{"title":"On the Advantages of Searching Infeasible Regions in Constrained Evolutionary-based Multi-Objective Engineering Optimization","authors":"Yohanes Bimo Dwianto, Pramudita Satria Palar, Lavi Rizki Zuhal, Akira Oyama","doi":"10.1115/1.4063629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Solving a multiple-criteria optimization problem with severe constraints remains a significant issue in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA). The problem primarily stems from the need for a suitable constraint-handling technique for an MOEA. One potential approach is to balance the search in both feasible and infeasible regions to find the Pareto front efficiently. The justification for such a strategy is that the infeasible region also provides valuable information for the MOEA, especially in problems with a small percentage of feasibility areas. To that end, this paper investigates the potential of the infeasibility-driven principle based on multiple constraint ranking-based techniques to solve a multi-objective problem with a large number of constraints. By analyzing the results from intensive experiments on a set of test problems, including the realistic multi-objective car structure design and actuator design problem, it is shown that there is a significant improvement gained in terms of convergence and diversity by utilizing the generalized version of the multiple constraint ranking techniques.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Solving a multiple-criteria optimization problem with severe constraints remains a significant issue in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA). The problem primarily stems from the need for a suitable constraint-handling technique for an MOEA. One potential approach is to balance the search in both feasible and infeasible regions to find the Pareto front efficiently. The justification for such a strategy is that the infeasible region also provides valuable information for the MOEA, especially in problems with a small percentage of feasibility areas. To that end, this paper investigates the potential of the infeasibility-driven principle based on multiple constraint ranking-based techniques to solve a multi-objective problem with a large number of constraints. By analyzing the results from intensive experiments on a set of test problems, including the realistic multi-objective car structure design and actuator design problem, it is shown that there is a significant improvement gained in terms of convergence and diversity by utilizing the generalized version of the multiple constraint ranking techniques.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.