Teorias legitimadoras da pena: ciência ou ideologia? Uma análise crítica dos discursos penais dominantes à luz do conceito de ideologia em Marx e Engels

Jefferson Carús Guedes, Paulo Márcio de Nápolis
{"title":"Teorias legitimadoras da pena: ciência ou ideologia? Uma análise crítica dos discursos penais dominantes à luz do conceito de ideologia em Marx e Engels","authors":"Jefferson Carús Guedes, Paulo Márcio de Nápolis","doi":"10.29327/2193997.5.2-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scope of this analysis is to review the great theoretical discourses on the legitimation of punishment and Criminal Law and their inability to materialize in terms of reality. Faced with the large gap between the normative programming they inspire and its effectiveness, the possibility is revealed that they are devoid of scientificity, as a rational discourse oriented towards the understanding of a certain set of evident phenomena, degenerating into ideological expedients of legitimizing a form of social control through the expression of the power to apply penal sanctions. For the interpretation of the verified phenomenon, some of the main theses of Marx and Engels are revisited, as exposed in The German Ideology, and their peculiar way of defining the concept of ideology. Going through, in essence, the general characteristics of each of the analyzed theories, instead of understanding them by themselves, they are interpreted, according to the historical-dialectical method, as expressions of the hegemony of the class that emerges as dominant from the consolidation of the capitalist mode of production. Evidencing, thus, the ideological essence of such discourses, it is allowed that they be reassessed in their scope and purposes, providing a practice that, without intending their immediate abolition or overcoming, allows their exercise in terms less refractory to the dignity of the human person.","PeriodicalId":34528,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/2193997.5.2-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scope of this analysis is to review the great theoretical discourses on the legitimation of punishment and Criminal Law and their inability to materialize in terms of reality. Faced with the large gap between the normative programming they inspire and its effectiveness, the possibility is revealed that they are devoid of scientificity, as a rational discourse oriented towards the understanding of a certain set of evident phenomena, degenerating into ideological expedients of legitimizing a form of social control through the expression of the power to apply penal sanctions. For the interpretation of the verified phenomenon, some of the main theses of Marx and Engels are revisited, as exposed in The German Ideology, and their peculiar way of defining the concept of ideology. Going through, in essence, the general characteristics of each of the analyzed theories, instead of understanding them by themselves, they are interpreted, according to the historical-dialectical method, as expressions of the hegemony of the class that emerges as dominant from the consolidation of the capitalist mode of production. Evidencing, thus, the ideological essence of such discourses, it is allowed that they be reassessed in their scope and purposes, providing a practice that, without intending their immediate abolition or overcoming, allows their exercise in terms less refractory to the dignity of the human person.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合法化的惩罚理论:科学还是意识形态?从马克思恩格斯的意识形态概念出发,对占主导地位的刑事话语进行批判性分析
本文的分析范围是回顾关于刑罚正当化和刑法正当化的重大理论论述,以及它们在现实中的无法实现。面对它们所激发的规范性规划与其有效性之间的巨大差距,它们有可能缺乏科学性,因为它们是一种旨在理解某些明显现象的理性话语,通过表达适用刑事制裁的权力,退化为使一种社会控制形式合法化的意识形态权宜之计。为了解释这一被证实的现象,我们重新审视了马克思和恩格斯在《德意志意识形态》中所揭示的一些主要论点,以及他们对意识形态概念的独特定义方式。从本质上讲,我们考察了所分析的每一种理论的一般特征,而不是单独理解它们,而是根据历史辩证的方法,把它们解释为阶级霸权的表现,这种霸权是从资本主义生产方式的巩固中显现出来的。因此,为了证明这些话语的意识形态本质,可以重新评估它们的范围和目的,提供一种做法,在不打算立即废除或克服它们的情况下,允许它们以不那么违背人的尊严的方式行使。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial (RDPDF, vol. 5, n. 2, 2023) Teorias legitimadoras da pena: ciência ou ideologia? Uma análise crítica dos discursos penais dominantes à luz do conceito de ideologia em Marx e Engels Benefícios assistenciais e o critério de renda; um estudo quanto a necessidade de flexibilização das exigências legais para concessão O populismo como democracia-limite a partir da obra "O Século do Populismo": história, teoria e crítica de Pierre Rosanvallon Contra a mediocridade, contra o identitarismo: uma contribuição para o debate público e acadêmico nacional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1