核磁共振成像在人类连接体图谱中的应用激增,与此同时,处理和分析选择也有类似的增加。然而,很少有人系统地比较这些不同的步骤及其效果。在这里,在一个健康的年轻成人人群(n = 294)中,我们描述了一系列分析管道对一个被广泛研究的人类连接组属性的影响:它的程度分布。我们评估了40个管道(比较了分组、流线播种、通道成像算法和流线传播约束的常见选择)和44个具有组代表性的连接体重建方案在高度连接的枢纽区域的效果。我们发现轮毂位置在管道之间变化很大。分组的选择对枢纽结构有重大影响,在大多数评估的管道中,枢纽连通性与区域表面积高度相关(ρ >0.70(69%的管道),特别是在使用加权网络时。总的来说,我们的结果表明,在处理扩散MRI数据时需要谨慎的决策,并仔细考虑不同的处理选择如何影响连接体组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Network Neuroscience
Network Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-individual alignment of multimodal brain networks with anatomical constraints. Neural compensation in persons with HIV and marijuana use: Insights from a reorganized DMN. A novel framework to quantify dynamic convergence and divergence of overlapping brain states characterizing four psychiatric disorders. Variation in high-amplitude events across the human lifespan. Spatiotemporal profiling of functional network overlapping modules in Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1