Cooperation Versus Competition: How Do Helping Coworkers Affect Work–Family Conflict?

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Management and Organization Review Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1017/mor.2023.18
Junting Lu, Zhe Zhang, Ming Jia
{"title":"Cooperation Versus Competition: How Do Helping Coworkers Affect Work–Family Conflict?","authors":"Junting Lu, Zhe Zhang, Ming Jia","doi":"10.1017/mor.2023.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although studies pay increasing attention to how organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) affects work–family conflict, most research ignores the boundary conditions and underlying mechanisms of this relationship. Drawing on goal interdependence theory and conservation of resources theory, this research sees two types of goal interdependence as important boundary conditions of how helping behavior affects work–family conflict. We use a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to test our theoretical model. Specifically, using two-wave survey data collected from 386 employees and 90 supervisors in a manufacturing company, our quantitative study shows that the interaction of helping behavior with cooperative goal interdependence is positively associated with work–goal progress, whereas its interaction with competitive goal interdependence is negatively associated with work–goal progress. In turn, work–goal progress is negatively associated with work–family conflict. The results further reveal that the indirect effect of helping behavior on work–family conflict via work–goal progress is positive and significant only when the level of competitive (cooperative) goal interdependence is high (low). We use 196 employees from the same organization to conduct our qualitative study, the results of which further substantiate and extend the findings from our quantitative study. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"34 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2023.18","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although studies pay increasing attention to how organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) affects work–family conflict, most research ignores the boundary conditions and underlying mechanisms of this relationship. Drawing on goal interdependence theory and conservation of resources theory, this research sees two types of goal interdependence as important boundary conditions of how helping behavior affects work–family conflict. We use a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to test our theoretical model. Specifically, using two-wave survey data collected from 386 employees and 90 supervisors in a manufacturing company, our quantitative study shows that the interaction of helping behavior with cooperative goal interdependence is positively associated with work–goal progress, whereas its interaction with competitive goal interdependence is negatively associated with work–goal progress. In turn, work–goal progress is negatively associated with work–family conflict. The results further reveal that the indirect effect of helping behavior on work–family conflict via work–goal progress is positive and significant only when the level of competitive (cooperative) goal interdependence is high (low). We use 196 employees from the same organization to conduct our qualitative study, the results of which further substantiate and extend the findings from our quantitative study. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作与竞争:帮助同事如何影响工作与家庭冲突?
组织公民行为对工作家庭冲突的影响越来越受到关注,但大多数研究忽略了这种关系的边界条件和潜在机制。利用目标相互依赖理论和资源守恒理论,本研究认为两种类型的目标相互依赖是帮助行为如何影响工作家庭冲突的重要边界条件。我们使用定量和定性相结合的方法来检验我们的理论模型。具体而言,利用对某制造企业386名员工和90名主管的两波调查数据,我们的定量研究表明,帮助行为与合作性目标相互依赖的交互作用与工作目标进展呈正相关,而与竞争性目标相互依赖的交互作用与工作目标进展呈负相关。反过来,工作目标的进展与工作-家庭冲突呈负相关。研究结果进一步揭示,只有当竞争(合作)目标相互依赖水平高(低)时,帮助行为通过工作目标进展对工作家庭冲突的间接影响是正向的、显著的。我们使用来自同一组织的196名员工进行定性研究,其结果进一步证实和扩展了定量研究的结果。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究结果的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Responsible Research: Reflections of Two Business Scholars Doing Mental Health Research During COVID-19 Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency Corporate Social Irresponsibility in Business: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Agenda Working with a Mask: How and When Workplace Mask Wearing Decreases Employee Emotional Exhaustion Commentary on Perspective Article: ‘Institutional Logics: Motivating Action and Overcoming Resistance to Change’ – Heather A. Haveman, David Joseph-Goteiner, and Danyang Li
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1