Contra a mediocridade, contra o identitarismo: uma contribuição para o debate público e acadêmico nacional

Carlos Sávio Teixeira, Tiago Medeiros
{"title":"Contra a mediocridade, contra o identitarismo: uma contribuição para o debate público e acadêmico nacional","authors":"Carlos Sávio Teixeira, Tiago Medeiros","doi":"10.29327/2193997.5.2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil, identitarianism is an influential flow of opinion largely propagated into Universities and the press. It is so unrooted in the professors’ and journalists’ head that its premises and political agenda seem to constitute a sort of culture, a very spread vocabulary which define the most part of public debates. This text has two aims. First, to criticize the identitarian movements by showing some of their premises and performances and by associating them to the national mediocrity: an elites’ historic trend to maintain Brazilian people in a low level of qualification, capacitation and prosperity. The identitarianism’s aspects that make them an extension and an update of mediocrity are their anti-national and anti-institutional contents. The second aim is to point out to the core of national problems, derisively ignored by Brazilian identitarians, in the manner how institutions are imagined and designed. If our intuitions and arguments are rights, the main topic of a national public debate agenda must be eliminating the mediocrity, and not to perpetuate it, by uplifting an idea of nation through a huge engagement to imagine and construct institutions. &nbsp","PeriodicalId":34528,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Defensoria Publica do Distrito Federal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/2193997.5.2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, identitarianism is an influential flow of opinion largely propagated into Universities and the press. It is so unrooted in the professors’ and journalists’ head that its premises and political agenda seem to constitute a sort of culture, a very spread vocabulary which define the most part of public debates. This text has two aims. First, to criticize the identitarian movements by showing some of their premises and performances and by associating them to the national mediocrity: an elites’ historic trend to maintain Brazilian people in a low level of qualification, capacitation and prosperity. The identitarianism’s aspects that make them an extension and an update of mediocrity are their anti-national and anti-institutional contents. The second aim is to point out to the core of national problems, derisively ignored by Brazilian identitarians, in the manner how institutions are imagined and designed. If our intuitions and arguments are rights, the main topic of a national public debate agenda must be eliminating the mediocrity, and not to perpetuate it, by uplifting an idea of nation through a huge engagement to imagine and construct institutions.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对平庸,反对身份主义:对国家公共和学术辩论的贡献
在巴西,身份主义是一种有影响力的观点,主要传播到大学和新闻界。它在教授和记者的头脑中如此根深蒂固,以至于它的前提和政治议程似乎构成了一种文化,一种非常广泛的词汇,定义了大部分公共辩论。这篇文章有两个目的。首先,通过展示认同运动的一些前提和表现,并将其与国家的平庸联系起来,来批评认同运动:精英阶层的历史趋势,使巴西人民的资格、能力和繁荣水平保持在较低水平。使其成为平庸的延伸和更新的身份主义方面是其反民族和反制度的内容。第二个目标是指出国家问题的核心,这些问题被巴西的认同主义者嘲笑地忽视了,即如何想象和设计制度。如果我们的直觉和观点是正确的,那么全国公共辩论议程的主要议题必须是消除平庸,而不是使平庸永久化,方法是通过大量参与想象和构建制度来提升一种国家观念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial (RDPDF, vol. 5, n. 2, 2023) Teorias legitimadoras da pena: ciência ou ideologia? Uma análise crítica dos discursos penais dominantes à luz do conceito de ideologia em Marx e Engels Benefícios assistenciais e o critério de renda; um estudo quanto a necessidade de flexibilização das exigências legais para concessão O populismo como democracia-limite a partir da obra "O Século do Populismo": história, teoria e crítica de Pierre Rosanvallon Contra a mediocridade, contra o identitarismo: uma contribuição para o debate público e acadêmico nacional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1