Religious Conversion and Emancipation of Untouchables: Gandhi’s View, Ambedkar’s Action and Beyond

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Contemporary Voice of Dalit Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1177/2455328x231198672
C. J. Sonowal
{"title":"Religious Conversion and Emancipation of Untouchables: Gandhi’s View, Ambedkar’s Action and Beyond","authors":"C. J. Sonowal","doi":"10.1177/2455328x231198672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dr B.R. Ambedkar led the mass conversion of the Mahar population from Hinduism to Navayana Buddhism in the year 1956, aiming at the emancipation of the Mahar community, who were treated as untouchables. Dr Ambedkar believed that since untouchability was a part of Hindu tradition, Mahars could not be freed from it until they remained within the Hindu tradition. Contrarily, M.K. Gandhi maintained religious conversion as the purification and change of heart and attaining a higher level of spirituality. Every great religion has the capability for reform within it. He believed that a change of heart being within own religious tradition might eradicate social evils like untouchability, and for that, one should not change his religion. The article thus discusses the various perspectives of religious conversions and analyses the views of these two great thinkers of modern India, situating the Mahar conversion as the primary focus. Based on secondary literature sources, the author tries to situate the views of Gandhi and Ambedkar in the broader discourse on religious conversion and show that the Mahar conversion had a socio-political necessity and Gandhi’s views and appeal for eradication of untouchability did not have a practical value given the socio-religious context in India.","PeriodicalId":53196,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Voice of Dalit","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Voice of Dalit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2455328x231198672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dr B.R. Ambedkar led the mass conversion of the Mahar population from Hinduism to Navayana Buddhism in the year 1956, aiming at the emancipation of the Mahar community, who were treated as untouchables. Dr Ambedkar believed that since untouchability was a part of Hindu tradition, Mahars could not be freed from it until they remained within the Hindu tradition. Contrarily, M.K. Gandhi maintained religious conversion as the purification and change of heart and attaining a higher level of spirituality. Every great religion has the capability for reform within it. He believed that a change of heart being within own religious tradition might eradicate social evils like untouchability, and for that, one should not change his religion. The article thus discusses the various perspectives of religious conversions and analyses the views of these two great thinkers of modern India, situating the Mahar conversion as the primary focus. Based on secondary literature sources, the author tries to situate the views of Gandhi and Ambedkar in the broader discourse on religious conversion and show that the Mahar conversion had a socio-political necessity and Gandhi’s views and appeal for eradication of untouchability did not have a practical value given the socio-religious context in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教皈依与贱民解放:甘地的观点、安贝德卡的行动及其后
1956年,B.R. Ambedkar博士领导了马哈尔人从印度教转向纳瓦耶纳佛教的大规模转变,旨在解放被视为贱民的马哈尔社区。安贝德卡尔博士认为,由于贱民制度是印度教传统的一部分,所以在保持印度教传统之前,马哈尔人无法从中解脱出来。相反,甘地认为宗教皈依是心灵的净化和改变,达到更高的灵性水平。每一个伟大的宗教都有内部改革的能力。他认为,在自己的宗教传统中改变内心,可能会根除社会上的邪恶,比如贱民,为此,一个人不应该改变他的宗教。因此,本文讨论了宗教皈依的各种观点,并分析了这两位现代印度伟大思想家的观点,将马哈尔的皈依作为主要焦点。基于二手文献来源,作者试图将甘地和安贝德卡的观点置于更广泛的宗教转换话语中,并表明马哈尔的转换具有社会政治必要性,甘地的观点和呼吁根除贱民制度在印度的社会宗教背景下没有实际价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Voice of Dalit
Contemporary Voice of Dalit SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
153
期刊最新文献
Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in the Annihilation of Caste Book review: Radhika Iyengar, Fire on the Ganges: Life Among the Dead in Banaras Reversing Sovereignty: Deconstructing State ‘Rights’ and ‘Welfare’ in Jacinta Kerketta’s Poetry Voices from Within: A Tale of Caste and Oppression in Kashmir Book review: Radhika Iyengar, Fire on the Ganges: Life Among the Dead in Banaras
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1