“Manlike, but Different Sex”: Genealogies of Trans Femininity in Milton’s Paradise Lost

IF 0.5 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10412573.2023.2224153
Nat Rivkin
{"title":"“Manlike, but Different Sex”: Genealogies of Trans Femininity in Milton’s <i>Paradise Lost</i>","authors":"Nat Rivkin","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2023.2224153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how Paradise Lost serves as a source for trans studies from the field’s inception in the 1990s. Susan Stryker cites Adam’s fallen lament as a conclusion to her landmark essay “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Mountain of Chamounix: Performing Transgender Rage,” but she uses his speech without attending to the troublingly misogynistic direction in which it turns. Two decades later, Karen Barad’s “TransMaterialities: Trans*/Matter/Realities and Queer Political Imaginings” reproduces large portions of Stryker’s essay while obscuring her Miltonic source material — as well as the distinction between the terms queer and trans. Following Stryker’s citation of Milton and Barad’s use of “My Words,” this article offers alternative genealogies of trans femininity in Paradise Lost, from Eve’s surgical birth to Adam’s prelapsarian pregnancy. I argue that the imposition of Eve’s labor pains and the denial of Adam’s feminization expose postlapsarian sex assignment as tragically cisgender. Moreover, the persistent masculinity of Milton’s angels renders them less resonant with trans femininity. Milton’s portrayals of sexual difference challenge the modern evangelical argument that transphobia is biblically sanctioned. It is Milton’s expansion of Genesis 2:23 in Paradise Lost that enables rather than restricts gender identities we would now call trans.","PeriodicalId":43692,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2023.2224153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how Paradise Lost serves as a source for trans studies from the field’s inception in the 1990s. Susan Stryker cites Adam’s fallen lament as a conclusion to her landmark essay “My Words to Victor Frankenstein Above the Mountain of Chamounix: Performing Transgender Rage,” but she uses his speech without attending to the troublingly misogynistic direction in which it turns. Two decades later, Karen Barad’s “TransMaterialities: Trans*/Matter/Realities and Queer Political Imaginings” reproduces large portions of Stryker’s essay while obscuring her Miltonic source material — as well as the distinction between the terms queer and trans. Following Stryker’s citation of Milton and Barad’s use of “My Words,” this article offers alternative genealogies of trans femininity in Paradise Lost, from Eve’s surgical birth to Adam’s prelapsarian pregnancy. I argue that the imposition of Eve’s labor pains and the denial of Adam’s feminization expose postlapsarian sex assignment as tragically cisgender. Moreover, the persistent masculinity of Milton’s angels renders them less resonant with trans femininity. Milton’s portrayals of sexual difference challenge the modern evangelical argument that transphobia is biblically sanctioned. It is Milton’s expansion of Genesis 2:23 in Paradise Lost that enables rather than restricts gender identities we would now call trans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“像男人,但性别不同”:弥尔顿《失乐园》中跨性别女性的谱系
这篇文章探讨了《失乐园》如何从20世纪90年代该领域开始作为跨性别研究的来源。苏珊·斯崔克(Susan Stryker)引用亚当堕落的悲叹作为她里程碑式的文章《我对维克多·弗兰肯斯坦的话:在夏蒙尼山之上:表演变性人的愤怒》的结尾,但她使用了亚当的演讲,却没有注意到它转向的令人不安的厌恶女性的方向。二十年后,凯伦·巴拉德的《跨物质:跨性/物质/现实与酷儿政治想象》再现了斯崔克文章的大部分内容,但模糊了她的弥尔顿原始材料——以及酷儿和跨性这两个词之间的区别。继Stryker引用弥尔顿和巴拉德对“我的话”的使用之后,这篇文章提供了《失乐园》中跨性别女性的另一种谱系,从夏娃的手术分娩到亚当的堕落前怀孕。我认为,夏娃分娩阵痛的强加和亚当女性化的否认暴露了堕落后的性别分配是悲惨的顺性别。此外,弥尔顿笔下天使持久的男性气质,使他们与变性女性的共鸣更少。弥尔顿对性别差异的描绘挑战了现代福音派的观点,即变性恐惧症是圣经所认可的。弥尔顿在《失乐园》中对创世纪第2章第23节的扩展,使我们现在所说的变性人的性别认同得以实现,而不是受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory
Exemplaria-Medieval Early Modern Theory MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The first issue of Exemplaria, with an article by Jacques Le Goff, was published in 1989. Since then the journal has established itself as one of the most consistently interesting and challenging periodicals devoted to Medieval and Renaissance studies. Providing a forum for different terminologies and different approaches, it has included symposia and special issues on teaching Chaucer, women, history and literature, rhetoric, medieval noise, and Jewish medieval studies and literary theory. The Times Literary Supplement recently included a review of Exemplaria and said that "it breaks into new territory, while never compromising on scholarly quality".
期刊最新文献
Eating Well/Well Eaten: Lot’s Wife’s Folly and the Wisdom of Salt in Cleanness “Roote out those odde rymes!”: The Unruly Matter of Early Modern Verse “Of spicerie of leef, and bark, and roote”: Recombinative Materiality in the Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale “Manlike, but Different Sex”: Genealogies of Trans Femininity in Milton’s Paradise Lost Matter and Meaning: Early English New Materialisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1