{"title":"Expressive writing as a practice against work stress: A literature review","authors":"Kimberly Lukenda, Sandra Sülzenbrück, Christine Sutter","doi":"10.1080/15555240.2023.2240512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expressive writing is a well-structured written emotional disclosure intervention for processing stressful experiences. Despite its origins in clinical psychology, studies with occupational samples show positive effects on personal resources and well-being. According to the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Ultimate, and PsycINFO. Thirteen studies were conclusively reviewed. Nine showed significant positive effects on mental health variables (e.g., depressive symptoms), personal resources (e.g., self-efficacy), or organizational variables (e.g., job satisfaction). Based on this, we examined the implementation protocols used, sought to identify critical factors for the effectiveness in an occupational context, and derived a recommendation for evidence-based implementation conditions. Participants benefit from writing four times over a 20-minute period in which they are guided by written instructions to engage with a stressful work-specific experience cognitively and emotionally. However, the effectiveness varies for different groups, especially regarding baseline stress. Expressive writing had a more beneficial effect on individuals with lower resources and higher stress levels. Practical use cases in occupational health and human resource management are discussed. The results are limited in the restricted choice of databases and search terms and the ambiguous definition of the evaluation criteria.","PeriodicalId":45287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2023.2240512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Expressive writing is a well-structured written emotional disclosure intervention for processing stressful experiences. Despite its origins in clinical psychology, studies with occupational samples show positive effects on personal resources and well-being. According to the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), a systematic literature review was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Ultimate, and PsycINFO. Thirteen studies were conclusively reviewed. Nine showed significant positive effects on mental health variables (e.g., depressive symptoms), personal resources (e.g., self-efficacy), or organizational variables (e.g., job satisfaction). Based on this, we examined the implementation protocols used, sought to identify critical factors for the effectiveness in an occupational context, and derived a recommendation for evidence-based implementation conditions. Participants benefit from writing four times over a 20-minute period in which they are guided by written instructions to engage with a stressful work-specific experience cognitively and emotionally. However, the effectiveness varies for different groups, especially regarding baseline stress. Expressive writing had a more beneficial effect on individuals with lower resources and higher stress levels. Practical use cases in occupational health and human resource management are discussed. The results are limited in the restricted choice of databases and search terms and the ambiguous definition of the evaluation criteria.
表达性写作是一种结构良好的书面情感表露干预,用于处理压力体验。尽管它起源于临床心理学,但对职业样本的研究表明,它对个人资源和幸福感有积极影响。根据PRISMA指南(Moher et al., 2009) Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*。(2009)。系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。内科医学年鉴,151(4),264-269。doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science®],[Google Scholar]),在Scopus, Web of Science, Business Source Ultimate和PsycINFO上进行系统文献综述。对13项研究进行了结论性审查。其中9个对心理健康变量(如抑郁症状)、个人资源(如自我效能)或组织变量(如工作满意度)有显著的积极影响。基于此,我们检查了所使用的实施方案,试图确定在职业背景下有效性的关键因素,并得出了基于证据的实施条件的建议。参与者可以在20分钟内写四次,在书面说明的指导下,在认知和情感上参与到压力工作的具体经历中。然而,不同群体的有效性不同,特别是在基线压力方面。表达性写作对资源较低、压力较大的人有更有利的影响。讨论了在职业健康和人力资源管理中的实际用例。由于数据库和检索条件的选择有限,评价标准定义不明确,结果受到限制。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, retitled from Employee Assistance Quarterly to better reflect its expanded focus, presents innovative research, applied theory, and practical information to keep workplace human service administrators, counselors, and consultants up to date on the latest developments in the field. This refereed journal is an essential guide to best practice and research issues faced by EAP professionals who deal with work-related and personal issues including workplace and family wellness, employee benefits, and organizational development.