Comparative analysis of different packaging materials on the postharvest performance of banana fruits

Lokendra Nath Yogi, Shiva Prasad Adhikari, Khem Bohara, Damber Thapa
{"title":"Comparative analysis of different packaging materials on the postharvest performance of banana fruits","authors":"Lokendra Nath Yogi, Shiva Prasad Adhikari, Khem Bohara, Damber Thapa","doi":"10.33545/26631067.2023.v5.i2a.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was carried out to investigate the comparative analysis of different packaging materials on the postharvest performance of banana fruit. A laboratory experiment was laid out at Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college in the month of March 2023. The experiment was conducted in a complete random design (CRD) with 5 treatments and 4 replications. The treatments were t1: control, t2: banana leaf, t3: straw, t4: polythene bag, t5: card box. The highest physiological weight loss (27.677 gm) was recorded at the control (Unpackage) whereas the lowest weight loss (12.61 gm) was recorded from the polythene bag. The maximum value of TSS was recorded on fruits treated in a polyethylene bag (15.325 ˚Brix) whereas the minimum value of TSS was recorded in the control (12.725 ˚Brix). Titrable acidity was found to be highest in polythene bags (0.318) and lowest in cardboard and control (0.2437), titrable acidity decreasing as the ripening advances. Pulp firmness shows a decreasing pattern. The changes were observed faster on control all days, and a slower decrease in pulp firmness was observed in the polythene bag. As ripening advances banana pulp thickness shows an increased trend over the storage period. On 16 days higher pulp thickness was found in the control (2.78cm), whereas lower pulp thickness was found in the polythene bag (2.70 cm). As seeing the overall trend, the pulp thickness seems to be increased with time. As ripening advances banana peel thickness shows decreased trend over the storage period. On 16 days higher peel thickness was found in polythene (0.444 cm) whereas lower peel thickness was found in the control (0.41 cm). Therefore, it is clear that banana fruits packaged in polythene bags demonstrated remarkable quality and shelf life when compared to alternative packaging materials.","PeriodicalId":476289,"journal":{"name":"International journal of horticulture and food science","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of horticulture and food science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26631067.2023.v5.i2a.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to investigate the comparative analysis of different packaging materials on the postharvest performance of banana fruit. A laboratory experiment was laid out at Gokuleshwor Agriculture and animal science college in the month of March 2023. The experiment was conducted in a complete random design (CRD) with 5 treatments and 4 replications. The treatments were t1: control, t2: banana leaf, t3: straw, t4: polythene bag, t5: card box. The highest physiological weight loss (27.677 gm) was recorded at the control (Unpackage) whereas the lowest weight loss (12.61 gm) was recorded from the polythene bag. The maximum value of TSS was recorded on fruits treated in a polyethylene bag (15.325 ˚Brix) whereas the minimum value of TSS was recorded in the control (12.725 ˚Brix). Titrable acidity was found to be highest in polythene bags (0.318) and lowest in cardboard and control (0.2437), titrable acidity decreasing as the ripening advances. Pulp firmness shows a decreasing pattern. The changes were observed faster on control all days, and a slower decrease in pulp firmness was observed in the polythene bag. As ripening advances banana pulp thickness shows an increased trend over the storage period. On 16 days higher pulp thickness was found in the control (2.78cm), whereas lower pulp thickness was found in the polythene bag (2.70 cm). As seeing the overall trend, the pulp thickness seems to be increased with time. As ripening advances banana peel thickness shows decreased trend over the storage period. On 16 days higher peel thickness was found in polythene (0.444 cm) whereas lower peel thickness was found in the control (0.41 cm). Therefore, it is clear that banana fruits packaged in polythene bags demonstrated remarkable quality and shelf life when compared to alternative packaging materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同包装材料对香蕉果实采后性能的比较分析
通过试验,对不同包装材料对香蕉果实采后性能的影响进行了对比分析。2023年3月,在Gokuleshwor农业和动物科学学院进行了一项实验室实验。试验采用完全随机设计(CRD), 5个处理,4个重复。处理为t1:对照,t2:香蕉叶,t3:稻草,t4:塑料袋,t5:卡盒。对照组(未包装)生理失重最高(27.677 gm),而塑料袋组生理失重最低(12.61 gm)。聚乙烯袋处理的果实TSS值最高(15.325˚Brix),而对照果实TSS值最低(12.725˚Brix)。可滴定酸度在塑料袋中最高(0.318),在纸板和对照中最低(0.2437),可滴定酸度随着成熟的推进而降低。牙髓硬度呈下降趋势。对照组的变化速度较快,而塑料袋中的纸浆硬度下降速度较慢。随着成熟度的提高,香蕉果肉的厚度在贮藏期间呈增加趋势。16天后,对照组的牙髓厚度较高(2.78cm),而塑料袋组的牙髓厚度较低(2.70 cm)。从整体趋势来看,牙髓厚度似乎随着时间的推移而增加。随着成熟的推进,香蕉皮厚度在贮藏期间呈下降趋势。16 d时,聚乙烯的果皮厚度较高(0.444 cm),而对照组的果皮厚度较低(0.41 cm)。因此,很明显,与其他包装材料相比,用聚乙烯袋包装的香蕉水果表现出卓越的质量和保质期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marketing strategies for value-added cauliflower products Potential application of biochar as a growth supplement for mushroom cultivation (Pleurotus ostreatus) Plant breeding and improvement system of major woody fruit species Cupcakes with a reduced content of nutrients critical to health based on dry multi-component mixtures Comparative analysis of different packaging materials on the postharvest performance of banana fruits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1