Evaluation of Macro Propagation Techniques for Multiplication of Banana (Musa spp.)

Tigist Firew Mekaunint, Damtew Aragaw, Getaneh Geto, Alemayehu Ayele, Natnael Girma
{"title":"Evaluation of Macro Propagation Techniques for Multiplication of Banana (Musa spp.)","authors":"Tigist Firew Mekaunint, Damtew Aragaw, Getaneh Geto, Alemayehu Ayele, Natnael Girma","doi":"10.56027/joasd.172024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banana (Musa spp.) is propagated naturally by its sucker and corm. However, they are very slow and prone to the prevalence of insects and pests. It can be propagated commercially using tissue culture. However, this is skill demanding and unaffordable for small-scale farmers. To address this gap, macropropagation techniques have been introduced as an alternative propagation technology, called the Plant Issues of Shoot fragments technique, which means plants resulting from stem fragments. This method can be implemented with limited investment and skill on a small scale. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate in situ and ex situ PIF techniques on two banana varieties (Poyo and Giant Cavendish). The data on the number of suckers for each decortication, days to emergence after decortication, and sucker vigor were collected and analyzed using an independent sample t-test. Furthermore, a cost comparison was conducted for the two techniques. The result showed that the in situ PIF technique could produce 16 suckers in three months with the cost of 0.43 Ethiopian Birr per sucker while the ex situ PIF technique could produce 7 suckers costing 8 ETB on one production cycle in three months period. The emergence date of the first decortication phase was shorter for in situ (12 days) than ex situ (44 days). The in situ technique could be a good alternative for banana seedling production under small-scale farming conditions. It is important to popularize this technique for the better production of banana suckers at a relatively low cost.","PeriodicalId":16583,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF OASIS AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56027/joasd.172024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Banana (Musa spp.) is propagated naturally by its sucker and corm. However, they are very slow and prone to the prevalence of insects and pests. It can be propagated commercially using tissue culture. However, this is skill demanding and unaffordable for small-scale farmers. To address this gap, macropropagation techniques have been introduced as an alternative propagation technology, called the Plant Issues of Shoot fragments technique, which means plants resulting from stem fragments. This method can be implemented with limited investment and skill on a small scale. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate in situ and ex situ PIF techniques on two banana varieties (Poyo and Giant Cavendish). The data on the number of suckers for each decortication, days to emergence after decortication, and sucker vigor were collected and analyzed using an independent sample t-test. Furthermore, a cost comparison was conducted for the two techniques. The result showed that the in situ PIF technique could produce 16 suckers in three months with the cost of 0.43 Ethiopian Birr per sucker while the ex situ PIF technique could produce 7 suckers costing 8 ETB on one production cycle in three months period. The emergence date of the first decortication phase was shorter for in situ (12 days) than ex situ (44 days). The in situ technique could be a good alternative for banana seedling production under small-scale farming conditions. It is important to popularize this technique for the better production of banana suckers at a relatively low cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香蕉(Musa spp.)
香蕉(Musa spp.)不过,它们的生长速度非常慢,而且容易受到昆虫和害虫的侵扰。它可以通过组织培养进行商业繁殖。不过,这对技术要求很高,小规模农户负担不起。为弥补这一不足,人们引入了大繁殖技术,作为一种替代繁殖技术,即 "茎碎片植物问题 "技术,也就是由茎碎片产生的植物。这种方法只需有限的投资和技术就能在小范围内实施。因此,本研究的目的是对两个香蕉品种(Poyo 和 Giant Cavendish)的原地和异地 PIF 技术进行评估。研究收集了每次脱皮的吸盘数量、脱皮后出苗天数和吸盘活力等数据,并使用独立样本 t 检验进行了分析。此外,还对两种技术的成本进行了比较。结果表明,原地 PIF 技术可在三个月内生产 16 个吸盘,每个吸盘的成本为 0.43 埃塞俄比亚比尔,而异地 PIF 技术可在三个月内生产 7 个吸盘,一个生产周期的成本为 8 埃塞俄比亚比尔。原地脱皮第一阶段的萌发期(12 天)比异地(44 天)短。在小规模农业条件下,原地栽培技术可能是香蕉育苗的一个很好的替代方法。重要的是要推广这种技术,以便以相对较低的成本更好地生产香蕉吸盘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management and Use of Genetic Resources for Climate Smart Crop Improvement: Overview of the Tailor-Made Training (TMT) Course Crop rotation as an economic strategy for small-scale farmers: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan Agroforestry as a Sustainable Solution for Mitigating Climate Change Impacts and Addressing Water Scarcity in Tunisia: A Review Evaluation of Macro Propagation Techniques for Multiplication of Banana (Musa spp.) Modelling habitat suitability of reintroduced scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah) in Sidi Toui National Park, Tunisia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1