Critical Notice

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.1093/pq/pqad005
Angela Potochnik
{"title":"Critical Notice","authors":"Angela Potochnik","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There's a recurrent divide among philosophical views about science—those focused on practice vs those focused on metaphysics, assertions of pluralism vs assertions of realism, and accounts of how science's history could have gone otherwise vs accounts of how science achieves knowledge. Michela Massimi's Perspectival Realism (2022) is ultimately a bridging project, aiming to cross this divide. The project is to recruit resources from perspectivism, a kind of pluralism about science, to show how science achieves knowledge and, thus, to inform a scientific realism compatible with this pluralism. A bridging project like Massimi pursues is deeply appealing. This broad divide between a philosophical focus on the messy details of science and a philosophical focus on what science achieves recurs, I think, because philosophers are more or less united in our desire to accommodate both focuses. Massimi's Perspectival Realism positions itself to do justice to both focuses and ultimately transcend the divide. Along the way, it is incredibly expansive in the philosophical questions and philosophical work it engages with. The book is also rich with historical case studies, as well as artistic and literary references. For these reasons, my review will undoubtedly be partial and limited, reflecting my own philosophical interests, limitations, and blind spots. Indeed, this book is expansive and ambitious enough that it may need to be read perspectivally.","PeriodicalId":47749,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqad005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There's a recurrent divide among philosophical views about science—those focused on practice vs those focused on metaphysics, assertions of pluralism vs assertions of realism, and accounts of how science's history could have gone otherwise vs accounts of how science achieves knowledge. Michela Massimi's Perspectival Realism (2022) is ultimately a bridging project, aiming to cross this divide. The project is to recruit resources from perspectivism, a kind of pluralism about science, to show how science achieves knowledge and, thus, to inform a scientific realism compatible with this pluralism. A bridging project like Massimi pursues is deeply appealing. This broad divide between a philosophical focus on the messy details of science and a philosophical focus on what science achieves recurs, I think, because philosophers are more or less united in our desire to accommodate both focuses. Massimi's Perspectival Realism positions itself to do justice to both focuses and ultimately transcend the divide. Along the way, it is incredibly expansive in the philosophical questions and philosophical work it engages with. The book is also rich with historical case studies, as well as artistic and literary references. For these reasons, my review will undoubtedly be partial and limited, reflecting my own philosophical interests, limitations, and blind spots. Indeed, this book is expansive and ambitious enough that it may need to be read perspectivally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重要的通知
关于科学的哲学观点之间有一个反复出现的分歧——那些关注实践的观点和那些关注形而上学的观点,主张多元主义的观点和主张现实主义的观点,以及关于科学史如何发展的说法和关于科学如何获得知识的说法。Michela Massimi的透视现实主义(2022)最终是一个桥梁项目,旨在跨越这一鸿沟。该项目旨在从透视主义(一种关于科学的多元主义)中获取资源,以展示科学如何获得知识,从而告知与这种多元主义相容的科学实在论。像马西米这样的桥梁项目非常吸引人。我认为,关注科学混乱细节的哲学和关注科学成就的哲学之间的广泛分歧反复出现,因为哲学家们或多或少都希望同时适应这两种关注。马西米的透视现实主义将自己定位为公正地对待这两个焦点,并最终超越了这一鸿沟。在此过程中,它涉及的哲学问题和哲学工作非常广泛。这本书也有丰富的历史案例研究,以及艺术和文学参考。由于这些原因,我的评论无疑是片面和有限的,反映了我自己的哲学兴趣、局限性和盲点。的确,这本书内容广泛,野心勃勃,可能需要从角度来阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Philosophical Quarterly is one of the most highly regarded and established academic journals in philosophy. In an age of increasing specialism, it remains committed to publishing high-quality articles from leading international scholars across the range of philosophical study. Accessibility of its content for all philosophers - including students - is an editorial priority. The Philosophical Quarterly regularly publishes articles, discussions and reviews, and runs an annual Essay Prize. Its distinguished international contributors engage with both the established and the new, for example, through reflection on cognitive psychology, decision theory, quantum mechanics.
期刊最新文献
The Unity of Perceptual Content Talking About: An Intentionalist Theory of Reference A Fitting Definition of Epistemic Emotions Group Responsibility and Historicism Self-Effacing Reasons and Epistemic Constraints: Some Lessons from the Knowability Paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1