{"title":"A systematic literature review on collaborative innovation in the public sector","authors":"Omid Ali Kharazmi, Shahla Dartoomi","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2266580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study is conducted by a systematic review of 77 papers on open and collaborative innovation during 2010–2020 and explicates this concept in the public sector along with its actors, influencing factors, barriers and benefits. The conceptual model presented contains the aforementioned factors and offers a guiding light to public organization and other studies on collaborative innovation. The findings of the study identified the main actors in this type of collaboration. In addition, factors influencing and barriers to innovation can be classified into five categories: of individual, managerial, intra-organizational, inter-organizational/interactional and general factors and barriers. Finally, benefits of collaborative innovation can be considered in different categories of individual, organizational, social, economic, citizens and general. Among the factors and benefits of collaborative innovation, three concepts like creativity, knowledge and trust make a reinforcing cycle with innovation.Keywords: collaborative innovationpublic sectorsystematic review Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplemental informationSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2266580.Additional informationNotes on contributorsOmid Ali KharazmiDr. Omid Ali Kharazmi is an assistant professor at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran since 2011. He has a PhD in innovation management (regional and national development) from University of Stirling, UK. His main research interest lies in the field of innovation management, scenario planning and systems thinking.Shahla DartoomiMs. Shahla Dartoomi is a PhD student in the field of human resource management, public administration at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Her research interests include innovation management in public sector, and human resource management.","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"222 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2266580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractThis study is conducted by a systematic review of 77 papers on open and collaborative innovation during 2010–2020 and explicates this concept in the public sector along with its actors, influencing factors, barriers and benefits. The conceptual model presented contains the aforementioned factors and offers a guiding light to public organization and other studies on collaborative innovation. The findings of the study identified the main actors in this type of collaboration. In addition, factors influencing and barriers to innovation can be classified into five categories: of individual, managerial, intra-organizational, inter-organizational/interactional and general factors and barriers. Finally, benefits of collaborative innovation can be considered in different categories of individual, organizational, social, economic, citizens and general. Among the factors and benefits of collaborative innovation, three concepts like creativity, knowledge and trust make a reinforcing cycle with innovation.Keywords: collaborative innovationpublic sectorsystematic review Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplemental informationSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2266580.Additional informationNotes on contributorsOmid Ali KharazmiDr. Omid Ali Kharazmi is an assistant professor at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran since 2011. He has a PhD in innovation management (regional and national development) from University of Stirling, UK. His main research interest lies in the field of innovation management, scenario planning and systems thinking.Shahla DartoomiMs. Shahla Dartoomi is a PhD student in the field of human resource management, public administration at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Her research interests include innovation management in public sector, and human resource management.
摘要本研究系统梳理了2010-2020年间77篇关于公共部门开放与协作创新的论文,阐述了公共部门开放与协作创新的主体、影响因素、障碍和效益。提出的概念模型包含了上述因素,对公共组织和其他协同创新研究具有指导意义。研究结果确定了这类合作的主要参与者。此外,影响创新的因素和障碍可以分为五类:个人、管理、组织内、组织间/相互作用和一般因素和障碍。最后,协同创新的效益可以从个人、组织、社会、经济、公民和一般的不同类别来考虑。在协同创新的要素和效益中,创造力、知识和信任这三个概念与创新形成了一个强化循环。关键词:协同创新公共部门系统评审披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。补充信息本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2266580.Additional网站上获取。Omid Ali Kharazmi自2011年以来一直是伊朗马什哈德费尔多西大学的助理教授。他拥有英国斯特林大学创新管理(区域和国家发展)博士学位。主要研究方向为创新管理、情景规划和系统思维。Shahla DartoomiMs。Shahla Dartoomi是伊朗马什哈德费尔多西大学人力资源管理、公共行政领域的博士生。主要研究方向为公共部门创新管理、人力资源管理。
期刊介绍:
European integration and enlargement pose fundamental challenges for policy, politics, citizenship, culture and democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research provides a unique forum for discussing these processes. It welcomes articles on all aspects of European developments that contribute to the improvement of social science knowledge and to the setting of a policy-focused European research agenda. Examples of typical subject areas covered include •Policy-Making and Agenda-Setting •Multilevel Governance •The Role of Institutions •Democracy and Civil Society •Social Structures and Integration •Sustainability and Ecological Modernisation •Science, Research, Technology and Society