“Roote out those odde rymes!”: The Unruly Matter of Early Modern Verse

IF 0.5 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10412573.2023.2228152
Bethany Dubow
{"title":"“Roote out those odde rymes!”: The Unruly Matter of Early Modern Verse","authors":"Bethany Dubow","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2023.2228152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the literary-critical metaphors of late sixteenth-century England, taking as its starting point Thomas Lodge’s 1579 call to “roote out those odde rymes which runnes in euery rascales mouth.” In contrast to the humanist poetics that envisioned poetic form as geometric, even transcendent, artifice, Lodge’s language (“roote out,” “runnes”) suggests the earthbound and invasive. In this, it belongs to a cluster of early modern metaphors that figure poetic structures (rhyme, metric feet, alliteration) as material, biological forms. Moving between Lodge’s, William Webbe’s, Gabriel Harvey’s and Edmund Spenser’s “ecopoetic” metaphors, this article proposes an early modern “ecopoetics.” It argues that to recognize how such poetic structures “act as quasi agents … with trajectories, propensities, or tendencies of their own” is to reapproach early modern poiesis, centering less on the individual poet’s delimiting techne and more on how extra-human patterns and rhythms find their way onto the page.","PeriodicalId":43692,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2023.2228152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the literary-critical metaphors of late sixteenth-century England, taking as its starting point Thomas Lodge’s 1579 call to “roote out those odde rymes which runnes in euery rascales mouth.” In contrast to the humanist poetics that envisioned poetic form as geometric, even transcendent, artifice, Lodge’s language (“roote out,” “runnes”) suggests the earthbound and invasive. In this, it belongs to a cluster of early modern metaphors that figure poetic structures (rhyme, metric feet, alliteration) as material, biological forms. Moving between Lodge’s, William Webbe’s, Gabriel Harvey’s and Edmund Spenser’s “ecopoetic” metaphors, this article proposes an early modern “ecopoetics.” It argues that to recognize how such poetic structures “act as quasi agents … with trajectories, propensities, or tendencies of their own” is to reapproach early modern poiesis, centering less on the individual poet’s delimiting techne and more on how extra-human patterns and rhythms find their way onto the page.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“把那些古怪的押韵去掉!”:《早期现代诗歌的不羁问题》
本文以托马斯·洛奇(Thomas Lodge) 1579年的号召为出发点,重点关注16世纪晚期英国的文学批评隐喻:“根除那些在流氓口中流传的古怪押韵。”人文主义诗学将诗歌形式设想为几何的,甚至是超越的技巧,与之相反,洛奇的语言(“根出”,“runnes”)表明了世俗和侵入性。在这一点上,它属于一组早期现代隐喻,这些隐喻将诗歌结构(押韵、格律步、头韵)视为物质的、生物的形式。本文在洛奇、威廉·韦伯、加布里埃尔·哈维和埃德蒙·斯宾塞的“生态诗学”隐喻之间进行梳理,提出了一种早期现代的“生态诗学”。它认为,要认识到这样的诗歌结构是如何“以其自身的轨迹、倾向或倾向充当准代理人”的,就需要重新审视早期现代诗歌,不再关注诗人个人的划界技巧,而是更多地关注超人类的模式和节奏是如何出现在书页上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory
Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The first issue of Exemplaria, with an article by Jacques Le Goff, was published in 1989. Since then the journal has established itself as one of the most consistently interesting and challenging periodicals devoted to Medieval and Renaissance studies. Providing a forum for different terminologies and different approaches, it has included symposia and special issues on teaching Chaucer, women, history and literature, rhetoric, medieval noise, and Jewish medieval studies and literary theory. The Times Literary Supplement recently included a review of Exemplaria and said that "it breaks into new territory, while never compromising on scholarly quality".
期刊最新文献
Eating Well/Well Eaten: Lot’s Wife’s Folly and the Wisdom of Salt in Cleanness “Roote out those odde rymes!”: The Unruly Matter of Early Modern Verse “Of spicerie of leef, and bark, and roote”: Recombinative Materiality in the Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale “Manlike, but Different Sex”: Genealogies of Trans Femininity in Milton’s Paradise Lost Matter and Meaning: Early English New Materialisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1