Eat Mubarak: (A) Battling foodpanda in Online Food Delivery; (B) Pivot to Blinkco.io

IF 0.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT Asian Journal of Management Cases Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1177/09728201241253437
Shazib Ehsan Shaikh, Mudabir Ahmad, Muhammad Abdullah
{"title":"Eat Mubarak: (A) Battling foodpanda in Online Food Delivery; (B) Pivot to Blinkco.io","authors":"Shazib Ehsan Shaikh, Mudabir Ahmad, Muhammad Abdullah","doi":"10.1177/09728201241253437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Eat Mubarak (A and B) case series begins as a David and Goliath story. Eat Mubarak was a multi-city online food delivery company based in Pakistan, set up in early 2019 by three local entrepreneurs. In Case A, we see how—despite being a late entrant—Eat Mubarak makes successful inroads into the market. In just nine months, it gained a 10% market share against an incumbent (foodpanda) backed by a multi-national giant in the industry (Delivery Hero), easily surpassing the nine-year 2% achievement of Cheetay Logistics. Successful penetration against pre-existing network economies of scale is demonstrated. When expected funding fails to come through, the end of Case A allows us to really dig into the business model fundamentals. Will continued growth hacking pay off, or are we destined to fail as foodpanda will make it a winner-take-all market? In Case B, the CEO exits the online food delivery business market. The need to understand winner-take-all strategies linked to all sides on this multi-sided platform is demonstrated. The application of breakeven analysis in evaluating the path to profitability is also afforded discussion throughout the case. Overall, the case series is rich in data on start-up valuation practices and practical challenges in securing venture capital funding for growth hacking where network economies of scale are at play. The approach to this case study combines field studies in the form of interviews with the CEO of Eat Mubarak and data on events and competitors from public sources, especially newspapers and one McKinsey report. It is written with a layered approach, so the students are given exciting facts at the start (such as an entrepreneur facing business failure) but need to read deeper to understand the business.","PeriodicalId":41247,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Management Cases","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Management Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09728201241253437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Eat Mubarak (A and B) case series begins as a David and Goliath story. Eat Mubarak was a multi-city online food delivery company based in Pakistan, set up in early 2019 by three local entrepreneurs. In Case A, we see how—despite being a late entrant—Eat Mubarak makes successful inroads into the market. In just nine months, it gained a 10% market share against an incumbent (foodpanda) backed by a multi-national giant in the industry (Delivery Hero), easily surpassing the nine-year 2% achievement of Cheetay Logistics. Successful penetration against pre-existing network economies of scale is demonstrated. When expected funding fails to come through, the end of Case A allows us to really dig into the business model fundamentals. Will continued growth hacking pay off, or are we destined to fail as foodpanda will make it a winner-take-all market? In Case B, the CEO exits the online food delivery business market. The need to understand winner-take-all strategies linked to all sides on this multi-sided platform is demonstrated. The application of breakeven analysis in evaluating the path to profitability is also afforded discussion throughout the case. Overall, the case series is rich in data on start-up valuation practices and practical challenges in securing venture capital funding for growth hacking where network economies of scale are at play. The approach to this case study combines field studies in the form of interviews with the CEO of Eat Mubarak and data on events and competitors from public sources, especially newspapers and one McKinsey report. It is written with a layered approach, so the students are given exciting facts at the start (such as an entrepreneur facing business failure) but need to read deeper to understand the business.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eat Mubarak:(A)与 foodpanda 争夺在线食品配送;(B)转向 Blinkco.io
Eat Mubarak(A 和 B)系列案例以大卫与歌利亚的故事开始。Eat Mubarak 是一家位于巴基斯坦多个城市的在线食品配送公司,由三位当地企业家于 2019 年初成立。在案例 A 中,我们看到了 Eat Mubarak 是如何--尽管进入市场较晚--成功打入市场的。在短短九个月的时间里,它就获得了 10%的市场份额,力压由行业跨国巨头(Delivery Hero)支持的现有企业(foodpanda),轻松超越了 Cheetay Logistics 九年 2% 的市场份额。成功地实现了对现有网络规模经济的渗透。当预期的资金未能到位时,案例 A 的结尾让我们能够真正挖掘商业模式的基本要素。是黑客的持续增长会带来回报,还是我们注定要失败,因为 foodpanda 会让市场赢家通吃?在案例 B 中,首席执行官退出了在线食品配送业务市场。在这个多方平台上,需要了解与各方相关的赢家通吃战略。在整个案例中,还讨论了盈亏平衡分析在评估盈利路径中的应用。总体而言,该案例系列提供了丰富的数据,说明了初创企业的估值实践,以及在网络规模经济发挥作用的情况下,为成长型黑客获取风险资本资金所面临的实际挑战。本案例研究的方法结合了对 Eat Mubarak 首席执行官的访谈形式的实地研究,以及来自公共来源(尤其是报纸和一份麦肯锡报告)的有关事件和竞争对手的数据。它采用了分层的写作方法,因此学生在一开始就能了解到令人兴奋的事实(如面临经营失败的企业家),但需要深入阅读才能了解企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Management Cases is a peer-reviewed journal that aims at providing high-quality teaching material to academics, consultants, and management developers, through cases on management practices in the socioeconomic context of developing Asian countries. The journal covers all administrative disciplines including accounting and finance, business ethics, production and operations management, entrepreneurship, human resource management, management information systems, marketing, organizational behaviour, strategic management, and managerial economics. Each issue of Asian Journal of Management Cases comprises four to five original case studies. Teaching cases should be accompanied with a Teaching Note (TN). Even though the TN will not be published, it is necessary for the review process and can be obtained by contacting the authors directly. Please refer to the online submission guidelines for details on writing a teaching note. AJMC does not publish pure research or applied research based on field studies (not case studies). The journal is published in March and September every year with thematically focused issues occasionally.
期刊最新文献
Ramanov Contractors: Adoption of Project Risk Management Framework DMart: Will it Regain its Leadership Position in the Indian Retail Industry? Challenges of Managing the Employability of Differently Abled in South India: Experiences of Two Non-governmental Organizations Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility at ITC: A Stakeholder Model Eat Mubarak: (A) Battling foodpanda in Online Food Delivery; (B) Pivot to Blinkco.io
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1