Walled City of Lahore Authority: The Royal Trail Heritage Project

IF 0.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Asian Journal of Management Cases Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1177/09728201231203748
Zehra Waheed, Noor Us Sabah Khan
{"title":"Walled City of Lahore Authority: The Royal Trail Heritage Project","authors":"Zehra Waheed, Noor Us Sabah Khan","doi":"10.1177/09728201231203748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case is designed for MBA and undergraduate courses, aiming to emphasize the importance of stakeholder management in projects and familiarize participants with effective stakeholder management tools. The scenario revolves around a project involving community revitalization and historic preservation located in Lahore, Pakistan, known as the ‘City of Gardens’. The project area includes significant historical landmarks and charming, close-knit residential neighbourhoods where interconnected communities have lived for generations. The case unfolds through the perspective of Kamran Lashari, the protagonist, who inherits a challenging project burdened by a history of unsuccessful and possibly unmotivated predecessors. This project is facing a multitude of issues, spanning technical and managerial aspects. Its success is critical not only for its own sake but also because it sets the precedent for a series of ambitious community revitalization projects planned within the City of Gardens. Failure here could jeopardize future projects, strain relations with donors and permanently alienate the local community. The local community has harboured scepticism towards such endeavours, given their prior experiences with half-hearted attempts that brought inconvenience without any lasting benefits. These past efforts have left a bitter taste, making the community wary of new initiatives. Additionally, the project relies heavily on its partnership with the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, which provides invaluable technical support without substantial financial compensation. However, in Kamran Lashari’s inherited situation, this crucial partnership appears to be in shambles. In the classroom setting, students are encouraged to delve into a systematic analysis of the project’s extensive array of stakeholders, each with their own unique interests. This case provides an ideal backdrop for examining various stakeholder analysis frameworks, including the Warees Framework, Donaldson and Preston’s (1995) theory distinguishing between influencers and stakeholders based on power, legitimacy and urgency, as well as the power-support matrix. These frameworks offer valuable tools for dissecting and understanding the complex web of relationships and interests involved in this high-stakes project.","PeriodicalId":41247,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Management Cases","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Management Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09728201231203748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case is designed for MBA and undergraduate courses, aiming to emphasize the importance of stakeholder management in projects and familiarize participants with effective stakeholder management tools. The scenario revolves around a project involving community revitalization and historic preservation located in Lahore, Pakistan, known as the ‘City of Gardens’. The project area includes significant historical landmarks and charming, close-knit residential neighbourhoods where interconnected communities have lived for generations. The case unfolds through the perspective of Kamran Lashari, the protagonist, who inherits a challenging project burdened by a history of unsuccessful and possibly unmotivated predecessors. This project is facing a multitude of issues, spanning technical and managerial aspects. Its success is critical not only for its own sake but also because it sets the precedent for a series of ambitious community revitalization projects planned within the City of Gardens. Failure here could jeopardize future projects, strain relations with donors and permanently alienate the local community. The local community has harboured scepticism towards such endeavours, given their prior experiences with half-hearted attempts that brought inconvenience without any lasting benefits. These past efforts have left a bitter taste, making the community wary of new initiatives. Additionally, the project relies heavily on its partnership with the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, which provides invaluable technical support without substantial financial compensation. However, in Kamran Lashari’s inherited situation, this crucial partnership appears to be in shambles. In the classroom setting, students are encouraged to delve into a systematic analysis of the project’s extensive array of stakeholders, each with their own unique interests. This case provides an ideal backdrop for examining various stakeholder analysis frameworks, including the Warees Framework, Donaldson and Preston’s (1995) theory distinguishing between influencers and stakeholders based on power, legitimacy and urgency, as well as the power-support matrix. These frameworks offer valuable tools for dissecting and understanding the complex web of relationships and interests involved in this high-stakes project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉合尔城墙城管理局:皇家步道遗产项目
本案例为MBA和本科课程设计,旨在强调项目中利益相关者管理的重要性,让参与者熟悉有效的利益相关者管理工具。这个场景围绕着一个涉及社区振兴和历史保护的项目,该项目位于巴基斯坦拉合尔,被称为“花园之城”。项目区域包括重要的历史地标和迷人的、紧密联系的住宅区,这些住宅区相互联系,世世代代居住在一起。这个案例通过主人公卡姆兰·拉沙里(Kamran Lashari)的视角展开,他继承了一个具有挑战性的项目,这个项目背负着一段失败的历史,而且可能是缺乏动力的前任。这个项目面临着许多问题,包括技术和管理方面。它的成功至关重要,不仅因为它本身,而且因为它为花园之城计划的一系列雄心勃勃的社区复兴项目树立了先例。这里的失败可能会危及未来的项目,使与捐助者的关系紧张,并永久疏远当地社区。当地社区对这种努力持怀疑态度,因为他们之前的经验是,半心半意的尝试只带来了不便,没有任何持久的好处。这些过去的努力留下了苦涩的味道,使社区对新的举措保持警惕。此外,该项目在很大程度上依赖于与阿迦汗文化信托基金会的合作,该基金会提供了宝贵的技术支持,但没有实质性的经济补偿。然而,在卡姆兰·拉沙里继承的情况下,这种至关重要的伙伴关系似乎处于混乱之中。在课堂环境中,鼓励学生深入研究项目广泛的利益相关者的系统分析,每个利益相关者都有自己独特的利益。本案例为研究各种利益相关者分析框架提供了理想的背景,包括Warees框架、Donaldson和Preston(1995)基于权力、合法性和紧迫性区分影响者和利益相关者的理论,以及权力支持矩阵。这些框架为剖析和理解这个高风险项目中涉及的复杂关系和利益网络提供了有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Management Cases is a peer-reviewed journal that aims at providing high-quality teaching material to academics, consultants, and management developers, through cases on management practices in the socioeconomic context of developing Asian countries. The journal covers all administrative disciplines including accounting and finance, business ethics, production and operations management, entrepreneurship, human resource management, management information systems, marketing, organizational behaviour, strategic management, and managerial economics. Each issue of Asian Journal of Management Cases comprises four to five original case studies. Teaching cases should be accompanied with a Teaching Note (TN). Even though the TN will not be published, it is necessary for the review process and can be obtained by contacting the authors directly. Please refer to the online submission guidelines for details on writing a teaching note. AJMC does not publish pure research or applied research based on field studies (not case studies). The journal is published in March and September every year with thematically focused issues occasionally.
期刊最新文献
Ramanov Contractors: Adoption of Project Risk Management Framework DMart: Will it Regain its Leadership Position in the Indian Retail Industry? Challenges of Managing the Employability of Differently Abled in South India: Experiences of Two Non-governmental Organizations Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility at ITC: A Stakeholder Model Eat Mubarak: (A) Battling foodpanda in Online Food Delivery; (B) Pivot to Blinkco.io
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1