Employee goal orientation and knowledge sharing: the moderating effect of leader boundary spanning behavior

IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Leadership & Organization Development Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1108/lodj-05-2023-0268
Myungsun Kim, Seckyoung Loretta Kim
{"title":"Employee goal orientation and knowledge sharing: the moderating effect of leader boundary spanning behavior","authors":"Myungsun Kim, Seckyoung Loretta Kim","doi":"10.1108/lodj-05-2023-0268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The research aims to examine the impacts of two different types of goal orientation, i.e. leaning goal orientation (LGO) and performance-prove goal orientation (PPGO), on employee knowledge sharing, and whether these relationships are altered by leaders' boundary spanning behavior (BSB). Design/methodology/approach A sample of 170 employees and 93 leaders were collected from South Korean organizations. Data were analyzed using path analysis. Findings The results demonstrated that employees with a high LGO are more likely to engage in knowledge sharing, while employees with a high PPGO are less likely to show knowledge sharing. Moreover, the findings showed that highly learning oriented employees tend to engage in knowledge sharing when they are under leaders who show active BSB. Practical implications To encourage knowledge sharing between employees, organizations need to promote a mastery-structured work environment to help employees develop a stronger LGO. Also, organizations could benefit from implementing training programs for leaders that promote their BSB. Originality/value The research aims to provide a more articulate account for how LGO and PPGO affect employee knowledge sharing in opposite ways. More importantly, this research provides new insights regarding the role of leaders' BSB as a contextual factor in promoting employee knowledge sharing. Using social learning theory as a theoretical framework, this study indicates how employees with a high LGO learn the behaviors of boundary spanning leaders and are more willing to engage in knowledge sharing.","PeriodicalId":48033,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-05-2023-0268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The research aims to examine the impacts of two different types of goal orientation, i.e. leaning goal orientation (LGO) and performance-prove goal orientation (PPGO), on employee knowledge sharing, and whether these relationships are altered by leaders' boundary spanning behavior (BSB). Design/methodology/approach A sample of 170 employees and 93 leaders were collected from South Korean organizations. Data were analyzed using path analysis. Findings The results demonstrated that employees with a high LGO are more likely to engage in knowledge sharing, while employees with a high PPGO are less likely to show knowledge sharing. Moreover, the findings showed that highly learning oriented employees tend to engage in knowledge sharing when they are under leaders who show active BSB. Practical implications To encourage knowledge sharing between employees, organizations need to promote a mastery-structured work environment to help employees develop a stronger LGO. Also, organizations could benefit from implementing training programs for leaders that promote their BSB. Originality/value The research aims to provide a more articulate account for how LGO and PPGO affect employee knowledge sharing in opposite ways. More importantly, this research provides new insights regarding the role of leaders' BSB as a contextual factor in promoting employee knowledge sharing. Using social learning theory as a theoretical framework, this study indicates how employees with a high LGO learn the behaviors of boundary spanning leaders and are more willing to engage in knowledge sharing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工目标导向与知识共享:领导者跨界行为的调节作用
本研究旨在探讨学习目标导向(LGO)和绩效证明目标导向(PPGO)两种不同类型的目标导向对员工知识共享的影响,以及领导者的边界跨越行为是否会改变这两种关系。设计/方法/方法从韩国的组织中收集了170名员工和93名领导者的样本。采用通径分析法对数据进行分析。结果表明,高LGO的员工更有可能参与知识共享,而高PPGO的员工则不太可能参与知识共享。此外,研究结果还显示,当高度学习导向的员工在表现出积极的BSB的领导下时,他们倾向于参与知识分享。为了鼓励员工之间的知识共享,组织需要促进一个掌握结构的工作环境,以帮助员工建立更强的LGO。此外,组织也可以从为领导者实施培训计划中受益,以促进他们的BSB。原创性/价值本研究旨在为LGO和PPGO如何以相反的方式影响员工知识共享提供一个更清晰的解释。更重要的是,本研究提供了关于领导者的BSB作为促进员工知识共享的语境因素的作用的新见解。本研究以社会学习理论为理论框架,揭示了高LGO的员工如何学习跨界领导者的行为,并更愿意参与知识共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The journal addresses a broad range of topics which are relevant to organizations and reflective of societal developments. Public and private sector organizations alike face ongoing pressure to streamline activities, improve efficiency and achieve demanding organizational objectives. In this context, the ability of senior managers to understand the culture and dynamics of organizations and to deliver strong leadership during periods of change, could be the difference between organizational failure and success.
期刊最新文献
Unlocking organisational citizenship and innovation: a servant leadership approach for psychological empowerment Examining the extended full-range leadership model and leadership effectiveness in remote work contexts: the moderating role of VUCA environments Religiosity as a buffer against the impact of abusive supervision on employee unethical behavior: a moderated mediation model Cynicism, justice and behavioral support for change: a moderated mediation analysis Leader generosity and employee knowledge sharing: an episodic perspective of generalized reciprocity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1