Could Better Jobs for Men Have Improved Gender Equality? The Relationship between Economic Growth and Gender Equality in India

IF 1 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Asian Development Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1142/s0116110523500105
SUJATA BALASUBRAMANIAN
{"title":"Could Better Jobs for Men Have Improved Gender Equality? The Relationship between Economic Growth and Gender Equality in India","authors":"SUJATA BALASUBRAMANIAN","doi":"10.1142/s0116110523500105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic theory suggests that growth may improve gender equality directly by raising women’s employment and indirectly by reducing poverty–thereby causing poorer families to discriminate less against females in intra-household allocations. This paper argues that growth in India has not substantially improved gender equality because it has not sufficiently activated either of these mechanisms. I analyze structural changes from 1982/83 to 2011/12 to show that India’s high-growth period has not been pro-poor. While female employment levels have actually declined since the 1980s, growth has not expanded remunerative employment opportunities sufficiently, even for poor males. This suggests that better-paid jobs for men—by lowering poverty—might actually have led to greater gender equality in India—by reducing poverty-linked gender discrimination. The analysis thus highlights the importance of pro-poor growth, illustrating how structural changes can shape employment, thereby altering the quality of growth and its impact on gender equality.","PeriodicalId":39852,"journal":{"name":"Asian Development Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0116110523500105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic theory suggests that growth may improve gender equality directly by raising women’s employment and indirectly by reducing poverty–thereby causing poorer families to discriminate less against females in intra-household allocations. This paper argues that growth in India has not substantially improved gender equality because it has not sufficiently activated either of these mechanisms. I analyze structural changes from 1982/83 to 2011/12 to show that India’s high-growth period has not been pro-poor. While female employment levels have actually declined since the 1980s, growth has not expanded remunerative employment opportunities sufficiently, even for poor males. This suggests that better-paid jobs for men—by lowering poverty—might actually have led to greater gender equality in India—by reducing poverty-linked gender discrimination. The analysis thus highlights the importance of pro-poor growth, illustrating how structural changes can shape employment, thereby altering the quality of growth and its impact on gender equality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为男性提供更好的工作能促进性别平等吗?印度经济增长与性别平等的关系
经济理论表明,经济增长可以通过增加妇女就业直接改善性别平等,通过减少贫困间接改善性别平等,从而使较贫穷的家庭在家庭内部分配中减少对女性的歧视。本文认为,印度的增长并没有实质性地改善性别平等,因为它没有充分激活这两个机制中的任何一个。我分析了1982/83年至2011/12年的结构性变化,结果表明印度的高增长时期并非有利于穷人。虽然自1980年代以来女性就业水平实际上有所下降,但增长并没有充分扩大有报酬的就业机会,即使对贫穷的男性也是如此。这表明,通过减少贫困,为男性提供更高收入的工作,实际上可能会导致印度更大程度的性别平等,减少与贫困相关的性别歧视。因此,分析强调了有利于穷人的增长的重要性,说明了结构变化如何影响就业,从而改变增长的质量及其对性别平等的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Development Review
Asian Development Review Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asian Development Review is a professional journal for disseminating the results of economic and development research carried out by staff and resource persons of the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The Review stresses policy and operational relevance of development issues rather than the technical aspects of economics and other social sciences. Articles are refereed and intended for readership among economists and social scientists in government, private sector, academia, and international organizations.
期刊最新文献
Shifting Trade Winds: Southeast Asia’s Response to the United States–People’s Republic of China Trade Dispute Structural Transformation in Asia and the Pacific The Impact of Special Economic Zones on Economic Development: Evidence from Nightlight Analysis in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic Minimum Wage and Educational Pathways in Indonesia: General or Vocational Tracks? Trade Openness and the Growth–Poverty Nexus: A Reappraisal with a New Openness Indicator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1