From project-based to community-based social impact assessment: New social impact assessment pathways to build community resilience and enhance disaster risk reduction and climate action

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Current Sociology Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1177/00113921231203168
Angelo Jonas Imperiale, Frank Vanclay
{"title":"From project-based to community-based social impact assessment: New social impact assessment pathways to build community resilience and enhance disaster risk reduction and climate action","authors":"Angelo Jonas Imperiale, Frank Vanclay","doi":"10.1177/00113921231203168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social impact assessment can greatly contribute to sustainable regional and urban planning. However, social impact assessment is used primarily in the context of pre-determined projects, while social impact assessment’s role in informing regional and urban plans before projects are even conceived is under-estimated. Moreover, a narrow understanding of the social impacts of projects leads social impact assessment practitioners to consider such impacts as being the outcomes only of the technical characteristics and risks of projects and their implementation, rather than also of broader social, cultural and political-institutional processes. In this article, we reflect on these gaps in social impact assessment. We expand the conceptualization of the social impacts of projects to better consider how social impacts are also influenced by the social dimensions of risk and resilience, and by the knowledge processes and governance strategies that inform and regulate projects. We conceptualize these processes and strategies and design new conceptual models to derive the social impacts of projects. Finally, we reflect on the strategic role social impact assessment can have in enabling social learning and sustainability transformation in localities (i.e. community resilience) and across multiple governance levels (i.e. social resilience). With this article, we contribute to building a key role for social impact assessment in disaster risk reduction, climate action and sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":47938,"journal":{"name":"Current Sociology","volume":"48 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231203168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social impact assessment can greatly contribute to sustainable regional and urban planning. However, social impact assessment is used primarily in the context of pre-determined projects, while social impact assessment’s role in informing regional and urban plans before projects are even conceived is under-estimated. Moreover, a narrow understanding of the social impacts of projects leads social impact assessment practitioners to consider such impacts as being the outcomes only of the technical characteristics and risks of projects and their implementation, rather than also of broader social, cultural and political-institutional processes. In this article, we reflect on these gaps in social impact assessment. We expand the conceptualization of the social impacts of projects to better consider how social impacts are also influenced by the social dimensions of risk and resilience, and by the knowledge processes and governance strategies that inform and regulate projects. We conceptualize these processes and strategies and design new conceptual models to derive the social impacts of projects. Finally, we reflect on the strategic role social impact assessment can have in enabling social learning and sustainability transformation in localities (i.e. community resilience) and across multiple governance levels (i.e. social resilience). With this article, we contribute to building a key role for social impact assessment in disaster risk reduction, climate action and sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从以项目为基础的社会影响评估到以社区为基础的社会影响评估:建立社区复原力、加强减少灾害风险和气候行动的社会影响评估新途径
社会影响评估可以极大地促进可持续的区域和城市规划。然而,社会影响评估主要用于预先确定的项目,而社会影响评估在项目构思之前为区域和城市计划提供信息方面的作用被低估了。此外,对项目社会影响的狭隘理解导致社会影响评估从业者认为这些影响只是项目及其实施的技术特征和风险的结果,而不是更广泛的社会,文化和政治制度过程。在这篇文章中,我们反思这些差距在社会影响评估。我们扩展了项目社会影响的概念化,以更好地考虑社会影响是如何受到风险和复原力的社会维度以及通知和规范项目的知识过程和治理策略的影响的。我们将这些过程和策略概念化,并设计新的概念模型来推导项目的社会影响。最后,我们反思了社会影响评估在促进地方(即社区复原力)和跨多个治理层面(即社会复原力)的社会学习和可持续性转型方面的战略作用。通过这篇文章,我们为社会影响评估在减少灾害风险、气候行动和可持续发展中发挥关键作用做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Sociology
Current Sociology SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Current Sociology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and innovative critical commentary both on current debates within sociology as a developing discipline, and the contribution that sociologists can make to understanding and influencing current issues arising in the development of modern societies in a globalizing world. An official journal of the International Sociological Association since 1952, Current Sociology is one of the oldest and most widely cited sociology journals in the world.
期刊最新文献
Dissenting and innovating: Freelancers’ emerging forms of organising in the Netherlands The German social space and its homologies: National variation on a basic structure Scapegoating queers: Pink-blocking as state strategy Southern theory, knowledge production and Russia’s war in Ukraine: An interview with Raewyn Connell Do countries’ freedom status and gender equality level inform gender differences in bribery? Evidence from a multi-country level analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1