Comparative Study of Genomic DNA Extraction Methods for Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Tigist Firew Mekaunint, Hewan Demissie Degu, None Yayis Rezene
{"title":"Comparative Study of Genomic DNA Extraction Methods for Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)","authors":"Tigist Firew Mekaunint, Hewan Demissie Degu, None Yayis Rezene","doi":"10.56027/joasd.242023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the significant grains used in the human diet, accounting for half of all grain legumes consumed globally. To enhance production, conventional breeding and molecular approaches have been used so far. An efficient and rapid genomic DNA extraction method is required for these molecular approaches. The aim of this study was to compare and optimize an efficient and rapid DNA extraction protocol for common bean. Modified cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and potassium chloride (KCL) extraction methods were used. The mean DNA yield per nanoliter was 209 µg from modified CTAB and 150.3 µg from the KCL method. The concentration of gDNA was significantly (P< 0.05) higher for the KCL method, which was 5.01 µg/µl and 2.09 µg/µl for the CTAB method. The obtained DNA was also pure, with an absorbance ratio at 260 nm to an absorbance of 280 nm (A260/280) of 1.75-2.23 for the KCL method and 1.86-2.09 for the modified CTAB method. Gel electrophoresis separation was used to evaluate the quality of the total DNA extracted by the present protocols. The results showed that intense bands close to the gel wells were obtained from both extraction methods. DNA isolated with the two methods was successfully used for PCR-based downstream analysis, which includes random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In this study, it took approximately 150 minutes for KCL and 240 minutes for the CTAB for whole process. In contrast to the CTAB method, the KCL method uses inexpensive and less hazardous reagents and requires only ordinary laboratory equipment. Therefore, it is more convenient and economical than the traditional technique.","PeriodicalId":16583,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56027/joasd.242023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the significant grains used in the human diet, accounting for half of all grain legumes consumed globally. To enhance production, conventional breeding and molecular approaches have been used so far. An efficient and rapid genomic DNA extraction method is required for these molecular approaches. The aim of this study was to compare and optimize an efficient and rapid DNA extraction protocol for common bean. Modified cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and potassium chloride (KCL) extraction methods were used. The mean DNA yield per nanoliter was 209 µg from modified CTAB and 150.3 µg from the KCL method. The concentration of gDNA was significantly (P< 0.05) higher for the KCL method, which was 5.01 µg/µl and 2.09 µg/µl for the CTAB method. The obtained DNA was also pure, with an absorbance ratio at 260 nm to an absorbance of 280 nm (A260/280) of 1.75-2.23 for the KCL method and 1.86-2.09 for the modified CTAB method. Gel electrophoresis separation was used to evaluate the quality of the total DNA extracted by the present protocols. The results showed that intense bands close to the gel wells were obtained from both extraction methods. DNA isolated with the two methods was successfully used for PCR-based downstream analysis, which includes random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In this study, it took approximately 150 minutes for KCL and 240 minutes for the CTAB for whole process. In contrast to the CTAB method, the KCL method uses inexpensive and less hazardous reagents and requires only ordinary laboratory equipment. Therefore, it is more convenient and economical than the traditional technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菜豆基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究
普通豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)是人类饮食中使用的重要谷物之一,占全球消耗的所有谷物豆类的一半。为了提高产量,迄今为止一直使用传统的育种和分子方法。这些分子方法需要一种高效、快速的基因组DNA提取方法。本研究的目的是比较和优化一种高效、快速的普通豆DNA提取方案。采用改性十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB)和氯化钾(KCL)萃取法。改良CTAB法每纳升的平均DNA产量为209µg, KCL法每纳升的平均DNA产量为150.3µg。gDNA浓度显著(P<KCL法为5.01µg/µl, CTAB法为2.09µg/µl。得到的DNA也是纯的,在260 nm处与280 nm处的吸光度比(A260/280), KCL法为1.75-2.23,改良CTAB法为1.86-2.09。凝胶电泳分离用于评价本方法提取的总DNA的质量。结果表明,两种提取方法均在凝胶孔附近获得了较强的条带。两种方法分离的DNA成功用于pcr下游分析,包括随机扩增多态性DNA (RAPD)和简单序列重复(SSR)标记。在本研究中,KCL的整个过程大约需要150分钟,CTAB的整个过程大约需要240分钟。与CTAB法相比,KCL法使用便宜且危害较小的试剂,只需要普通的实验室设备。因此,它比传统技术更方便、更经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management and Use of Genetic Resources for Climate Smart Crop Improvement: Overview of the Tailor-Made Training (TMT) Course Crop rotation as an economic strategy for small-scale farmers: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan Agroforestry as a Sustainable Solution for Mitigating Climate Change Impacts and Addressing Water Scarcity in Tunisia: A Review Evaluation of Macro Propagation Techniques for Multiplication of Banana (Musa spp.) Modelling habitat suitability of reintroduced scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah) in Sidi Toui National Park, Tunisia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1