Truth or Dare? Exploring the Importance of Factual Accuracy in Different Deradicalization Counseling Approaches

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Studies in Conflict & Terrorism Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1080/1057610x.2023.2256535
Daniel Koehler, Adrian Cherney, Amy Templar
{"title":"Truth or Dare? Exploring the Importance of Factual Accuracy in Different Deradicalization Counseling Approaches","authors":"Daniel Koehler, Adrian Cherney, Amy Templar","doi":"10.1080/1057610x.2023.2256535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk mitigation and recidivism reduction are typical goals of deradicalization and disengagement programs (DDPs). Arguably, identifying deception and disguised compliance by clients is key to achieve these goals. However, dissenting opinions among practitioners exist whether it should be a task for DDP counselors to detect deceit by clients. Concerns that placing such a task with DDP counselors might be counter-productive and antithetical to the overall goals and effectiveness of DDPs have been raised. This article makes a theoretical contribution to the debate around this question by exploring literature from psychotherapy, psychology, criminology and terrorism studies using a combination of meta-narrative and integrative literature review methodologies. It is argued that deception detection in the context of DDPs is not “good” or “bad” per se but depends on chronological (past, present, future) and methodological perspectives. Implications for DDP research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":38834,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Conflict & Terrorism","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Conflict & Terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2023.2256535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk mitigation and recidivism reduction are typical goals of deradicalization and disengagement programs (DDPs). Arguably, identifying deception and disguised compliance by clients is key to achieve these goals. However, dissenting opinions among practitioners exist whether it should be a task for DDP counselors to detect deceit by clients. Concerns that placing such a task with DDP counselors might be counter-productive and antithetical to the overall goals and effectiveness of DDPs have been raised. This article makes a theoretical contribution to the debate around this question by exploring literature from psychotherapy, psychology, criminology and terrorism studies using a combination of meta-narrative and integrative literature review methodologies. It is argued that deception detection in the context of DDPs is not “good” or “bad” per se but depends on chronological (past, present, future) and methodological perspectives. Implications for DDP research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真心话大冒险?探究事实准确性在不同去极端化咨询方法中的重要性
降低风险和减少累犯是去极端化和脱离接触方案(ddp)的典型目标。可以说,识别客户的欺骗行为和伪装的合规行为是实现这些目标的关键。然而,从业人员中存在不同意见,是否应该是DDP顾问的任务,以发现客户的欺骗。有人担心,把这样一项任务交给发展方案顾问可能会适得其反,与发展方案的总目标和效力背道而驰。本文运用元叙事和综合文献综述相结合的方法,从心理治疗、心理学、犯罪学和恐怖主义研究等方面探索文献,为围绕这一问题的争论做出了理论贡献。有人认为,ddp背景下的欺骗检测本身并不“好”或“坏”,而是取决于时间顺序(过去、现在、未来)和方法观点。讨论了对DDP研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Terrorism and insurgency are now the dominant forms of conflict in the world today. Fuelled by moribund peace processes, ethnic and religious strife, disputes over natural resources, and transnational organized crime, these longstanding security challenges have become even more violent and intractable: posing new threats to international peace and stability. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism aims to cast new light on the origins and implications of conflict in the 21st Century and to illuminate new approaches and solutions to countering the growth and escalation of contemporary sub-state violence.
期刊最新文献
The Ambivalent Effect of Autocratization on Domestic Terrorism The Islamic State’s Visions of Political Community and Statehood and Their Articulation Vis-à-Vis Nationalism Artificial Intelligence as a Terrorism Enabler? Understanding the Potential Impact of Chatbots and Image Generators on Online Terrorist Activities Truth or Dare? Exploring the Importance of Factual Accuracy in Different Deradicalization Counseling Approaches The Social Identity Analytical Method: Facilitating Social Science-Based Practitioner Analysis of Violent Substate Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1