The Significance of Online Verbal and Written Corrective Feedback in ESL Report Writing among Tertiary Students

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Malaysian Journal of ELT Research Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.52696/rwxl5360
Kum Yoke Soo
{"title":"The Significance of Online Verbal and Written Corrective Feedback in ESL Report Writing among Tertiary Students","authors":"Kum Yoke Soo","doi":"10.52696/rwxl5360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online corrective feedback (OCF) is important in online teaching and learning to detect and measure students’ understanding of the lesson. However, not all researchers agree to this, and continuous debates have been discussed as to whether corrective feedback helps improve language development. This study aims to identify responses to the types of online corrective feedback received by ESL learners and to determine the positive and negative responses to verbal and written corrective feedback. One hundred and fifteen ESL tertiary learners taking the report writing course participated in the study which was conducted during a 14-week semester through the online learning platform. Thereafter, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five randomly selected participants. The findings show that OCF had better responses for verbal corrective feedback than written corrective feedback although both the verbal and written feedback were found to be satisfactory as well as useful to the respondents. In effect, the OCF was able to elicit corrections of content and language. However, for both the verbal corrective feedback and the written corrective feedback, the responses were not all positive. This suggests that online corrective feedback can be effective by means of digital technologies. However, issues such as learner attitude, type of corrections and feedback given, learners’ lack of confidence and language proficiency, besides internet connectivity and other issues, should be addressed. In addition, efforts to provide input in the feedback process is required on the part of the instructor and students to enable the learning objectives to be achieved. For future research, it is recommended that research be conducted on the relationship between OCF and writing performance.","PeriodicalId":52060,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of ELT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52696/rwxl5360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online corrective feedback (OCF) is important in online teaching and learning to detect and measure students’ understanding of the lesson. However, not all researchers agree to this, and continuous debates have been discussed as to whether corrective feedback helps improve language development. This study aims to identify responses to the types of online corrective feedback received by ESL learners and to determine the positive and negative responses to verbal and written corrective feedback. One hundred and fifteen ESL tertiary learners taking the report writing course participated in the study which was conducted during a 14-week semester through the online learning platform. Thereafter, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five randomly selected participants. The findings show that OCF had better responses for verbal corrective feedback than written corrective feedback although both the verbal and written feedback were found to be satisfactory as well as useful to the respondents. In effect, the OCF was able to elicit corrections of content and language. However, for both the verbal corrective feedback and the written corrective feedback, the responses were not all positive. This suggests that online corrective feedback can be effective by means of digital technologies. However, issues such as learner attitude, type of corrections and feedback given, learners’ lack of confidence and language proficiency, besides internet connectivity and other issues, should be addressed. In addition, efforts to provide input in the feedback process is required on the part of the instructor and students to enable the learning objectives to be achieved. For future research, it is recommended that research be conducted on the relationship between OCF and writing performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络口头和书面纠正反馈在大学生ESL报告写作中的意义
在线纠正反馈(OCF)是在线教学中检测和衡量学生对课程理解程度的重要手段。然而,并不是所有的研究人员都同意这一点,关于纠正反馈是否有助于提高语言发展的争论一直在持续。本研究旨在确定ESL学习者收到的在线纠正反馈类型的反应,并确定口头和书面纠正反馈的积极和消极反应。115名参加报告写作课程的ESL高等教育学习者通过在线学习平台参与了为期14周的研究。之后,随机抽取5名参与者进行半结构化访谈。调查结果显示,尽管口头和书面的纠正性反馈对被调查者都是满意和有用的,但OCF对口头纠正性反馈的反应比书面纠正性反馈更好。实际上,OCF能够引起对内容和语言的更正。然而,对于口头纠正反馈和书面纠正反馈,反应并不都是积极的。这表明,通过数字技术,在线纠正反馈是有效的。然而,除了互联网连接等问题外,还需要解决诸如学习者的态度,所给予的纠正和反馈的类型,学习者缺乏信心和语言能力等问题。此外,教师和学生需要努力在反馈过程中提供输入,以实现学习目标。在未来的研究中,我们建议对语言情感与写作绩效之间的关系进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of ELT Research
Malaysian Journal of ELT Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ethnic Representation in Malaysian Year Five English Language Textbooks from 1968- 2016: from Erasure, to Proliferation, towards a “Malaysian” Narrative? CEFR-aligned Primary Curriculum Framework:Rural National Primary School English Language Teachers’ Attitudes and Slants Evaluation of Students’ Experience on Usage of Interactive Whiteboard for Verbal Presentation in An English Language Classroom The Significance of Online Verbal and Written Corrective Feedback in ESL Report Writing among Tertiary Students The Investments and Identities of In-Service Non-native English Teachers That Relate to Their Teaching Careers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1