Australian COVID-19 pandemic: A Bradford Hill Analysis of Iatrogenic Excess Mortality

{"title":"Australian COVID-19 pandemic: A Bradford Hill Analysis of Iatrogenic Excess Mortality","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jcei.08.02.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australian official mortality data show no clear evidence of significant excess deaths in 2020, implying from an older WHO definition that there was no COVID-19 pandemic. A seasonality analysis suggests that COVID-19 deaths in 2020 were likely misclassifications of influenza and pneumonia deaths. Australian excess mortality became significant only since 2021 when the level was high enough to justify calling a pandemic. Significant excess mortality was strongly correlated (+74%) with COVID-19 mass injections five months earlier. Strength of correlation, consistency, specificity, temporality, and dose-response relationship are foremost Bradford Hill criteria which are satisfied by the data to suggest the iatrogenesis of the Australian pandemic, where excess deaths were largely caused by COVID-19 injections. Therefore, a strong case has been presented for the iatrogenic origins of the Australian COVID-19 pandemic and therefore, the associated mortality risk/benefit ratio for COVID injections is very high.","PeriodicalId":73657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental immunology","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jcei.08.02.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australian official mortality data show no clear evidence of significant excess deaths in 2020, implying from an older WHO definition that there was no COVID-19 pandemic. A seasonality analysis suggests that COVID-19 deaths in 2020 were likely misclassifications of influenza and pneumonia deaths. Australian excess mortality became significant only since 2021 when the level was high enough to justify calling a pandemic. Significant excess mortality was strongly correlated (+74%) with COVID-19 mass injections five months earlier. Strength of correlation, consistency, specificity, temporality, and dose-response relationship are foremost Bradford Hill criteria which are satisfied by the data to suggest the iatrogenesis of the Australian pandemic, where excess deaths were largely caused by COVID-19 injections. Therefore, a strong case has been presented for the iatrogenic origins of the Australian COVID-19 pandemic and therefore, the associated mortality risk/benefit ratio for COVID injections is very high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚COVID-19大流行:医源性超额死亡率的Bradford Hill分析
澳大利亚官方死亡率数据显示,2020年没有明显超额死亡的明确证据,这意味着根据世卫组织较早的定义,没有出现COVID-19大流行。一项季节性分析表明,2020年COVID-19死亡人数可能是对流感和肺炎死亡人数的错误分类。澳大利亚的超额死亡率直到2021年才变得显著,当时的水平高到足以证明是大流行。5个月前大量注射COVID-19与显著的超额死亡率(+74%)密切相关。相关性强度、一致性、特异性、时间性和剂量-反应关系是布拉德福德·希尔最重要的标准,数据满足了这些标准,表明澳大利亚大流行的医源性,其中过量死亡主要由COVID-19注射引起。因此,澳大利亚COVID-19大流行的医源性起源已经提出了强有力的案例,因此,COVID注射的相关死亡率风险/收益比非常高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Other Sea Star Igkappa Gene Cloning Assay in E.Coli with New Parameters Australian COVID-19 pandemic: A Bradford Hill Analysis of Iatrogenic Excess Mortality Nutritional Management of Celiac Disease Cinnamein Inhibits the Induction of Nitric Oxide and Proinflammatory Cytokines in Macrophages, Microglia and Astrocytes. Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies Approved by FDA in 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1