Distribution of some antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in E coli from aquatic environment and clinical isolates

IF 0.2 Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Journal of Biotechnology Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.25303/1811rjbt028033
Darweesh Jabbar Ahmed
{"title":"Distribution of some antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in E coli from aquatic environment and clinical isolates","authors":"Darweesh Jabbar Ahmed","doi":"10.25303/1811rjbt028033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 80 clinical and environmental samples included 40 waste water samples and 40 stool samples from hospitalized patients. 50 isolates were diagnosed as E. coli. Four virulence genes (Cnfl, Hly, Kpsm and FyuA) were tested which showed 0%, 12%, 24% and 88% respectively for clinical samples and 0%, 0%, 20% and 52% respectively for environmental samples. Six antibiotics resistance genes were detected (TEM, SHV, CTXM1, CTXM2, Oxa and Mox1), their percentages were 24%, 40%, 92%, 68%, 24% and 48% respectively for clinical samples and 16%, 0%, 4%, 100%, 8% and 64% respectively for environmental samples. 16 antibiotics were tested against isolates. Results showed different percentages of resistance to antibiotics as follows: for clinical samples, the highest level of resistance was for tetracycline (100%), imipenem (100%), followed by ampicillin (84%), amoxicillin /clavulanate (80%), cefotaxime (80%), ceftazidime (72%), (68%) for: cefepime, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. ceftriaxone (64%), aztreonam (52%), (36%) for: amikacin, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin. All isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin (0%). For environmental samples, the results showed 44% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline (36%), (32%) for: ampicillin and amoxicillin /clavulanate, (16%) for nalidixic acid, cefotaxime and ceftazidime, (12%) for cefepime, ceftriaxone and aztreonam, (8%) for ciprofloxacin, imipenem and amikacin, nitrofurantoin (4%). All isolates were susceptible to cefoxitin and gentamycin (0%). The presence of this highly virulent and MDR isolates urged us to work seriously to control the spread of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":21091,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25303/1811rjbt028033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A total of 80 clinical and environmental samples included 40 waste water samples and 40 stool samples from hospitalized patients. 50 isolates were diagnosed as E. coli. Four virulence genes (Cnfl, Hly, Kpsm and FyuA) were tested which showed 0%, 12%, 24% and 88% respectively for clinical samples and 0%, 0%, 20% and 52% respectively for environmental samples. Six antibiotics resistance genes were detected (TEM, SHV, CTXM1, CTXM2, Oxa and Mox1), their percentages were 24%, 40%, 92%, 68%, 24% and 48% respectively for clinical samples and 16%, 0%, 4%, 100%, 8% and 64% respectively for environmental samples. 16 antibiotics were tested against isolates. Results showed different percentages of resistance to antibiotics as follows: for clinical samples, the highest level of resistance was for tetracycline (100%), imipenem (100%), followed by ampicillin (84%), amoxicillin /clavulanate (80%), cefotaxime (80%), ceftazidime (72%), (68%) for: cefepime, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. ceftriaxone (64%), aztreonam (52%), (36%) for: amikacin, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin. All isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin (0%). For environmental samples, the results showed 44% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline (36%), (32%) for: ampicillin and amoxicillin /clavulanate, (16%) for nalidixic acid, cefotaxime and ceftazidime, (12%) for cefepime, ceftriaxone and aztreonam, (8%) for ciprofloxacin, imipenem and amikacin, nitrofurantoin (4%). All isolates were susceptible to cefoxitin and gentamycin (0%). The presence of this highly virulent and MDR isolates urged us to work seriously to control the spread of antibiotics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水生环境及临床分离大肠杆菌中部分抗生素耐药基因及毒力因子的分布
共采集80份临床和环境样本,包括40份住院患者的废水样本和40份粪便样本。50株分离株诊断为大肠杆菌。4个毒力基因(Cnfl、Hly、Kpsm和FyuA)在临床样品中的毒力分别为0%、12%、24%和88%,在环境样品中的毒力分别为0%、0%、20%和52%。检出6种抗生素耐药基因(TEM、SHV、CTXM1、CTXM2、Oxa和Mox1),临床样品耐药比例分别为24%、40%、92%、68%、24%和48%,环境样品耐药比例分别为16%、0%、4%、100%、8%和64%。对16种抗生素进行了分离试验。结果显示:临床标本对抗生素的耐药比例最高的是四环素(100%)、亚胺培南(100%),其次是氨苄西林(84%)、阿莫西林/克拉维酸(80%)、头孢噻肟(80%)、头孢他啶(72%)、头孢吡肟、萘啶酸、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(68%)。头孢曲松(64%)、阿曲南(52%)、阿米卡星、庆大霉素、环丙沙星(36%)。所有菌株对呋喃妥因敏感(0%)。环境样品中,甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑、四环素(36%)、氨苄西林和阿莫西林/克拉维酸(32%)、萘啶酸、头孢噻肟和头孢他啶(16%)、头孢吡肟、头孢曲松和氨曲南(12%)、环丙沙星、亚胺培南和阿米卡星、呋喃妥英(4%)的检出率为44%。所有分离株对头孢西丁和庆大霉素敏感(0%)。这种高毒力和耐多药分离株的存在促使我们认真努力控制抗生素的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Journal of Biotechnology
Research Journal of Biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: We invite you to contribute Research Papers / Short Communications / Review Papers: -In any field of Biotechnology, Biochemistry, Microbiology and Industrial Microbiology, Soil Technology, Agriculture Biotechnology. -in any field related to Food Biotechnology, Nutrition Biotechnology, Genetic Engineering and Commercial Biotechnology. -in any field of Biotechnology related to Drugs and Pharmaceutical products for human beings, animals and plants. -in any field related to Environmental Biotechnolgy, Waste Treatment of Liquids, Soilds and Gases; Sustainability. -in inter-realted field of Chemical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Environmental Sciences and Life Sciences. -in any field related to Biotechnological Engineering, Industrial Biotechnology and Instrumentation. -in any field related to Nano-technology. -in any field related to Plant Biotechnology.
期刊最新文献
Cultivation, Phytochemical screening and Antimicrobial analysis of caterpillar mushroom Cordyceps militaris and fruiting body In silico analysis of putative hemolysin proteins in the genome of Vibrio alginolyticus ATCC 17749 and their structure prediction Diversity of Fungal infections and Histopathological preparations of some economically important Fresh Water Fishes in Bhadra Reservoir Project, Karnataka, INDIA Detrimental Effects of Lithium on in vitro Seedlings of Pea (Vigna radiata) Isolation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum producing Extracellular Lipase from Dairy Products and Optimization of the Enzyme Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1