Continuous and Placement Assessment Results as a Predictor of Student Achievement in Primary Schools

Tolera Danki Negassa, Samuel Asnake
{"title":"Continuous and Placement Assessment Results as a Predictor of Student Achievement in Primary Schools","authors":"Tolera Danki Negassa, Samuel Asnake","doi":"10.15408/tazkiya.v11i2.34736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore the performance of out-of-school children in speed school and accelerated learning programs as a basis for success in primary schools. This research field has received very little attention. The continuous assessment and placement test results of students at risk were not used much in the literature, which this study aims to fill. The total number of students involved in the study was 624. The study used the continuous assessment average scores and placement test scores as predictor variables. The results show that the relationship between placement test and 1st-semester score in grade four was significant, r (196) = .501, p < .001. For the Accelerated Learning Program, the placement test and 1st-semester score in grade three were significant, r (111) = .413, p<.001. As a tool to forecast primary school students' future achievement, the teacher-made continuous assessment appears to be less useful than placement tests for children who come through speed school. Students from speed school backgrounds performed better than students from formal schools; students from accelerated learning program backgrounds performed almost similarly to students from formal schools except in environmental science. The study indicated that in grade four of formal primary school, continuous assessment was found to be poorly linked with student knowledge and skills. However, the results show that both comparisons found placement examinations to be a reliable indicator of children's achievement in primary schools. It can be concluded that students who joined grades three and four of formal school through speed school and an accelerated learning program are capable of achieving minimum learning competence in the subsequent educational outcomes in elementary grades.","PeriodicalId":34788,"journal":{"name":"Tazkiya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tazkiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/tazkiya.v11i2.34736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the performance of out-of-school children in speed school and accelerated learning programs as a basis for success in primary schools. This research field has received very little attention. The continuous assessment and placement test results of students at risk were not used much in the literature, which this study aims to fill. The total number of students involved in the study was 624. The study used the continuous assessment average scores and placement test scores as predictor variables. The results show that the relationship between placement test and 1st-semester score in grade four was significant, r (196) = .501, p < .001. For the Accelerated Learning Program, the placement test and 1st-semester score in grade three were significant, r (111) = .413, p<.001. As a tool to forecast primary school students' future achievement, the teacher-made continuous assessment appears to be less useful than placement tests for children who come through speed school. Students from speed school backgrounds performed better than students from formal schools; students from accelerated learning program backgrounds performed almost similarly to students from formal schools except in environmental science. The study indicated that in grade four of formal primary school, continuous assessment was found to be poorly linked with student knowledge and skills. However, the results show that both comparisons found placement examinations to be a reliable indicator of children's achievement in primary schools. It can be concluded that students who joined grades three and four of formal school through speed school and an accelerated learning program are capable of achieving minimum learning competence in the subsequent educational outcomes in elementary grades.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续与分班评估结果对小学学生成绩的预测作用
本研究的目的是探讨校外儿童在速成学校和速成学习计划中的表现,作为小学成功的基础。这个研究领域很少受到关注。文献中对风险学生的持续评估和分班测试结果使用较少,本研究旨在填补这一空白。参与这项研究的学生总数为624人。本研究采用连续评估平均分和分班考试成绩作为预测变量。结果表明,分班考试与四年级第一学期成绩的关系显著,r (196) = .501, p <措施。对于加速学习项目,分班测试和三年级第一学期成绩显著,r (111) = .413, p<.001。作为预测小学生未来成就的工具,教师进行的持续评估似乎不如分班测试对速成学校的孩子有用。来自速成学校背景的学生比来自正规学校的学生表现更好;加速学习项目背景的学生与正规学校的学生表现几乎相似,除了环境科学。研究发现,在正规小学四年级,持续评估与学生的知识和技能联系不紧密。然而,结果表明,两种比较都发现分班考试是衡量孩子在小学成绩的可靠指标。可以得出结论,通过速成学校和加速学习计划进入正规学校三年级和四年级的学生能够在随后的小学教育成果中达到最低的学习能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social Support as a Moderator of Self Efficacy and Learning Motivation Towards Students' Academic Hardiness Academic Self-Efficacy as a Predictor of College Student’s Mental Health and Study Progress Continuous and Placement Assessment Results as a Predictor of Student Achievement in Primary Schools The Correlation Between Family Functioning and Self-disclosure Among Emerging Adulthood The Effect of Parasocial Relationship on Online Impulsive Buying Tendency: Exploring the Role of Financial Literacy and Self-Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1