An Alternating Treatment Design Comparing Small Group Reading Interventions Across Early Elementary Readers

Madison Billingsley-Ring, Kayla Bates-Brantley, Hailey Ripple, Mallie Donald, Daniel L. Gadke, Sarah Harry
{"title":"An Alternating Treatment Design Comparing Small Group Reading Interventions Across Early Elementary Readers","authors":"Madison Billingsley-Ring, Kayla Bates-Brantley, Hailey Ripple, Mallie Donald, Daniel L. Gadke, Sarah Harry","doi":"10.58948/2834-8257.1051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning how to read accurately and fluently is a critical component for a student’s future academic success. Reading fluency is a skill that many students struggle to master. In addition, many students missed out on key skill development due to the loss of instruction from COVID-19. As schools begin to recover from these educational losses, small group reading interventions offer an efficient solution to service multiple students at once. Small group reading interventions such as Repeated Readings (RR), Listening Passage Preview (LPP) and LPP with RR (LPP+RR) have all been demonstrated to be effective methods for increasing reading fluency. Yet few studies have specifically examined the effectiveness of these interventions in comparison to each other in a group setting. The current study compared reading RR, LPP, and LPP+RR in a small group setting to determine which intervention yielded the largest gains in reading fluency.","PeriodicalId":500741,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Early Childhood Psychology and Education","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Early Childhood Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2834-8257.1051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Learning how to read accurately and fluently is a critical component for a student’s future academic success. Reading fluency is a skill that many students struggle to master. In addition, many students missed out on key skill development due to the loss of instruction from COVID-19. As schools begin to recover from these educational losses, small group reading interventions offer an efficient solution to service multiple students at once. Small group reading interventions such as Repeated Readings (RR), Listening Passage Preview (LPP) and LPP with RR (LPP+RR) have all been demonstrated to be effective methods for increasing reading fluency. Yet few studies have specifically examined the effectiveness of these interventions in comparison to each other in a group setting. The current study compared reading RR, LPP, and LPP+RR in a small group setting to determine which intervention yielded the largest gains in reading fluency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交替治疗设计比较小学早期读者的小组阅读干预
学习如何准确流利地阅读是学生未来学业成功的关键组成部分。流畅阅读是许多学生难以掌握的技能。此外,由于COVID-19失去了指导,许多学生错过了关键技能的发展。随着学校开始从这些教育损失中恢复过来,小组阅读干预为同时服务多名学生提供了一种有效的解决方案。小组阅读干预,如重复阅读(RR)、听力段落预习(LPP)和LPP加RR (LPP+RR)都被证明是提高阅读流畅性的有效方法。然而,很少有研究专门检查了这些干预措施在群体环境中相互比较的有效性。目前的研究比较了阅读RR, LPP和LPP+RR在一个小群体环境中,以确定哪种干预在阅读流畅性方面产生最大的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Alternating Treatment Design Comparing Small Group Reading Interventions Across Early Elementary Readers Building Future Capacity of School Psychologists to Address the Demand for Inclusive Evidence-Based Consultation: Moving Beyond K-12 to Include School Readiness Frameworks Introduction to Part 2 of the Special Issue: Helping Relevant Stakeholders Promote Behavioral Outcomes in Early Childhood Avoiding the Summer Slide: Tier One and Two Supports Targeting Early Readers Supporting Intervention Fidelity of Dialogic Reading to Support Preschool Children’s Early Literacy Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1