Historicizing Political Dichotomy Among the Double Unilineal but Prevalently Matrilineal Cross River Igbo

Charles Okeke Okoko, Ikechukwu C. Ahamefule
{"title":"Historicizing Political Dichotomy Among the Double Unilineal but Prevalently Matrilineal Cross River Igbo","authors":"Charles Okeke Okoko, Ikechukwu C. Ahamefule","doi":"10.37745/bjmas.2022.0325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The patrilineally-biased socio-political system was prevalent among the Igbo; and was the preserve of adult males above the ages of eighteen. It legislated on the decisions of the paramount Eze and the Council of Elders. The womenfolk were hardly politically visible enough in decision-making as it affected them. Yet, among the double unilineal Cross River Igbo, such as the Abam, Abiriba, Amaseri, Ihechiowa, Ohafia and Ututu, the womenfolk were politically as active as the men. Their decisions which were usually backed by women-specific deities, such as Odamini Ufuforo, Imohuma, Ohuhu and Ibara; and institutionalized social control mechanisms, such as Abiamkpu, Ibuo Okpu and Use, were often incontrovertible. A gendered political dichotomy entailed specific domains of contestations, well-defined political functions for the men and womenfolk; and cultural exhibits that portrayed the audacity of firmness, authority and visibility. Except in the choice of the paramount chief from among the apical patrilineages, the socio-economic and political systems of the Cross River Igbo were suffused by matriliny through which descent and inheritance were acquired and traced. Authority laid more on those who owned more lands and were more numerous. The matrilateral (horizontal) distributive justice system and the ability principles were preferred over the patrilateral (vertical) distributive justice system. Moreover, members of the patrilineages equally belonged to their mothers’ matrilineages where they stood to access more lands, acceptability and relevance in a double unilateral distributive justice system. The paper concluded that it was impossible for the females under the aegis of the matrilineages to be politically invisible since they had certain socio-economic advantages, therefore, political. Oral interviews predominated in the research while written sources served complementary and subsidiary purposes.","PeriodicalId":479838,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","volume":"234 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The patrilineally-biased socio-political system was prevalent among the Igbo; and was the preserve of adult males above the ages of eighteen. It legislated on the decisions of the paramount Eze and the Council of Elders. The womenfolk were hardly politically visible enough in decision-making as it affected them. Yet, among the double unilineal Cross River Igbo, such as the Abam, Abiriba, Amaseri, Ihechiowa, Ohafia and Ututu, the womenfolk were politically as active as the men. Their decisions which were usually backed by women-specific deities, such as Odamini Ufuforo, Imohuma, Ohuhu and Ibara; and institutionalized social control mechanisms, such as Abiamkpu, Ibuo Okpu and Use, were often incontrovertible. A gendered political dichotomy entailed specific domains of contestations, well-defined political functions for the men and womenfolk; and cultural exhibits that portrayed the audacity of firmness, authority and visibility. Except in the choice of the paramount chief from among the apical patrilineages, the socio-economic and political systems of the Cross River Igbo were suffused by matriliny through which descent and inheritance were acquired and traced. Authority laid more on those who owned more lands and were more numerous. The matrilateral (horizontal) distributive justice system and the ability principles were preferred over the patrilateral (vertical) distributive justice system. Moreover, members of the patrilineages equally belonged to their mothers’ matrilineages where they stood to access more lands, acceptability and relevance in a double unilateral distributive justice system. The paper concluded that it was impossible for the females under the aegis of the matrilineages to be politically invisible since they had certain socio-economic advantages, therefore, political. Oral interviews predominated in the research while written sources served complementary and subsidiary purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双单系但普遍为母系的跨河伊博族政治二分法的历史化
父系偏见的社会政治制度在伊博人中很普遍;而且是18岁以上成年男性的领地。它根据最高的Eze和长老会议的决定制定法律。女性在决策过程中几乎没有足够的政治能见度,因为这影响到她们。然而,在双重单行的跨河伊博人中,如阿巴姆人、阿比里巴人、阿马塞里人、伊赫奇奥瓦人、奥哈菲亚人和乌图图人,妇女在政治上与男子一样活跃。她们的决定通常得到女性特有的神灵的支持,如Odamini Ufuforo, Imohuma, Ohuhu和Ibara;制度化的社会控制机制,如Abiamkpu、Ibuo Okpu和Use,往往是无可争议的。性别政治二分法规定了特定的辩论领域,明确规定了男子和妇女的政治职能;文化展览描绘了坚定、权威和可见性的大胆。除了从上层父系中选择最高首领之外,克罗斯河伊博人的社会经济和政治制度普遍采用母系制,通过母系制获得和追溯血统和遗产。权力更多地落在那些拥有更多土地和人数更多的人身上。与父系(纵向)分配司法制度相比,母系(横向)分配司法制度和能力原则更受青睐。此外,父系的成员同样属于其母亲的母系,他们在双重单边分配司法制度中享有更多的土地、可接受性和相关性。本文的结论是,母系庇护下的女性不可能在政治上隐形,因为她们具有一定的社会经济优势,因此具有政治上的优势。口头访谈在研究中占主导地位,而书面资料则起到补充和辅助的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Institutional Constraints Affecting Small Businesses in South Africa Best Practices for Building Trust in Virtual Business Negotiations The Impact of Online Tools in Teaching Sign Language to Undergraduate University Students in Bamenda Library Support: Implications on Student Well-being Transformative Leadership Strategies in Healthcare: A Panacea for Fostering a Positive Work Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1